Emoji Story

Discussion
Before deciding how to tell the story, I looked at the emojis that I was working with to see how detailed I would be able to be. I quickly noticed that there were not enough emojis to tell certain important details of the story. I have read the book that this movie is based on and it became clear in this exercise very quickly that “by the standard of phonetic writing… picture writing lacks narrative power” (Bolter, 2000, p. 9). Bolter goes on to explain that the broad range of verbal meanings that can be associated with a picture give it too much meaning as opposed to too little (Bolter, 2000).
This realization made me decide to make the story as simple as possible, while still hitting enough of the plot elements for someone to recognize it.
I decided to tell the plot by breaking the story into separate “scenes”. Then I asked myself how I could explain each scene in one sentence, and tried to depict that one simple sentence with emojis. To make the chronology clear, I placed each scene on its own separate line.
I began with deciding how to use the emojis to depict each important character, event, and object. As I was doing this I copied and pasted emojis onto a word document so I could see only the ones I wanted to use in one place before deciding how to arrange them. I then realized I had created a collection of “salient recollected entities” (Kress, 2005, p. 14) from the movie similar to the student who was asked to draw a picture to depict their recollection of a recent field trip to the British Museum in London (Kress, 2005).
An experiment I would like to try would be to submit the chronological emoji story to one group, and the random assortment of recollected entities to another and see if the chronology has a benefit to helping people recognize the story or not.
I do think that this story has many striking visual elements to it that will hopefully allow someone to recognize it from my emoji story. What do you think?
References
Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kress, G. (2005), Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 2(1), 5-22.






