The Long Tail – Taking Your Business Online

The long tail of bdh bikes

Jean-Francois Lapointe added an online business to his BDH Bikes store in 2006 after buying his father’s bicycle shop and has built it into a $4-million-a-year enterprise.

Last week I read an article on the Ottawa Citizen about Jean-Francois Lapointe, owner of BDH Bikeswhich is located in Gatineau, Quebec. Growing up, Lapointe worked for his father at the bike shop, but had to rely on employment insurance during the winters because business was too slow to keep him employed. When he took ownership of the shop from his father, he decided a change had to be made. Instead of focusing solely on the traditional brick-and-mortar business which limited sales in the winters, Lapointe figured it would be advantageous to start selling bike parts online, and it was. By enabling e-commerce through both his website and eBay, Lapointe was able to expand the reach of his company to bike aficionados worldwide. Today, BDH Bikes is considered to be one of “Canada’s biggest online retailers of bicycles, parts and accessories, with yearly gross sales of $4 million.”

This is a great example of successfully moving from offline promotions and communications to include a significant role for online activity. Moving your business online provides plenty of opportunities for growth. In Lapointe’s case, it allowed him to target a niche market through microsegmentation.

Amazon versus Barnes and Noble

This gave him “unrestricted” shelf space, which allowed for more selection for his consumers. In addition, the expanded collection allowed him to reach the customers that aren’t into mainstream products, thus increasing market share and sales. This is called the Long Tail, which Chris Anderson delves into further in his article on Wired.com. For a better example of the Long Tail, take Amazon.com for instance. A typical Barnes & Noble offers a selection of 130,000 books whereas Amazon’s inventory is comprised of roughly 2.3 million books. Although Barnes & Noble offers the most popular and mainstream books available, they fail to account for the segment of customers interested in more obscure items. Amazon capitalizes on this by offering the niche fare that their offline competitors don’t. This is evident by more than half (57%) of Amazon’s book sales coming from outside the top 130,000 titles. The Long Tail proves that even though many consumers congregate towards the mainstream items, “there will always be real demand for niche fare found only online.”

BDH Bikes is just one of the many great examples of the advantages to using the Long Tail.

Adidas Beliebes in Bieber

Earlier this year, Adidas decided to expand their NEO sub-brand by targeting “teenage girls more influenced by music and fashion than sports.” They stated that they would be doing this through their social media platforms on Facebook and Twitter. The past few months has already seen NEO busy in action with campaigns like their love song digital promotion for Valentine’s Day, and convincing David Beckham to endorse a special shoe line within the sub-brand.

Today, Adidas brought along a new celebrity for the ride, I think you might recognise him…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8idGF7SgzcU&feature=player_embedded

Adidas Beliebes in Bieber

Adidas has “Bieber Fever”

Yes, Adidas has just signed off on a two-year partnership with Justin Bieber to be the new face of their NEO “Live Your Style” campaigns. This includes a “Find My Gold Shoes” contest via Facebook, in addition to sharing his favorite seasonal outfit combinations, which his fans will be able to purchase. Adidas believes Bieber’s strong influence over a global fan base is something they can capitalize on.

“He possesses an undeniable young, carefree, bold spirit and energy that is identical to the Adidas NEO Label. He lives his style in the everyday, but most certainly when he is performing through music and fashion.”

Customer Decision funnelWhat better way to attract a target market than by getting a main influencer within the category, Justin Bieber in this case, to endorse their brand? As I learned in class, influencers can play a huge role as customers reach the stage of researching and evaluating their options. When influencers endorse a product, they make customers narrow down their consideration set, which is full of your competitors. In addition, by focusing on a specific target market like this, they are further narrowing down the funnel by concentrating on a niche group of customers who are more likely to convert.  This will surely help to increase the chances of turning awareness into consideration, followed by intention and subsequently into purchases.

Best Buy Fights Back

Today I read an article on Time Business about Best Buy making two announcements which will take effect just in time for the upcoming holiday season:

  1. They would begin price matching online retailers
  2. They will offer free home delivery on merchandise that is out of stock in stores
Best Buy Price Match

In an attempt to combat the recent trend of “showrooming,” Best Buy will now match the prices of their online competitors

These changes are surely a retort to companies like Amazon.com, which as of late has been contributing to the recent trend of “showrooming” which has plagued brick-and-mortars like Best Buy over the past couple of years. “Showrooming,” for those that aren’t familiar with the term, is when a customer examines products in a brick-and-mortar store, and then purchases the same item online, usually at a cheaper price. As a result, it is estimated that Best Buy is host to around 15% of shoppers who come into their stores to test their products with the intent of purchasing online. This number has increased roughly 3% in past two years. In addition, it’s estimated that 43% of electronic buyers bought something online after checking it out in store.

