Black Friday/Cyber Monday: Mobile Analytics

This past weekend was the much advertised and vaunted “Black Friday” and “Cyber Monday”  US Thanksgiving holiday sales events.  An interesting article on TechCrunch (link here) cites data from Branding Brand, a mobile commerce startup that analyzes retail shopping data specifically on mobile devices and smartphones (a client list is below)

that shows a 221% increase year over year in smartphone only mobile commerce on Thanksgiving and a 128% increase on Black Friday during the same period.  What is interesting apart from the numbers themselves (which obviously show a great increase in sales through smartphones) is how they are derived.  This article specifies sales data from smartphones or mobile devices, rather than lumping it with all e-commerce as has been done in the past.

With the growth of smartphone usage for mobile purchasing analytics were sure to follow and I think there is a definite need to distinguish between true mobile purchasing and simply using a standard website through a mobile device.  As stated by Branding Brand’s CEO, “most industry reports capture overall mobile usage, a true chasm of analytical performance data exists between how people use mobilized and non-mobilized websites.”  This blends nicely with the idea that customized dashboards are a requirement for companies that want to be active in social media and mobile commerce.  In the past a company may not have cared if a sale came through its website from a desktop user or mobile user, just that they made a sale.  However now companies will want to know if the money they are investing in a mobile optimized site is paying off and if they are losing customers whom are frustrated with the “pinching and zooming” associated with navigating a desktop site on a mobile device.

Analytics aren’t going away any time soon and with increased smartphone use comes increased smartphone analytics, for every weekend of the year.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Nashville Predators’ “Smash Mob”: Creative or I’ve seen that before?

A couple weeks ago I wrote about how the NHL players are using twitter and social media in an attempt to win the PR battle of the NHL lockout.  While it appears the NHL’s Nashville Predators (the organization itself, not its players) have taken notice and creatively constructed their own public relations event.  The Predators’ coaches, cheerleaders, dance team, anthem singer and announcer surprised two minor league teams in Nashville to create a once in a lifetime experience for the youth players.  Here is a video of the “Smash Mob”.  (of note: Nashville is popularly referred to as “Smashville” around NHL circles):

Two interesting elements of the video are things we have seen before in marketing campaigns.  Surprising youth hockey players is something the NHLPA players have been doing with the #foundaplacetostake campaign (An example here).  And the flash mob at a hockey game was popularized last February when Budweiser ran its “Flash Fans” campaign below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0qZYqdsYAg

Initially it might seem as though the Predators are not being very creative, rather just cherry picking other successful ideas.  But the video succeeded in going viral after it was picked up by Deadspin (link here) and Yahoo Sports’ Puck Daddy Blog (link here), both are sports blogs with very heavy traffic.  One might infer that the move was as much about showing the NHL owner’s have a heart as it was about showing they care about the next generation of hockey fans but either way the by product was a once in a lifetime experience for 30 kids, what’s the harm in that?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Instagram online profiles: what now?

Instagram announced this week that they will be offering a web companion to their photo sharing and filtering app.  (Mashable article here)

One can assume that Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram earlier this year provided them the financial backing to support the move online but why do so now?  Instagram has been one of the few social network apps that started as an app and seemed content to stay there rather than employ an online presence as well.  Their stated reason as per the company’s blog is, “We’re launching web profiles to give you a simple way to share your photos with more people and to make it easier to discover new users on the web.”  However I doubt they are doing it out of the goodness of their hearts.  One guess is that it will provide them with a better avenue for advertising revenue.  Facebook’s IPO filings shed light on how reliant they are on online advertising dollars and the difficulties they have found with mobile advertising.  Perhaps the 100 million new online profiles that Instagram creates will be valuable real estate for online advertising.  Note: as of now there is no advertising on the website I am just guessing there will be eventually.

What does this mean for marketers?  It instantly becomes another presence that companies/brands will want to leverage.  It may make it easier for a large company like Nike (their profile) to manage their profile once users are able to upload photos online (which they are currently not able to do).  It may also lead to a wave of companies whom have previously dismissed the technology because it is difficult to manage from a corporate perspective on mobile to create new profiles.  The question they should really be asking is why?  But instead many may find themselves asking how, as in how fast can we get a profile up and running?  And the result could be more social media… done poorly.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Grouped: How small groups of friends are the key to influence on the social web – reviewed

Grouped: How small groups of friends are the key to influence on the social web by Paul Adams is a very enjoyable read for anyone interested in social media marketing or social anthropology and its application to the online world.  I choose Grouped because I am interested in social media marketing, due to a startup mobile app project I am involved in, and also because it was published in November 2011 making the content and examples very current.  Grouped is structured around the idea that humans are social animals and have been so for hundreds of years.  As such, our habits and behaviours offline are now catching up to our activity online.  The main argument is that individuals are very connected online, specifically in many small groups with people of very similar interests, and it is more important to focus on these small, connected groups of people rather than one or two highly influential individuals.

