Food Insecurity at UBC

Something that my years at UBC have opened my eyes to is the astounding privilege that I have grown up with. There are a lot of hardships that I will likely never have to experience, one of which is food insecurity. For those who are unaware with this terminology, as I myself was until a few weeks ago, food insecurity means being without reliable access to food.

Image result for food bank

These last couple weeks I have been participating in an interfaculty case competition discussing food insecurity on campus, and it has been yet another eye opening experience. 8.3% of the Canadian population is food insecure, but that percentage pales in comparison to the 39% of Canadian post-secondary students who don’t have reliable access to food (Lu et al, 2017). That 39% can be further broken down, as  the rate is significantly higher among international students and students with dependents. However, despite the tremendous need for easily accessible and affordable food on campus, only 3% of students regularly access the foodbank. This discrepancy of resource use was something that I sought out to investigate.

In the process of creating an awareness campaign for one of our suggested programs, I completed around 20 brand association tests to become more aware of the ideas triggered by the term “food bank”.  This is where I quickly became aware of the source of the AMS Food Bank’s low usage. Although I had an admittedly small sample size, the frequency of negative and stigmatizing terms was astonishing.

While there is no simple solution to food insecurity, there are a handful of ways that the UBC community can work towards rescuing potential food waste and turning it into affordable, dignified options. The daily food waste from the three residence halls is abominable (Lu et al, 2017), and it would be economical and environmentally conscious for UBC to implement a dynamic pricing model to help decrease this waste. Sure, that solution isn’t perfect, and neither were the other solutions that our team came up with for the case, but they are certainly better than nothing. 39% is far too high a number for the institution to take no action.

 

References

Lu, J., Kwan, W., Annejohn, M., Brown, A. & Tran, E. (2017). Implementation of a food recovery program at UBC. SEEDS Sustainability Program.

« »

Spam prevention powered by Akismet