Best Buy is taking these steps to improve the percentage of shoppers who actually enter their stores and leave with a purchase, which is currently about 40% of all shoppers. In addition, Best Buy believes that 20% of all “showrooming” shoppers end up making their purchase in the store, another figure which they would like to increase. “We have a tremendous opportunity to increase that close rate,” said Matthew Furman, a spokesman for Best Buy.

We Price Match Amazon.com

Expect to see more of these signs at your local Best Buy

Although it comes a bit late, I like this move by Best Buy. They acknowledged that they were missing out on sales and took action to increase their conversion rate, which has been in decline for quite some time. This suggests that they’re taking an honest look at their competition and recognizing that online retailing is becoming the preference for shoppers who purchase electronics. According to ShopperTrak, analysts have also forecasted that this trend will continue as foot traffic is expected to decrease by 8% in electronic stores this upcoming holiday season.

However, I see this move being successful in the short run as opposed to the long run. It’s estimated that overhead costs of brick-and-mortars add roughly 10% to prices, so it’ll be interesting to see whether or not Best Buy can survive by matching the lower prices of their online competitors as it will squeeze their margins even further. Doug Fleener, president of Dynamic Experiences Group shares these concerns.

“If you are willing to match price, you let competitors determine your profitability, and if customers know that, you’re only encouraging that behavior. This is not a sustainable strategy with the overhead Best Buy has, and limited time will mean nothing to consumers — there will be no going back.”

Will simply selling more by the volume fix their problem? What will happen come January when sales are sure to decrease after the holiday season? Is there a way to decrease their cost structure in order to remain competitive with e-commerce giants like Amazon? Only time will tell…

Blank You Very Much says Coca-Cola

Earlier this week, Coca-Cola launched a new crowdsourcing initiative on Blank You Very Much (BYVM), a platform where brands interact with their fan base by inviting their consumers to participate in various design contests. The contest doesn’t entail creating a new logo for Coke, but instead incorporating a design that will go on a t-shirt. Judged by a panel consisting of five fairly well-known people within the design industry, the winner will receive a $5000 cash prize in addition to their artwork being featured on a limited edition t-shirt.Coke Blank You Very Much

At first, I liked the idea of Coke interacting with its fans and customers and encouraging them to contribute to their company through an online contest. It’s a great way for Coke to appear more personable to the community by engaging them to create a positive design for the brand. However, as I thought more and more about it, I started to change my opinion on this initiative.

Submitted Designs

Some of the many designs Coke now retains the rights to

First and foremost, Coca-Cola is a multi-billion dollar company and the “grand prize” is only $5000? This pales greatly in comparison to some other crowdsourcing initiatives out there such as Pepsi’s Refresh Project which dishes out a combined $20 million, or The Netflix Prize which paid out $1 million to the winner. Secondly, as with most crowdsourcing initiatives, the rights to all the designs submitted are retained by the company. So in this case, BYVM and Coca-Cola will be free to use any submitted design at their discretion at any point in the future.

To me, this sounds more like exploitation than crowdsourcing. And after some research, I found I wasn’t the only one thinking this as well. Turns out AntiSpec founder Mark Collins has strongly voiced his opinion on the matter as well. In addition to some of the points I made above, he goes on to say:

“Aspiring designers don’t see the bigger picture. They don’t see that it devalues our profession. They don’t see that corporations like Coca-Cola are taking advantage for their own gain. All they see is the carrot dangling in front of them.”

Collins also thinks that these brands should be more responsible and be held accountable for their actions. He states:

“And the real shame is they probably do understand already, at least to a certain degree. Large successful businesses run on informed calculated decisions. Somebody at Coca-Cola decided that paying small change for thousands of hours of design work was too good to pass up.”

Yes I do realize that it’s a voluntary contest and that Coke isn’t forcing anyone to do their bidding or anything like that. And crowdsourcing isn’t always about extrinsic motivational factors like financial gain. Intrinsic motivational factors like personal pride, learning by practicing, developing a personal portfolio, striving to beat the competition, etc can all play a part into someone’s willingness to enter this contest.  So I guess it’s up for debate. Is crowdsourcing just a subtle way for corporations to exploit their participants? Is it only considered “exploitation” when it’s a large company at hand? You be the judge.