Daily Archives: October 7, 2014

First Nation issues- Free Port Indonesia

It was until the end of todays class, I couldn’t come up with first nation issues on my own. But when Mr. Jackes mentions about how first nations issue reminds me of home, I suddenly remember about the Freeport mining and decided to create a post regarding this issue.

Banyak Faktor Kecelakaan PT Freeport Indonesia  Tak  Dapat Penghargaan

Image source: http://www.tribunnews.com/bisnis/2014/10/08/banyak-faktor-kecelakaan-pt-freeport-indonesia-tak-dapat-penghargaan

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc is one of biggest gold producer in a world. This US company has one of its branch located in Papua,Jaya Pura, Indonesia. This Company exploited Gold, Coper, Nickel, and Uranium in the High Mountain of Cartenz. The product of the mining is transported around the world.

Since the company was first operated in 1967, there has been massive issues regarding environmental,cultural and sustainability in surroundings mining area. In addition, recently, there has been rumour saying that Freeport wants to extend their contract for another 20 years after the 40 years of operation in Indonesia. Even though the deal between Indonesian government and the Free port management has not been resolved, a lot of controversy has been going on especially in social media such as twitter.

One of the biggest issue that considered is the quality of life of the worker; several local news recorded, there has been numerous deadly accident. Not only this year,  in May 2013 another accident killed 28 employees all at once. Most of the accident caused by the burial of workers in the construction sites due to the collapsed of underground mine . In addition,this mining site is well known as one of the hardest mining operation in the world. Even from the building process of the construction site itself, Free port has to exploit large part of mangrove forests around Cartenz mountain.

Looking from financial point of view, Freeport has been successful and prosperous. In 2013, the company sold 4 billion pounds of copper at an average realized price of about $3.28 per pound. It generated $13.4 billion in revenues from the sale of copper, over $1.5 billion from gold mining and nearly $1.2 billion from its molybdenum operations. Forbes added “It holds a 90.64% interest in these mining operations with the balance held by the Indonesian government” This means, Indonesia government only owns less then 10% from the total revenue of the production in the country. This amount remain questionable and unaccepted by Indonesians since the operation itself has brought damages on the environment and the threat the availability of natural resources for the future generation. 

Even though The Freeport has paid 20 million us dollars during 1998-2004 to secure the reserve, the amount of externalities of this operations is far beyond what the company paid.I have question the business ethics of a large company such as Freeport and consider their responsibility of operating in other country. First, the mining site is located in Papua, one of biggest island in Indonesia that still populated with 255 indigenous tribe who still live under the old tradition system. Secondly, there has been massive environmental destruction and ecosystem in the surrounding areas. In this case,I believe not extending  the partnership with Free Port is the best choice. In short term, government will be able to at least try to evaluate and recover the damages after years of operation. In long term, this will allows the local tribe to maximize their natural resources,maintain environment sustainability and therefore have better quality of life for the future generations .  

More link

Freeport Indonesia Video highlight 

The Kamoro- Papua Indigenous Tribe

Strike workers demanding same salaries as FreePort employees in other country 

 

References;

Free Port full Financial analysis  

May 2013 accident, killed 28 workers

http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2014/10/06/a-closer-look-at-freeports-indonesian-mining-operations/

 

Site C project, is it worth it?


Site C Clean Energy Project is a long term construction project by Canadian government to build dam on the Peace river,BC. The dam is expected to be a source of electrical power which would generate more than 400,000 homes. Purposely, this project was launched in order to satisfy growing energy demand in the future, according to what has been projected by the BC hydro Forecast.Nonetheless, this project has brought several controversy as the project will not only effect the natural ecosystem and biodiversity, but also the culture and practices of the residential area.

Even though the project will helps to manage sustainable energy in the future, the building process of the dam will create externalities to the surrounding area.The construction process of the project will result in the flooding over 100 kilometres of the river valley, which included wild life habitats, heritages sites and agricultural lands.. During that certain period, the project construction will exterminate all economics activity such as;farming, fishing and hunting. In the short run, this negative externalities of production of the Dam should be considered since this will effect directly to the populations day to day living. I strongly urge, the Site C project and estimate the total lost created by this event, and therefore further steps of this project could be considered closely as this will impact a lot of stakeholders in the same time- for long term.

In other hand, this project will also create several advantages. Vancouver sun quoted”Site C represents a significant economic boost for B.C. Construction would contribute $3.2 billion to our GDP and generate about 33,000 jobs.”Even though this might not create advantages for the infected area, this will help the general economical performance  of BC and therefore, it actually creating benefits for BC in the long run. This advantages should again be take in consideration to determine whether this project should be launched in upcoming 2015. 

Looking at the disadvantages and advantages, I encourage the C plan to further work with the BC government to accurately measure and estimate the total loss of this project. In addition, this estimation could be exposed to media in order for surrounding population to recognize the pros and cons of this issue. Both short and long term should be considered closely, since both will affect the quality of life,  economical, and cultural life of population of BC.

References

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/site-c-or-lng-pick-one-say-b-c-first-nations-1.2776481

https://www.bchydro.com/energy-in-bc/projects/site_c.html