Hello fellow blog readers;
The subject of today is no laughing thing, it is related to carbon emitions, global warming and the end of the world! (ok that last part went to far… or did it?)
I was recently reading Tom Rattray’s marketing blog and found extremely interesting a post regarding carbon offsetting. And I read about this company called Carbon Offsets, and their projects to reduce carbon emissions. Within their website they posted a series of ideas to reduce carbon emissions, and a simple calculator to calculate how much it would cost for you to balance those emissions with carbon offsets. Despite the fact I really liked the intention of this company I did not agree with most of it.
First off many of the information contained in the website is measured as an estimate, and as standard throughout different situations. Secondly it has many “green ideas”, that when measured in a complete life cycle analysis they will produce more carbon than what they are earning. For example the use of ethanol instead of gasoline for automobile combustion. Even though the ethanol burns cleaner than the gasoline and does not release as much CO2, it is really hard to produce. In fact to produce ethanol one needs to use more energy than the extracted ethanol is producing.
The Carbon Reduction company has a great goal and is really advanced in the topic. But they need to conduct far more research into their ideas, inovations and measurements. Especially before charging 150 dollars to a person so they achieve “carbon neutral”.
But then why do people or businesses pay so much to be branded with this inaccurate, “carbon neutral” stamp?Because of the image this brand portrays. People want to buy from a company that is not killing the world. That has been the emphasis of Toyota and it has worked perfectly. Few people know that the manufacturing of GM is far more environmentally friendly than that of Toyota. And this information is really hard to get, specially since Toyota does not release public statements regarding the environmental footprint of their productions.

David Dana