Categories
Uncategorized

Large Corporations Hold Out Capital Until There Is Economic Improvement

Large corporations are borrowing extensive amounts of money from the banks in order to put aside capital until the economy improves.  The question arises as to when corporations will build confidence to start spending their money, which would boost the economy and the unemployment rate.  The reasoning behind why businesses are withholding these funds is because perhaps they are concerned that the economy could fall back into economic recession.  Also businesses need to be worried about making ethical investments that are smart and worthwhile.  One benefit to these extensive loans is that when the economy improves corporations “will be strong, well capitalized and ready to act aggressively when executives finally decide it is time to expand their businesses.”

So far this year, United States companies have borrowed a total of $488 billion.  The money borrowed so far this year is 7 percent larger than what businesses borrowed throughout all of 2009.  The $488 billion borrowed this year is similar to the $589 billion that was borrowed throughout the year 2007.  One downside to these loans is that smaller businesses and corporation are struggling to take out loans because most of the financing is restricted to bigger corporations.  Although it is quite reasonable for corporations to capitalize on the opportunity to take out loans at a low interest rate it is questionable as to whether it will benefit the economy.

Sources: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/04/business/04borrow.html?pagewanted=1&ref=business&src=me

Categories
Uncategorized

Facebook Publicizes 5-for-1 Split Stock

On Friday October 1, 2010 Facebook announced that they would be splitting their stock shares 5-for-1.  The company’s shares will be divided due to the fact of increasing demand for stock shares in Facebook.  Online social networking has skyrocketed globally in the past decade, which has created numerous opportunities for this company to expand in the stock market.  Although the stock split will not change the overall value of the stock, the purpose of this stock split was arranged to bring down the value of each stock price in order to maintain a more reasonable stock value for this privately held company.  This stock split will also enlarge the stock grants Facebook can provide to its employees. Another progressive aspect of this stock split is the impact it will have on the investors.  A stock split broadens the appeal of the stock price to its investors.  When the price decreases per stock share the willingness to buy the stock share will increase.  This stock split also arises the question as to whether Facebook may pursue a public offering in the future.  It will be very intriguing to see what direction Facebook takes in the stock market and the impact this stock split will have on its investors.

Resources: http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/01/facebook-announces-5-to-1-stock-split/

Categories
Uncategorized

TicketMaster Goes After The Secondary Market

Recently, leading ticket sales company TicketMaster has decided to initiate their entrance into the secondary market of ticket sales.  The secondary market is where tickets are resold for events that have sold out.  This entrance into the has infuriated loyal customers who are tired of paying unnecessary hidden fees such as “service charges” and “convenience charges.”  In the original sales of tickets through TicketMaster there are numerous hidden fees.  The fees include “service charges,”  “Building facility charges,”  “Processing charges,” and “Shipping or Will Call charges.”  In certain instances these hidden fees can add up to 75% of the tickets face value.  As of 2008, TicketMaster acquired the company TicketsNow that was designed to resell tickets in the secondary market.  TicketsNow also includes these “Hidden fees” when you purchase from their website. This arises the question as to whether it is fair for TicketMaster and TicketsNow to double their profits in sales of the primary and secondary ticket market.  I believe this has initiated an enormous controversy, as TicketMaster and TicketsNow are a monopoly of the primary and secondary sales market.  This leaves Tickets customers with no choice but to condone these extensive “service charges” that are costing up to an extra 75% of the original price.  In spite of this ticket monopoly, I believe there needs to be a regulation enforced on how much money can be charged through “hidden fees” in both the primary and secondary market of ticket sales.

Resources:  http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/2009/new_home_nightmares/busted.html

Spam prevention powered by Akismet