I found defining cryptography to be quite a challenge. The main problem is that cryptography is a very deep and complicated subject, rooted in computer science theory. It’s a highly mathematical subject when studied carefully. For this reason, defining it to a very general audience is difficult. This requires you to simplify the topic heavily, without becoming too vague. Overall, my approach was to explain the applications of cryptography, leaving out the mathematical details.
The peer review of my definitions was extremely useful. James (the reviewer of my writing) pointed out a key point I missed, which was to directly address the audience I was writing for. This is an important point, since depending on the readers, the level of detail and rigour may need to be adjusted. He also suggested some smaller changes, such as giving a description with my chosen image for my definition. I found this helpful, as in retrospect, this may have made the image more effective in describing cryptography.
In reviewing James’ work, I was able to think of ways to improve my own writing in the future. His use of bullet points in his assignment made his ideas come across clearly. This made me consider how I may want to use point form in future similar assignments I complete. He also structured his parenthetical definition differently than I did, which in combination with his peer review, helped me improve my own work when I went back to edit it.
Overall, I found the peer review process, along with writing this blog, an invaluable experience that helped me improve my own writing skills.
Click here to go to the peer review of my work.
Attached Edited Assignment: Definition of Cryptography