Author Archives: Connor DeFaveri

Lighting Our Future.

Thomas Edison submitted his patent for the light bulb in October 1878. He is widely known as the inventor of the light bulb but this is not entirely correct. There were over 20 ‘inventors’ of the light bulb dating back to 1802, far before Edison. So why does Edison get credit? He was the first one to make a commercially viable lightbulb. His lightbulb was longer lasting, as he removed the air from from the bulb so the filament wouldn’t burn up. It was much more energy efficient than the gas burning lamps used at the time, and it was relatively easy to manufacture. Finally, his bulb produced far less heat than the aforementioned gas lamps.  These qualities are still the benchmarks of lighting technology today. If a new technology wants to replace the old, it has to improve on some or all of these aspects.

Incandescent, Fluorescent and LED bulbs
Source: Google Free to share

Over the years we have seen three main generations of lighting technology; incandescent lamps, compact fluorescent tubes and most recently light emitting diodes or LEDs. While Edison’s incandescent bulbs were a huge step forward from gas lighting, they still only convert 5-10% of electrical energy to light while the rest is lost as heat. Compact fluorescent tubes are much more energy efficient, able to convert 75-85% of energy to light while lasting 10-15 times longer. Because of this, they are commonly used in large buildings, hospitals and office spaces. LED technology surpasses all of its predecessors, converting around 90% of energy to light and lasting 10 times longer than fluorescent bulbs.

Source: Science Direct

One major roadblock preventing LEDs from taking over the lighting industry is their high manufacturing cost. Many experts hope that one day, this obstacle can be overcome with OLED (organic light emitting diode) technology. OLEDs differ from conventional LEDs as they use organic, or carbon containing molecules as a light source.  

OLEDs have the advantage of being thin and flexible allowing them to be made into nearly any shape. They also produce a much wider range of colours, which has made them ideal for display screens. The newest generation of iPhones and LG TVs are being made with OLED technology.

The video below explains the light source in OLEDs.

YouTube Preview Image

LED has been given a while to mature as a technology, while OLED is relatively new and has a lot of room for improvement. Today’s OLED lights are less efficient than LED lights (25-50 lumens per watt vs 90-100 lumens per watt), but are still far superior to incandescent bulbs. Blue OLEDs also don’t last quite as long because fluorine is used in the molecule, making it quite unstable. Manufacturing OLEDs currently can cost an order of magnitude more than LEDs. Despite carbon’s abundance, many of the colours involve trace amounts of rare metals, such as iridium.  

Christopher Brown is a chemist at the University of British Columbia. He joined us in the podcast below to discuss how he thinks this cost can be reduced, and the future of lighting technology.

An Unlikely Hero

Conservation has entered the spotlight in recent years, but there is one resource shortage no amount of recycling can help: human organs. Every day 2o people die waiting for an organ transplant and this problem is only getting worse. From 1991 to 2015, the number of people on the transplant list in the US has risen by nearly 100, 000, while the number of donors has risen by less than 10, 000. This problem is exasperated as only 3 out of every 1000 deaths leave organs viable for transplant. Luckily Biologist Luhan Yang may have a solution with an unlikely face.

Source: Google

Yang literally hopes to bioengineer pigs into human organ farms. Yes, organ farms. Although it sounds crazy, xenotransplantation, the transplant of animal tissues/organs into people, is not a new concept. Pig and cow heart valves have been transplanted into humans as an alternative to mechanical valves for almost 50 years. But implanting a functional organ is very different than implanting a simple valve. 

Source: Flickr Commons

Pig and cow heart valves are treated with a variety of chemicals to preserve the tissue and prevent it from rejection by the immune system. Since the tissue is only preserved, it is not technically alive, which obviously would not work with an organ. To be of any use, an organ must be alive and fully connected to the rest of the body, which understandably presents some major problems.

The first problem is organ rejection. Everyone’s cells have protein “markers” displayed on their surface completely unique to the individual. Your immune system uses these to distinguish between what’s you and what isn’t, so it doesn’t accidentally attack itself. That’s why patients’ blood types AND protein types must match for a transplant to be successful. Even then, the recipient must spend the rest of their life taking anti-rejection medications. Even organs from close family members often don’t match well enough to risk the operation, so transplanting from an entirely different species is undoubtedly more difficult.

Source: Flickr Commons

The second problem is the potential spread of viruses. Pig and human anatomies share certain similarities, which makes them ideal to grow organs. But this means many of their diseases can also infect us, like the H1N1 swine flu outbreak in 2009. Specifically, the type of virus of concern is called an “endogenous retrovirus”. Retroviruses are a special type of virus able to open up an infected host’s DNA, and insert its own before repairing it. This means the virus is literally part of the pig’s genome, and therefore is exceptionally difficult to remove.

Source: Flickr Commons

This is where Yang comes in. She hopes to solve these issues by genetically modifying pigs using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. CRISPR is a revolutionary gene editing technique that  allows scientists to open organisms’ DNA up at specific locations to add or remove segments. In 2015, Yang’s team made history by successfully developing a method to remove 62 retroviruses from pig cells at once. It was the largest number of modifications ever done to a mammalian genome in one procedure. Then last year, her team produced 15 live piglets without any harmful retroviruses. Their next goal is to take CRISPR even further to produce what they call “Pig 2.0”. They hope to further modify pig’s DNA to make their organs more human-like, solving the problem of organ rejection.

Science, but no longer fiction.

For as long as I can remember, my interest in science and science fiction have been deeply connected. Every Marvel movie I see inevitably results in hours long “study breaks”, where I scour the internet for any information on how these spectacular technologies match up with real world science. Does it obey the laws of physics? If not, is there something similar that theoretically could? Do we have related technology now? How would it work?  Unsurprisingly, I’m not alone in this thinking. Countless inventions that have and will shape our society were initially conceived in fiction, including the atomic bomb, cell phones, self driving cars and many more.

Roddenberry, Gene. Star Trek. CBS Television Distribution, 1968.

Source: Star Trek

Most of the time, my Wikipedia rampages end with the second question: Is there something that theoretically could? This results in a lengthy hypothetical description of something that often doesn’t resemble its fictitious counterpart. So understandably, I get pretty excited when I see technology not only possible, but already close to becoming reality.

This is the case with the work recently published in Nature by Daniel Smalley, an electrical and computer engineering professor from Brigham Young University. The “Photophoretic-trap Volumetric display,” or more casually called “The Princess Leia Project,” is a revolutionary new 3D hologram design. The idea of 3D holograms is not a new one. Most famously, it has appeared in Star Wars with Princess Leia’s plea for help projected by R2D2, or the enormous head of Darth Sidious. More recently it has been popularized in films like Iron Man and Avatar.

Kershner, Irvin, director. Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back. Lusasfilms Ltd., 1980.

Source: Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back

Lucas, George, director. Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope. Lusasfilms Ltd., 1977.

Source: Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope

Ironically, none of these depictions are actually holograms. A holographic display specifically refers to an image projected in 2 dimensions. In other words, if you aren’t looking directly at it, the image will appear distorted like viewing a TV at a sharp angle. A Volumetric Display occupies 3D space, so it can be viewed clearly from any angle. Smalley is able to do this using a single cellulose particle, a component of plant fibre. This particle is trapped in the air using a set of invisible lasers which can move it around in a small circuit. Then another set of lasers illuminate the particle with different colours. If the particle is moved fast enough around this track, it appears to be a solid line to the human eye.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/lasers-trace-new-way-create-hovering-hologram-images?tgt=nr#video

Source: Science News

Though Smalley isn’t the first scientist to research 3D displays, his multi-laser design is the first able to incorporate colour. Due to the use of a single particle, his prototype images are restricted by size, ranging from about the size of a pea to a postage stamp. But if his design is improved, many particles could be used to create much larger images. With the right imagination, Smalley says “the sky becomes the limit.”

Video Below

YouTube Preview Image

By Connor DeFaveri