Category Archives: Science in News

What is Cryptocurrency Mining and is it Profitable?

By now most people have heard of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, but where does this currency come from? Much like gold, there is a fixed amount of bitcoin, 21 million bitcoins to be exact. These bitcoins can be ‘mined’ using computers running a special algorithm. In the past miners would use old computer hardware, specifically GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) which are typically used for computer gaming. This meant it was very easy for someone with a gaming computer to make some extra money by letting their computer run the mining algorithm while they were not using their computer.

Gaming GPU: Wikipedia Commons

As cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin become more mainstream, its value skyrocketed. This drove more people to become miners. More miners and newer, more powerful GPUs in computers lead to many bitcoins being found. So far, this sounds great, so should you go out and buy a GPU and become a miner?

Bitcoin Prices: Wikipedia Commons

Here’s the catch; as more bitcoins are found, it quickly becomes much more difficult to mine. This is because of the way bitcoin is setup. Because there is a fixed amount, it is very easy to mine the first bitcoins, but as more are found, the remaining bitcoins become much more rare. This rarity and huge popularity causes the value of bitcoin to rapidly inflate, causing more people to become miners.

One might ask, is mining profitable? The answer is more complicated then you might expect. Back when miners were just using old computers to mine, the only cost they had to worry about was electricity, and yes it was very profitable. Nowadays you need much more powerful hardware and multiple GPUs to mine. Although GPUs have become more efficient, multiple GPUs will still consume a lot more electricity than a single older one. Not only that, GPU pricing has also sky-rocketed, much to the dismay of computer gamers. 

So with all these variables taken into consideration, let’s see what it would take to become a miner. First you would need an extremely powerful computer with as many GPUs as possible. For our example lets say we use 8 high-end GPUs. This system would cost around $18,000 and would make around $11 a day in profit (assuming your electricity rates are relatively low in your area). This means it would take over 4 years to just break even and that is assuming the cryptocurrency market remains stable, which it is notorious for being very unpredictable. So no it is not profitable to be a cryptocurrency miner using regular computer hardware, unless you already have the GPUs. Nowadays, you are better off using dedicated mining machines or just trading cryptocurrencies on the stock market, if you are trying to make some extra money.

Dedicated mining machine: Wikipedia Commons

 

 

 

Will electric cars fully replace combustion engine cars in the future?

Vehicle emission is one of the largest contributions to air pollution in the world. In order to reduce exhausts, people can choose to drive electric cars. Although electric cars seem to be more environmentally friendly, in my view, petrol and diesel-fueled cars cannot be completely replaced in the future because of their convenience and efficiency.

Electric cars vs. diesel-fueled cars; Photo courtesy by Chris Tosic

In terms of fuel efficiency, fuel-filling cars are more efficient than electric cars. Due to the limited capacity of batteries, fully charged electric cars normally cannot drive as far as fully fueled petrol and diesel cars. The usual battery life for today’s electric cars is about 100 to 150 kilometers. However, a fully fueled car with combustion engine can travel at least 400 to 500 kilometers normally. Although today’s most popular electric car brand “Tesla” has developed more powerful batteries for their electric cars to allow the driving distance to increase up to 572 kilometers, the price of the car with higher electric capacity becomes so high that it can be economically inefficient.
Apart from driving distance, the way of getting energy is another big concern for electric cars. In today’s community, we can find a lot more fuel-filling stations than electric charging stations in cities. Here is an example for the United States:

NO. of US Gas Stations VS. Electric Charging Stations; Data table provided by Loren McDonald

Moreover, the fuel charging only takes a few seconds or minutes to complete. In this case, we do not need to worry if the car does not have much fuel left. Conversely, electric cars take a much longer time to charge, and we do not have many electric charging stations in the city at present. For example, the total time required for a Tesla “90kWh Model S” electric car to be fully charged at a 30A public charging station is about 17.8 hours; even “Tesla Supercharger Station,” which is recognized as worlds’ fastest charging station, still takes 75 minutes to recharge an electric car. As we know, the higher capacity battery takes longer charging time. Therefore, petrol and diesel-fueled cars save much more time on fueling and cannot be completely replaced by the inconvenient electric cars.

