H3K9me3-Dependent Chromatin: Barrier to Cell Fate Changes

Becker et al. (2016). H3K9me3-dependent chromatin: barrier to cell fate changes. Trends in Genetics. 32(1): 29-41.

Models of Developmental Gene Silencing

  • Genetic material in the nucleus divided into 2 categories:
    • Euchromatin: DNA with relatively low density, high gene transcription rates
    • Heterochromatin: regions of the chromosome that are compact, transcriptionally repressed
      • Can be constitutive (present in all cell types, phases of cell cycle) or facultative (repression temporally specific or cell-specific)
    •  Large proportion of genome has repeat-rich sequences
      • Risk to genome integrity due to possible recombination, duplication
      • Utility in keeping regions silent (constitutive heterochromatin)
      • Repeat-rich heterochromatin marked by H3K9 methylation (di- and tri-methylation)
      • Mammals: methylation catalyzed by 5 members of the SET-domain containing methyltransferase family
  • Heterochromatin protein 1: HP1, three isoforms in mammals
    • Can self-oligomerize, recruit repressive proteins to modify histones
    • Contributes to compaction and spread of heterochromatin
    • Binds H3K9me2/3 via its chromodomain
  • Methyltransferases that deposit H3K9me2/3 required to establish hypermethylation at CpGs, low-level histone actylation
    • Two characteristics of heterochromatin
  •  H3K27me3: methylation of lysine 27 at histone 3, catalyzed by PRC2 (Polycomb repressor complex)
    • Facilitates facultative silencing in cell-type specific repression
    • Especially present at lineage-specifying TF genes eg. Hox genes
    • H3K27me3 marked promoters are still able to be bound by general TFs, paused RNAP
  • H3K9me3 involved in cell type-specific regulation of facultative heterochromatin
    • in differentiated cells, form large contiguous domains called patches
    • Expand in both number, size during differentiation
    • Span numerous genes repressed in cell type-specific manner
    • These domains largely exclusive of H3K27me3
  • H3K9me3: repressive modification, also forms megabase-scale domains that include genes
    • called LOCKS (large organized chromatin K9 modifications)
    • Binding sites for the repressor protein CTCF detected at boundaries
    • Unsure if domains expand during differentiation
    • Important to silence lineage-inappropriate genes in differentiation

Heterochromatin: A Barrier to Cell Reprogramming

  • Hallmarks of cell identity erased during reprogramming to iPSCs
    • Requires the reprogramming TFs to bind their targets in DNA
    • Reactivation of pluripotency genes, suggest that accessing heterochromatin important to the process
    • Only <0.1% of cells are successfully reprogrammed
  • OSKM are the key reprogramming factors
    • All 4 open chromatin sites, but only OSK target sites containing nucleosomes w/o histone marks
    • This makes them pioneer factors
  • DBRs: differentially bound regions, megabase-scale chromatin regions in which none of the 4 factors can target DNA in fibroblasts
    • Same domains bound by OSKM in pluripotent cells
    • Overlap with domains enriched for H3K9me3 in fibroblasts but not ESCs
    • Knockdown of SUV39H112 increases Sox2, Oct4 binding
    • Encode diverse genes and elements, including TFs essential to pluripotency
    • Pluripotency genes seem to be more refractory to activation
    • Majority of genome regions found to have altered non-CpG methylation in iPSCs vs. ESCs are DBRs
    • Some H3K9me3 domains stay in iPSCs – indicate incomplete reversion to ESC state
    • H3K9me3 removal may help increase reprogramming efficiency
    • Knockdown of SUV39H1.H2 led to increased iPSC colony formation
    • Also seen with other H3K9 methyltransferases, unclear which is more responsible for stabilizing the differentiated state
  • Other factors/components of repressive chromatin acts outside DBRs
    • Demethylation of H3K9me3 needed for reprogramming via Utx
    • Repressive histone variant macroH2A inhibits reprogramming
    • H3K27me3 methyltransferase EzH2 needed for iPSC reprogramming
    • Need deposition of H3K27me3 and removal of H3K9me3 simultaneously
    • MBD3: component of the NuRD histone remodelling and deacetylase complex, mediator of gene silencing
      • Knockdown leads to improved iPSC programming
      • Stops reprogramming factor activity at the sites they already bind
      • May play a role in regulating H3K9me3 – hasn’t been explored