The author presents many thoughtful ideas/themes for marketers to consider when using social media (web) and does so in a convincing manner.  Three areas of interest (and the implications that accompany them) for marketers are:

–       the traditional customer acquisition funnel is no longer a one way, linear street, instead it is a loop with feedback involved throughout

–       despite the fact we have large online followings and networks of friends we really only communicate with a small group of friends and do so very directly, so the size (magnitude of their following) of the influencer may not be as important as previously thought

–       companies that use social media to promote their brands are better served moving away from interruption marketing (shouting as its commonly referred to) towards permission marketing, customers will communicate with you but only if they agree to it before hand

Grouped presents a similar argument to this McKinsey article in that the traditional customer acquisition funnel is no longer a linear, one way street, instead it is a feedback loop where social media can influence customer’s decisions at all stages.  This is especially evident in the post purchase stages.  Social media has allowed companies to create brand advocates and empower them to speak highly of the brand to their friends, thus bringing more people into the beginning of the funnel.  Social technology like Twitter, Facebook and blogs are where much of this brand advocacy takes place.  I think this relates well to Groundswell’s technographics segmentation in that the conversationalists, critics and creators can all become brand advocates much easier in the online world compared to offline.  This also benefits the spectators and collectors who can now easily access information while they are literally in the funnel, like a retail store for example.

Another interesting point the book presents is that despite the large followings and networks of friends we have offline and online we really only communicate on a personal level with a small number of people.  This is evidenced by some facts from the book, “80% of our phone calls are to the same 4 people, despite having contact/phonebooks of hundreds of people” and, “62% of our conversations are with the people closest to us”.  The implication here for marketers is that rather than communicating at individuals or trying to shout at them marketers need to employ permission marketing where potential consumers allow marketers to speak to them through permission such as “liking or following” a brand on social networks.  From there companies/brands can communicate on a personal, more intimate level, which will create a better result than targeting the masses with generic content.  This also translates well to the earned, owned, paid model.  Increasing the earned and owned marketing presence of a brand through social media is far more cost effective than a paid vehicle.

This relates to another argument in the book that contradicts Malcolm Gladwell’s “Law of the Few” that states that there are a small number of very influential people in society and if you reach and influence them they will influence hundreds and thousands more.  Grouped argues that is how the world works in theory, but not in real practice as noted in chapter 5, “highly connected does not mean highly influential”.  The author backs up this assertion with this stat, “Twitter users with the most followers do not necessarily have the greatest number of retweets or the greatest number of mentions.”  What drives this point home is Duncan Watts’ research that the most important factor in determining whether an idea spread was not whether there was influential people, but whether there was a critical mass of easily influenced people who were connected to other people who were easy to influence.  Although that is a long and confusing statement I think it is very much true in the startup world I have experienced.  A lot of time and resources can be wasted trying to reach and target so called experts or highly influential people (say someone with 50,000 twitter followers or 5,000 fans on Facebook), when a better strategy would be to target local, connected individuals (say someone with 2,000 followers and 500 friends on Facebook) whom have a loyal network of followers with similar interests who are open to new ideas.

A major strength of the book is the depth of research provided, not just in facts and figures but the references at the end of each chapter.  As a reader if one particular idea or theme triggers something and you want more information then the references provide ample means for further context and exploratory research.  Another strength of the book is the timeliness of the examples.  Obviously having been published under a year ago the content is expected to be current but I find this to be very important when trying to understand something like social media and online marketing that change at a dynamic pace.  Take for example Groundswell, it was published in 2008 and already has an updated version that includes a chapter about Twitter that was published in May 2011.  This shows that in order for the ideas to be received and contextualized by the reader the content has to be timely.  These two factors, combined with the “Quick Tips” included throughout the book, make Grouped successful in conveying the application of our offline behavior to the online activity in today’s digital world.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The NHLPA is using Twitter as a means to win the PR battle of the NHL lockout

Like many other hockey fans I am disappointed that as of today’s date, October 29th, there have been no NHL games played this season due to the lockout.  This unfortunately reminds me of the 2004-05 season that was wiped out for the same reason.  Although there are similarities between this lockout and the previous one, there is at least one big difference in the way the owners and players are waging the PR battle – Twitter.  8 years ago Twitter wasn’t even invented yet today it appears to be an distinct advantage for the players to sway public opinion in their favour.

As referenced by Mirtle in his Globe and Mail article, http://goo.gl/6YqiU the young stars of the NHL are front and centre in the NHLPA’s public statements and discussions.  Contrast this to the last lockout where veterans like Trevor Linden, Chris Chelios, and Brendan Shanahan were the face of the player negotiations.  Along with youth comes new technology and this is evidenced by the player’s actions on twitter.

The “found a place to skate” initiative involves locked out NHL players surprising minor hockey league teams at practice across North America.  This allows the players to give back to the communities (something they love to do regardless of being locked out or not) but through twitter they are able to add a hashtag to it #foundaplacetoskate and attach video/photos to connect with their followers who just happen to be hockey fans.

Another way that Twitter has helped the players is through a show of solidarity.  The hashtag #theplayers has been used prominently whenever any player tweets about his opinion or frustrations regarding the lockout. Henrik Lundqvist shows an example:

Are these tactics making a meaningful difference?  I’d say it’s too early and probably too difficult to tell, but you have to think that it definitely isn’t hurting their cause amongst the substantial/growing number of hockey fans on Twitter.

And finally, as Eric Staal shows here, sometimes it IS about the name on the back of the jersey – #theplayers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hello world!

Welcome to UBC Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment