Final Reflection

Strengths and Weakness

Although I learned a lot as a student in English 301, there were several weaknesses in my own scheduling that made learning the course material much more difficult than I had originally thought. The summer heat made it impossible to stay in the room where I access the internet and my textbook via my computer. This reduced the time I spent reading and resulted in me skimming material that I should have read more closely. The heat also reduced the amount of time that I spent writing my assignments resulting in a drop in quality in my writing. Though going elsewhere to write my assignments, it was not an option due to time that would have been lost in transit. My scheduling was also affected the quality of my work because of random events (more specifically unexpected interviews and exams) occurred for three weeks straight taking a day each.

The course work was useful in retooling my writing. I learned that the style used in technical writing is different than the essay writing that I am used to or the writing that I do in my everyday life. The numerous and similar assignments drilled me on the nuances of technical writing.

How What I learned Will Apply

Three things that I learned will definitely aid me in finding a job with the Canadian government. Learning how to compose professional emails will be particularly useful because it is one of the major means of communication within the government. Certain documents that I learned to compose, such as formal reports and proposals, are used within various branches of government and knowing how to write them will aid me in seeking positions and promotions within the government. Some positions on the government job website state that they want applicants to possess technical writing skills. All in all, I think taking this course was worthwhile despite my own weakness affecting my ability to take full advantage of the course.

Reflection on Creating a Web Folio

Creating this web folio came with several challenges. Deciding on where I would post my folio was a challenge because of what I needed from the folio. I decided against reusing a website I created for my English 301 course because I thought it would be worthwhile to transfer the necessary components to a new page so that I would not have to rename old pages and delete old posts on the English 301 page that could be useful in the future.

While creating the new page I decided it would be necessary to create a website with a clean and attractive look to attract future employers in the sector that I would like to work in. Considering that I am not attempting to attract web designers or programmers, I decided that the site should look professional and only include elements that display my current skill set like my ability to write and create professional documents.

My main challenge with the site involved the material that is posted on it. Although the material, the assignments that I wrote for English 301 had been completed long before the creation of the website, this material needed editing. Suggestions had been made by my group members and professor to improve the quality of the materials which had yet to be implemented. Before I posted these materials, I edited them according to suggestions which were primarily about grammar, spelling, and what the documents were discussing. I also attempted to improve the documents by applying what I had learned during my English 301 course (like adding headings and subtitles) where appropriate.

In addition to this, there were technical problems. I was unaware that posts all had to be under one page on wordpress resulting in me having to delete many of my posts and paste the contents onto the English 301 Assignments page.

Reflection on Writing a Formal Report

Email, Letter of Complaint, and Negative Adjustment Letter Assignment

I found that the first two assignments of unit 3 to be particularly notable. The Evan Crisp email was a tad jarring to read, but fixing it served to be good practice. I learned to be less formal in writing emails of a similar nature, but not to the same degree as the one in the exercise. The letter and complaint were very helpful in the way that they taught me how to write for a situation that has affected me.

The Formal Draft

The formal report draft is, by far the longest assignment that I have written during my time at UBC. Upon reflection, I could have done better with my formal draft in multiples ways. The survey for the assignment could have been further fleshed out so that I could gather more information for my report. I could have also gone into more detail while writing the draft. However, I think that I did the best that I could considering that I did not have much time to write the assignment due to a change in my work schedule. The report may also be thin on the ground on information because it is assumed that the reader will know what I am referring to. In addition to this, I decided to exclude information in an attempt not to give away Costco trade secrets away. I decided to take photos for my report instead of creating a diagram (like of the one for the relevant parts of the interior of the store) because they would display what I was trying to say in the report better.

Formal Draft Peer Review

Upon writing the peer review for Dale, I realized that the information that I collected during the survey would be better displayed in a bar graph. That and I should summarize more of the results I received from the survey. I also agree with much of the findings that were made by Dale during his peer review of my draft report. It is clear that I still have a lot to work on in my report.

301 Formal Report David Cheung

Reflection on Linkedin and Planning Formal Reports

Overview

Through completing the writing assignments of Unit 2, I have been reminded of and have discovered various things about LinkedIn, the planning of a formal report, and my writing.

