RE: collaboration and discussion within the wiki space
Reflecting on my participation:
I initated this wiki activity at the beginning of the week.
- First, I a added a “sighting”.
- Then, I thought that it might be useful to add a structure in the “discussion” area of the wiki, to ensure some type of organization to the conversations.
- As time passed, and few entries were appearing, I thought that perhaps there was a need for clear objectives. So I added an area where 5 challenges and 5 strategies would be selected by the class.
- After reading some of the comments, I decided to activate this area by adding a suggestion and finding a way to elicit participation.
- I therefore added a suggestion in the strategies section, my name and asked people who agreed to also write their names. I replicated this model to the challenges section.
General impressions:
- The wiki discussion area is very different from an LMS standard threaded discussion space.
- For one, HTML is necessary in order to organize the writing. Without it, comments soon become a big soup of ideas.
- I found that some of the students followed the bullet structure that was initiated, but some did not.
- Advantages in using wikis for group collaboration?
- It’s a change and it certainly triggers interest.
- It is useful to know how wikipedia works.
- HTML is also important to review once in while. I found most of my questions on the web (lists; bold; italics; etc.)
- Challenges of working with others in a collaborative wiki space?
- Too many comments in one place.
- Hard to distinguish between one author and another.
- Challenging to keep some kind of order in the discussion.
- Challenging to “discuss” and come to a decision when too many people are involved.
- Hence, my quest for an operational structure.
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment