Tag Archives: media

Image

Is the mainstream media hurting science?

Most people learn about the world of science through media outlets such as newspapers, news broadcasters, and blog posts like this. Unless someone is in that particular field of science, there isn’t a need to have a deep understanding of the media article as it is just meant to entertain you and keep you engaged. After all mainstream media only really cares about how many views a post gets. This causes a problem; in order to appeal to a wider audience and grab more peoples attention, science articles are often exaggerated, over simplified and sometimes flat out wrong.

Mainstream media authors aren’t always science majors and that’s fine as long as they do their research, because if they don’t they are just propagating pseudoscience.

The setup of the experiment. Source: Wikipedia commons

An example of this is when scientists from the European particle physics laboratory, CERN, fired neutrinos (a sub atomic particle) through the earth to a detector in Gran Sasso. This normally would not be of any interest to the general public, but the results of the test were very abnormal. According to the data, the neutrinos traveled 0.002% faster than light. If this was true, it would mean Einsteins theory of relativity is wrong, and this would have huge implications in the world of physics. The scientists that did the experiment were understandably very skeptical of this result, but could not figure out what could have went wrong. They published their results in hopes that other physicists would spot their error, but then it leaked to the media and it went viral. Everyone was talking about it and people really believed  that the laws of physics really were broken.

A fiber optic cable. Source: Wikipedia commons

Soon after it came to light that the reason why they observed neutrinos going faster than the speed of light was because of a loose fiber optic cable that ruined their results. Although, the damage was already done. Many media outlets continued spreading the story and few backtracked and admitted the mistake.

The true story that everything is as we expected just isn’t interesting enough to publish, so people are left believing this false science. If the media wants to talk about science, they better do their research, otherwise it’s best if they talk about something else.

“Gluten-Free” – Is it as Healthy as We Think?

I’m guessing that the majority of you have seen the increasingly popular “gluten-free” diet trend displayed in many health-related magazines, books or even talk shows. But why is everybody so obsessed with this new diet fad? Well, apparently, it’s supposed to be one of the healthiest changes that you can make to your lifestyle. One scientific study even suggests that a gluten-free diet can reduce the level of “bad” fats in your blood that lead to heart disease, but is gluten-free really as healthy as it’s claimed to be?

Gluten-Free Bread; photo courtesy of Pixabay user Aline Ponce

Being “gluten-free” first arose as a treatment for individuals with celiac disease, a disorder that causes damage to the small intestine from ingesting gluten. Celiacs experience many symptoms, ranging from severe gastrointestinal issues to even developing anemia and behavioural changes. Unfortunately, the only real way to combat this is through the complete elimination of gluten from one’s diet.

Gluten is a protein found in wheat, barley, and rye. As awareness of celiac disease has increased, so have gluten-free alternatives to popular foods. As a response, many non-celiacs have been transitioning to this diet as well, assuming that it is a healthier lifestyle. However, relatively new evidence suggests that being “gluten-free” isn’t as beneficial to your health as you may believe.

Dr. Travis speaks about the gluten-free diet industry.

YouTube Preview Image

 

In Digestive Diseases and Sciences, a study observed the risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease among non-celiac individuals following a gluten-free diet. The study concluded that there was an association between being gluten-free and weight management, but this is likely because gluten-free individuals do not consume refined wheat products, which are harmful to your health. Interestingly, there was no difference in the risk of metabolic disease or heart disease between gluten-free and non-gluten-free individuals.

Additionally, the Mayo Clinic suggests that those who are adopting a gluten-free diet should be wary of losing some essential vitamins and nutrients, like iron, calcium, and fiber. Whole grains are usually enriched in these, so you would have to be diligent in finding them in other sources.

Gluten-Free Mix; photo courtesy of Flickr user, ‘theimpulsivebuy’

Gluten-free individuals should also be mindful of the fact that many store-bought, gluten-free foods are no better for you than the versions made with gluten. This is because many of these foods actually contain more sugar, fat, and calories than the original versions, leading to weight-gain rather than weight-loss. It is a common misconception that just because something is “gluten-free,” it is also healthier.

Overall, the stance on whether or not a gluten-free diet is beneficial to non-celiacs is very controversial. As long as one is aware of what is actually inside the gluten-free foods that they are consuming, as well as of all the daily nutrients that they should be obtaining, then this diet is potentially beneficial. Although, it may not be worth it if whole grains, in moderation, have shown no detrimental effect on health. The most important thing for non-celiacs to remember is that a “gluten-free” label does not automatically equal “healthy.”

By Silvana Jakupovic

Here’s Why Coffee Is Good for Your Health

We all love our morning coffee. Photo courtesy of blogTO

Coffee has existed since approximately the 15th century – and over these years it has amassed a lot of confusion about its effect on your health.  The media has played a role in pushing a negative view towards the effects of coffee. Us coffee lovers have always had a family member or friend comment with an expression of concern regarding our love for coffee.  It’s about time coffee drinkers put an end to this narrative!

Well, if you are a huge coffee lover, you will be happy to know that scientists have discovered that there is no connection between coffee and an increased risk of cancer or heart disease. In fact, the Universities of Southampton and Edinburgh published a meta-analysis investigating the effects of coffee on health. Amazingly enough, the paper used an extensive sample size analyzing over 200 papers! They found that drinking three to four cups of coffee a day may actually improve your health. Furthermore, they concluded that those who drank coffee were 17% less likely to die an early death, 19% less likely to die of heart disease and 18% less likely to develop cancer, compared to people who did not drink coffee.

Courtesy of Harvard School of Public Health

How does coffee work? The active ingredient in coffee is caffeine. Caffeine stimulates your brain and increases your alertness. Coffee also contains a lot of antioxidants, which are molecules that prevent damage that can cause cancer. Reactive molecules called “free radicals” attack our body and damage cells. Antioxidants stabilizes the oxidants, thus stopping them from harming our body!

David Heber, director of Center of Human Nutrition, UCLA discusses the effects of coffee.

Okay, now we know coffee can be healthy, but we also know that too much of anything is bad. How much coffee is too much coffee? Health Canada recommends adults limit caffeine intake to no more than 400mg/day. This is approximately three 8-ounce cups of coffee. Surpassing these limits could result in increased heart rate, changes in sleep patterns, heartburn, and more.

Remember that it in order to maximize coffee’s health benefits, minimize the amount of cream and sugar you put in your coffee. Sugar can singlehandedly nullify the positive effects you would get from coffee.

Robert Poole, the lead author of this study, says that these findings are “reassuring for coffee drinkers, as long as they drink in moderation”. Future studies will ideally pinpoint which type of coffee beans will have the greatest health benefit.

By Misam Ibrahimi

Video

Is Chocolate Really Good for your Health?

Ever have that craving for a hit of sugar or the pick-me-up that chocolate delivers? Justify your guilty pleasure by agreeing with the notion that chocolate is good for you? If you answered yes to the any of the above questions, you have just admitted to being a victim of the media’s portrayal of scientific findings.

Chocolate Bars
Published under the Creative Commons License; photo courtesy of Wikimedia user André Karwath.

In recent years, many scientific studies claimed to have proven that chocolate is the next best thing you can eat. Studies conducted by researchers at prestigious universities such as Columbia have targeted and provided evidence for how chocolate helps to reduce memory loss, on a small number of subjects in a very controlled environment. This research finding was published in the media and ballooned by the press, even though it failed to mention that the study was minuscule and that it did not even use chocolate, but rather chocolate flavouring. In addition, when the New York Times, a seemingly credible and well-read media outlet got whiff of the research, they promoted only the positive aspect of how chocolate improves memory, but did not describe the size of the study or the subjects involved. This lack of knowledge reduces the credibility of the article, but nevertheless is believed by readers. The media has a strong impact on what the everyday person believes, and exaggerating scientific findings can be dangerous.

Blood Pressure Monitor
Published under the Creative Commons License; photo courtesy of Wikimedia user Amirhossein Ashrafzadeh.

Furthermore, other studies conducted on the health benefits of chocolate have made the claims that chocolate promotes lower blood pressure, which ultimately reduce the cases of cardiovascular disease. Once again, the media has taken these findings and brainwashed hoards of people suffering from high blood pressure to run to their local supermarkets and load up on the kit-kat. What the media did not mention was the fact that while cocoa has been shown to reduce blood pressure, the research conducted was only on a short time scale; the long-term effects are unknown. Moreover, when chocolate is made, the cocoa is severely degraded as it gets mixed in with sugars and other additives, so the results of the study may not hold true in store bought chocolate products. Again, the media chose not to disclose this to its audience and we are left believing that chocolate will cure high blood pressure. Without all the information, it is scary to think that we let ourselves fall into the “whatever is in the news must be true,” epidemic.

The video below exposes an unbiased view on the benefits, or lack thereof of chocolate.

YouTube Preview Image

Video From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtaUKweEVhY

The case study on chocolate just presents one instance of when the media has taken up studies and hyped up their findings, regardless of their validity, fooling the nation into believing myths. So the next question is, what will the news have us believe tomorrow?

By: Wesley Louie