LinkedIn

The writing of the “Best Practices Memo” was fairly straight forward. Most of the research I did was done via the textbook and websites, such as the UBC Careers Online website. I had, to some extent, known and put into effect some best practices that were stated in the websites I researched. On LinkedIn, I had previously reached out to an acquaintance on a personal level when inquiring about a job opportunity at the company my acquaintance works at. In the future, it would be prudent to implement some of the practices I have written about such as having a professional looking profile picture (my current picture is somewhat blurry), updating my work history regularly, (the information on my LinkedIn profile is out of date), and writing about my professional achievements.

After receiving the evaluation for my memo on LinkedIn best practices, I have realized that I have been using the imperative in my writing without noticing it. I presume this is because the previous types of documents I have the most experience writing are essays on historical topics (where the imperative is inappropriate and not used), or emails (which are unaffected with the inclusion of the imperative when it is used). Because of this, I lack experience identifying the imperative and must be careful of using the imperative when writing bullet points due to my tendency to use the imperative to set up further bullet points. The most likely place that I am likely to use bullet points is when I list something in my report like recommendations so I ought to take care when writing that section of my report. I also neglected to include a bibliography.

Project Proposal, Outline, and Progress Report

Being a member of the Member Services staff at Costco Vancouver enabled me to easily brainstorm a topic and preliminary solutions to the problem at hand. However, outlining my report was the most difficult part of this unit with creating a timeline being a close second. I have discovered that one of the greatest weaknesses I possess as a writer is my inability to outline, with any degree of certainty, a document that I have yet to begin writing. I had trouble creating a timeline for the completion of my formal report because whenever I have created a loose timeline for an assignment, I have failed to meet the goals of said timeline due to editing, and have abandoned the timeline. For this reason, I have little experience creating timelines for assignments resulting in the lackluster one I have posted. Both these problems must be addressed if I am to make use of what I am learning in this course.

Peer Review

Seeing my peer review partner’s review of my proposal, I can see that my peer review of her proposal needed work. In the future, I need to read peer review documents more closely and think of ways to improve on what is stated rather than just concluding that the document meets most requirements.

Again, I need to closely read my own document for small grammatical errors like misuse of words and larger errors such as addressing my proposal to the wrong person and forgetting to include a statement of audience.

Revised proposal: Proposal

Nicole’s peer review of my proposal: https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl30198a2022s12/2022/06/29/nicoles-proposal-peer-review-for-david/

Reflection on Definitions

Writing My Definitions:

When I started the definition assignment, I decided to define the term debasement because I find the topic in classical numismatics to be fascinating. Although writing my parenthetical and sentence definitions was straightforward, writing my expanded definition of my term proved to be more difficult and time consuming due to the methods of expansion I used. Considering that a technical writer may need to create a new graphic if one for the topic being written about does not exist, I thought it would be prudent to make my own graphic. This turned out to be time consuming and labour intensive. I also discovered that I had to do more research than I originally thought I needed to because the document needed a works cited section.

Peer Review:

As fascinating the term I decided to define was, I found my definition to be very short compared to the expanded definition I reviewed. I think this is mostly due to the term that I decided to define being fairly simple to define. There may be a disconnect between me and the audience reading my definition, resulting in relevant information not being included due to my background. Producing an insightful peer review was straightforward. There were things I did not catch during my first read through Nicole’s document. I have discovered that, because my peer review partner and I are from different backgrounds, the mistakes we made and the style of writing we use in our writing are completely different.

Revisions:

I have learned that small oversights have affected the readability of the document. When I wrote my original definitions, I chose to use relatively simple language while writing in a formal tone as to not have the document appear too stuffy. I was also cautious to not use numismatic terminology that would confuse the reader without giving a parenthetical definition (as I did with the term denarius). Though I tried to use simple but descriptive language, there were still some financial terms in the document that I did not realize could be considered jargon. I have fixed this problem and the minor grammatical errors that were in the original document. I neglected to cite my graphic because I thought I did not need to cite my own creation (though I neglected to tell this to the person doing my peer review). Although the graphic was regular sized when I wrote the document on word, the image shrank when I inserted it into the word press page, making it hard to see on the original post. I have since made a revision to the graphic in the hyperlinked document.

Revised Definition: https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl30198a2022s12/2022/06/13/davids-revised-definition/

Nicole’s Peer Review of My Definition: https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl30198a2022s12/2022/06/10/nicoles-peer-review-of-davids-definition/