Paucity of Heterochromatin Defines Pluripotent State

  • Reduction of inaccessible H3K9me3-marked heterochromatin fundamental hallmark of the pluripotent state
    • Chromatin of pluripotent cells shows increased rate of exchange at chromosomal proteins e.g. linker histones, HP1
      • This indicates a dynamic and accessible state
  • Repetitive sequences: DNA sequences with high copy numbers, organized in adjacent near-identical units or dispersed throughout the genome
    • Includes retrotransposons, tandem repeats, satellite repeats, endogenous retroviruses
    • More common expression of these in ESCs, repressed in differentiated cells
    • Deletion of proteins that maintain chromosomal accessibility leads to impaired self-renewal of ESCs
    • Developmental plasticity of ESCs linked to chromatin accessibility
  • Partially reprogrammed cells have highly compartmentalized heterochromatin structures
    • Contain dense chromatin fibres similar to diffrentiated cells
    • DNA methylation, H3K9me3 at specific pluripotency loci
    • Erasure of H3K9me3 can allow them to become full iPSCs
  • SCNT: somatic cell nuclear transfer, uses factors of egg cytoplasm to restore pluripotency
    • H3K9me3 heterochromatin is a barrier to SCNT as well
    • RRRs – reprogramming resistant regions, silenced only in SCNT condition
    • Reducing H3K9me3 led to improved SCNT success
  • Heterochromatin, especially H3K9me3, presents a barrier to reprogramming, regardless of the cell conversion methodology

H3K9me3 as a Regulator of Cell Fate In Vivo

  • Patterns of H3K9me3 must be reorganized in cell fate transitions in development
    • Early embryo and terminal lineage maturation
    • TF networks ensure that H3K9me2/3 is regulator
    • Setdb1 occupies and represses genes that encode developmental regulators
      • Also acts as a corepressor of Oct4, suppressing trophoblast genes
  • Implantation is followed by a progressive silencing of Oct3/4 and other pluripotency genes (Nanog, Stella, Rex1)
    • Deposition of H3K9me2, DNA methylation dependent on GLP and G9a occurs
    • G9a prevents Oct3/4 reactivation when differentiated ESCs returned to pluripotent state
    • Mutations in GLP that disrupt its ability to recognize H3K9me1 led to decreased dimethylation and a delay in pluripotency silencing, abnormal embryonic development
    • Cross-talk exists between H3K9me3 and H3K27me3
    • A direct role for H3K9me2/3 has been proposed in developmental control of gene expression
      • Reduced H3K9me2 occurs at LADs (lamina-associated domains), coupled to relative depletion of H3K27me3
    • G9a and GLP-null embryos have early lethality
    • SETB1 homozygous inactivation also embryonic lethal
    • Distinct lethal phenotypes in each case, shows they have different developmental contributions
  • H3K9me3 contributes to lineage restriction in mature cell types
    • Shown by examining methylation status in Th1 vs. Th2 cells
    • Showed that H3K9me3/H3K27me3 have different roles in the two different lineages

Molecular Control of H3K9me3 Deposition

  • Additional factors needed to explain site selectivity of H3K9me3
    • Sequence-specific TFs have been shown to recruit the heterochromatin machinery
    • KRAB-ZNFs: Kruppel-associated box zinc finger proteins, important for establishment of heterochromatin and have mostly lineage-specific expression
    • Noncoding RNA can function as a binding platform for heterochromatin establishment at specific positions
      • In yeast, heterochromatin dependent on RNAi pathway components, requires transcription of a locus to be silenced
      • Not well understood in mammals yet but believe RNA is involved in the H3K9me3 establishment

Concluding Remarks

  • Large domains of H3K9me2/3 form in a cell-type specific fashion
  • Machinery responsible for this is still mainly mysterious
  • Need to understand initiation, delimitation of the H3K9me2/3 domains to develop more targeted ways to reduce H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin
  • RNAi knockdown of all 5 methyltransferases for H3K9 was shown to increase reprogramming efficiency
  • Establishment of conditional knockouts of genes alone/in combination could provide insight
  • Future studies of lineage-specific H3K9me2/3 domains should look at whether they impair transdifferentiation/conversion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *