Author Archives: simrandeep gill

What is Cryptocurrency Mining and is it Profitable?

By now most people have heard of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, but where does this currency come from? Much like gold, there is a fixed amount of bitcoin, 21 million bitcoins to be exact. These bitcoins can be ‘mined’ using computers running a special algorithm. In the past miners would use old computer hardware, specifically GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) which are typically used for computer gaming. This meant it was very easy for someone with a gaming computer to make some extra money by letting their computer run the mining algorithm while they were not using their computer.

Gaming GPU: Wikipedia Commons

As cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin become more mainstream, its value skyrocketed. This drove more people to become miners. More miners and newer, more powerful GPUs in computers lead to many bitcoins being found. So far, this sounds great, so should you go out and buy a GPU and become a miner?

Bitcoin Prices: Wikipedia Commons

Here’s the catch; as more bitcoins are found, it quickly becomes much more difficult to mine. This is because of the way bitcoin is setup. Because there is a fixed amount, it is very easy to mine the first bitcoins, but as more are found, the remaining bitcoins become much more rare. This rarity and huge popularity causes the value of bitcoin to rapidly inflate, causing more people to become miners.

One might ask, is mining profitable? The answer is more complicated then you might expect. Back when miners were just using old computers to mine, the only cost they had to worry about was electricity, and yes it was very profitable. Nowadays you need much more powerful hardware and multiple GPUs to mine. Although GPUs have become more efficient, multiple GPUs will still consume a lot more electricity than a single older one. Not only that, GPU pricing has also sky-rocketed, much to the dismay of computer gamers. 

So with all these variables taken into consideration, let’s see what it would take to become a miner. First you would need an extremely powerful computer with as many GPUs as possible. For our example lets say we use 8 high-end GPUs. This system would cost around $18,000 and would make around $11 a day in profit (assuming your electricity rates are relatively low in your area). This means it would take over 4 years to just break even and that is assuming the cryptocurrency market remains stable, which it is notorious for being very unpredictable. So no it is not profitable to be a cryptocurrency miner using regular computer hardware, unless you already have the GPUs. Nowadays, you are better off using dedicated mining machines or just trading cryptocurrencies on the stock market, if you are trying to make some extra money.

Dedicated mining machine: Wikipedia Commons

 

 

 

Image

Is the mainstream media hurting science?

Most people learn about the world of science through media outlets such as newspapers, news broadcasters, and blog posts like this. Unless someone is in that particular field of science, there isn’t a need to have a deep understanding of the media article as it is just meant to entertain you and keep you engaged. After all mainstream media only really cares about how many views a post gets. This causes a problem; in order to appeal to a wider audience and grab more peoples attention, science articles are often exaggerated, over simplified and sometimes flat out wrong.

Mainstream media authors aren’t always science majors and that’s fine as long as they do their research, because if they don’t they are just propagating pseudoscience.

The setup of the experiment. Source: Wikipedia commons

An example of this is when scientists from the European particle physics laboratory, CERN, fired neutrinos (a sub atomic particle) through the earth to a detector in Gran Sasso. This normally would not be of any interest to the general public, but the results of the test were very abnormal. According to the data, the neutrinos traveled 0.002% faster than light. If this was true, it would mean Einsteins theory of relativity is wrong, and this would have huge implications in the world of physics. The scientists that did the experiment were understandably very skeptical of this result, but could not figure out what could have went wrong. They published their results in hopes that other physicists would spot their error, but then it leaked to the media and it went viral. Everyone was talking about it and people really believed  that the laws of physics really were broken.

A fiber optic cable. Source: Wikipedia commons

Soon after it came to light that the reason why they observed neutrinos going faster than the speed of light was because of a loose fiber optic cable that ruined their results. Although, the damage was already done. Many media outlets continued spreading the story and few backtracked and admitted the mistake.

The true story that everything is as we expected just isn’t interesting enough to publish, so people are left believing this false science. If the media wants to talk about science, they better do their research, otherwise it’s best if they talk about something else.