Response to Emilie Gibeau’s post.
Over the past few decades, there has been a cultural shift in the way businesses are run as a result of changing consumer values. It has become more important that not only are companies producing quality goods or services, but they are doing so in an ethical manner. As corporate social responsibility becomes more of a priority to consumers, businesses have to respond appropriately.
However, in reading Emilie Gibeau’s post, I realize that it is hypocritical of us, as consumers, to critique these companies for using cheap labour when we continue to buy from them. It is also unfair to continually expect low prices and at the same time slander companies for trying to cut costs and make a profit. It is important to understand that in order to offer low prices, companies must maintain a low-cost supply chain, and the easiest way of doing so is by cutting manufacturing costs.
Whether we are discussing the purchase of cheap clothing (issue of labour) or organic foods (environmental issue), the question remains: are we as consumers willing to spend more for products that we know are ethically manufactured? Unfortunately, for the majority of the population, the answer is no.
Sources:
https://blogs.ubc.ca/emiliegibeau/2013/11/14/the-hidden-cost-of-cheap-clothing/
http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2013/05/17/who-made-your-t-shirt-the-hidden-cost-of-cheap-fashion/