In the future, people may develop more advanced electric cars that require shorter charging time and have longer battery life. It is important to note that recycling of large batteries may also become a significant environmental issue. Consequently, there are still many challenges in the development of advanced electric cars.
By Jenny Tang

Washing your Clothes: Hygiene or Pollution?

Whether you roll out of bed and slap on whatever you can find laying around, or are a regular attendee of Shopaholics Anonymous, you at one point wear and wash your clothing. Did you know however, that washing your clothes is actually doing more harm than good?

Early Electric Washing Machines
Published under the Creative Commons License; photo courtesy of a Wikimedia User

The Problem

For centuries, people have been washing their clothes to rid them of the foul odours and bacteria build up; with the invention of the electric washing machine in the early twentieth century, washing clothes has since become a common household chore.  However, what the masses neglect to realize with every load of laundry they do, is the fact that millions of tiny fibres, known as microplastics, are released into the water ways, which, eventually find their way to the ocean.

Many recent studies have been targeted at investigating the exact amounts of microplastics released each time a load of laundry is washed. One such study showed that an average 13-pound load of laundry can release five-hundred thousand fibres from polyester and close to one million from acrylic-based clothing.  The numbers are shocking.

Ocean Plastic Pollution Published under the Creative Commons License; photo courtesy of Wikimedia User Kevin Krejci

In fact, one of the worst culprits in polluting the World’s Oceans is the water-repellent raincoat. Chances are, most people have at least one rain jacket hanging in their closet. These jackets are made up of special microplastics known as Perfluorinated Chemicals, or PFCs. They give the raincoat its waterproofing properties but are shed when washed. Once in the oceans, they do not break down. These fibres, which are not visible to the human eye, pose massive threats to, and have adverse effects on marine life. Studies have shown that fish are particularly prone to the effects of microplastics. When they ingest microplastics, it is not passed out as waste. Therefore, they accumulate. Consequently, their digestion is affected, and many organisms do not survive to the age where they can reproduce, destroying entire ecosystems.

The video below shows the the rising threat of such a problem and highlights that immediate action needs to be taken.

YouTube Preview Image

Video from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHCgA-n5wRw

What can we do to help?

A practical solution that we can implement in our own lives is making changes to our shopping and washing habits. For instance, instead of buying many cheap basics loaded with synthetic fibres with the expectation that they last a year and then are dumped away, it is better to buy a few quality items that are not composed of as many synthetic fibres. Furthermore, as oppose to washing clothes on a daily basis or in high frequency, it is better to wash them less regularly. Lastly, we can take it upon ourselves to hand wash out clothes and then instead of throwing the water down the drain, where it will end up in the oceans, perhaps use the waste water to water the garden or other agriculture. Simple solutions like this can prevent the shedding of massive amounts of synthetic fibres into the ocean, and reduce the risks faced by marine life.

By: Wesley Louie

There Is a Decrease in Blood Donations and It Is Concerning for All of Us

Courtesy of SciTechTrend

Blood, the ‘liquid of life’, is absolutely necessary for bodily functions. However, many people have diseases which renders their blood insufficient for necessary processes.  Therefore, many families strongly rely on blood donations to save their loved ones from life-threatening conditions.

The journey of giving blood can be an exciting one for some, but for many it is not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bpVqPFTja4

The organization in England responsible for handling blood donations, NHS Blood and Transplant, revealed that there were 40% less new donors compared to about a decade ago. “Regular donations are crucial to saving and improving the lives of patients with cancer, blood disorders and those suffering medical trauma or undergoing surgery”, says the organization. Without consistent blood donations, hospitals may not have blood available when patients need it.

Courtesy of user ‘brian’ (Flickr Commons)

One of the main causes of this decrease can be attributed to cultural changes among generations. President and Chief Executive of Bloodworks Northwest in Seattle, James AuBuchon, said “The older generations seemed to have internalized the message that we always have to have an adequate supply of blood on the shelves. The younger generations just seem less wired toward that message.”

International non-profit organization specializing in transfusion and cell therapy, AABB, found in their research that 60% of blood donations come from people over 40, and nearly 50% come from people older than 50.

It isn’t cool anymore to donate blood. For those that grew up during war times and Baby Boomers, blood donation was seen as a noble duty. Donating blood was a civic obligation. Marie Forrestal, president of the Association of Donor Recruitment Professionals, emphasizes that “It was a cultural thing to donate.”

Courtesy of Bloodcenters.org

Furthermore, lack of education about donating blood is another cause. Almost half (48%) of the people responding to a survey by NHS Blood and Transplant think friends are family are asked to donate when a patient needs blood. Donating blood is seen as reactive, instead of a proactive procedure. A surprising 13% think that synthetic blood is created in emergencies (which is definitely not true!)

To counter this issue, two things need to be done. Let’s increase recruitment of high school and university student donors. This can be done through organizations, such as Red Cross, hosting more high school and college blood drives. This tactic has proven to work as 16-18 and 19-22 year olds now account for 20% of blood donation, which is an increase compared to previous years.

Next, the common misconceptions about blood need to be addressed in elementary schools. If the government improves the school curriculum to incorporate discussions about blood, the future generation will be better equipped with the knowledge to make the decision about whether to donate.

All in all, a future without blood transfusions is a dark one. Without regular blood donations, we increase the risk of losing our loved ones to blood disorders. However, it isn’t too late. With the help of the younger generation, we can still make the future a ‘bloody’ one.

By Misam Ibrahimi

Science, but no longer fiction.

For as long as I can remember, my interest in science and science fiction have been deeply connected. Every Marvel movie I see inevitably results in hours long “study breaks”, where I scour the internet for any information on how these spectacular technologies match up with real world science. Does it obey the laws of physics? If not, is there something similar that theoretically could? Do we have related technology now? How would it work?  Unsurprisingly, I’m not alone in this thinking. Countless inventions that have and will shape our society were initially conceived in fiction, including the atomic bomb, cell phones, self driving cars and many more.

Roddenberry, Gene. Star Trek. CBS Television Distribution, 1968.

Source: Star Trek

Most of the time, my Wikipedia rampages end with the second question: Is there something that theoretically could? This results in a lengthy hypothetical description of something that often doesn’t resemble its fictitious counterpart. So understandably, I get pretty excited when I see technology not only possible, but already close to becoming reality.

This is the case with the work recently published in Nature by Daniel Smalley, an electrical and computer engineering professor from Brigham Young University. The “Photophoretic-trap Volumetric display,” or more casually called “The Princess Leia Project,” is a revolutionary new 3D hologram design. The idea of 3D holograms is not a new one. Most famously, it has appeared in Star Wars with Princess Leia’s plea for help projected by R2D2, or the enormous head of Darth Sidious. More recently it has been popularized in films like Iron Man and Avatar.

Kershner, Irvin, director. Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back. Lusasfilms Ltd., 1980.

Source: Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back

Lucas, George, director. Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope. Lusasfilms Ltd., 1977.

Source: Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope

Ironically, none of these depictions are actually holograms. A holographic display specifically refers to an image projected in 2 dimensions. In other words, if you aren’t looking directly at it, the image will appear distorted like viewing a TV at a sharp angle. A Volumetric Display occupies 3D space, so it can be viewed clearly from any angle. Smalley is able to do this using a single cellulose particle, a component of plant fibre. This particle is trapped in the air using a set of invisible lasers which can move it around in a small circuit. Then another set of lasers illuminate the particle with different colours. If the particle is moved fast enough around this track, it appears to be a solid line to the human eye.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/lasers-trace-new-way-create-hovering-hologram-images?tgt=nr#video

Source: Science News

Though Smalley isn’t the first scientist to research 3D displays, his multi-laser design is the first able to incorporate colour. Due to the use of a single particle, his prototype images are restricted by size, ranging from about the size of a pea to a postage stamp. But if his design is improved, many particles could be used to create much larger images. With the right imagination, Smalley says “the sky becomes the limit.”

Video Below

YouTube Preview Image

By Connor DeFaveri