My experience with mind mapping
Hi Group 5:
I enjoyed your presentation on mind mapping software. I’ve always thought of concept maps as learning tools but you’ve used it quite effectively as a teaching tool.
As a science teacher, I would rate concept mapping as one of my top educational tools to engage students in deeper thinking and metacognition. I’ve used it in three basic ways;
1. As an advanced organizer to elicit and activate students prior knowledge. This is usually done in collaborative group situations before pulling all ideas together into a whole class mind-map. This is an excellent form of formative assessment as it allows the teacher to see any learning gaps and misconceptions.
2. As a note-taking tool be students as they work through a problem-based or project-based learning situation. The mind map provides them the structure and focus necessary to keep research on topic while floating through the massive amounts of information available on the internet. It also forces them to organize the information in such a way that it becomes easier to produce and well-organized product such as a video, poster, Powerpoint presentation, etc. A quick review by the teacher allows assessment of where the students are at and where they may need to go.
3. As a review device in content-heavy units. Taking notes and other resources obtained through a unit, allows the student to resynthesize the information to represent what is in their own mind. Through self-analysis, the student can determine the areas where they are weak (heavy reliance on resources) and strong (create mind-map from memory). In reviewing these in a whole-class setting, the teacher can strengthen any weak areas consistent across the class.
In all of these cases in the last few years, I have been moving from paper based mind maps to computer generated maps (IHMC Cmap and VUE). This has allowed easier sharing and modification. It also allows me to project the maps on my interactive whiteboard and manipulate changes through whole-class discussion. One feature that I have not found in any software to date is the ability to combine and analyze differences in maps generated by different groups in the class. This would be a handy tool to generate further metacognitive activity in the students.
I have not begun using the collaborative mind mapping software such as Cacoo. I can certainly see advantages to using this as it allows anytime/anywhere access and multiple students can work on the same map at the same time. From an educational perspective, I see concept mapping tools and software as an excellent venture proposition but, due to market saturation of currently available tools, a new venture would need to be able to do something significantly different or better to be a viable venture.
Tim
Posted in: Week 09: Visual-Intensive Learning
Sherman Lee 11:09 pm on July 4, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Tim,
Thank you for sharing your experience with mind mapping with us! As you have said, mind mapping is a great tool to pull ideas together and organize thoughts. It might be a bit weird of an analogy but it reminds me somewhat of the pensieve in Harry Potter (the instrument used to review memory) as it does have the advantage of letting you see your past thoughts at a glance and hence make easier connections that way.
It is interesting that you mentioned a map comparison function for computer generated maps. How do you envision this would look like? I am interested because when I read that comment, I was trying to imagine a way of doing it. The only way I could think of that would work is that the mind map would have rigid structure to allow for easy comparison that the computer would recognize. The different versions must share some commonalities, such as wording, for the computer to be able to sort the nodes and compare them effectively. Am I understanding what you proposed correctly? This could possibly be the next venture in mind mapping 🙂
Sherman
troos 3:27 pm on July 7, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Sherman:
Yes, the versions would need some commonality but not necessarily as rigid as you imply. I think two ways that this could be done would be to use tags consisting of related words; possibly smart-tag suggestions from a database in the program as the mind map is being created. Another way would be to simply compare the maps to a database containing synonyms and other related words to see if similar connections are being made. With a growing ability in computer analytics, I should think this to be possible.
Tim
janetb 9:22 am on July 6, 2012 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Hi Tim,
I have used mind maps/webs in very similar manners to those you described. I appreciated your distinction between using them for learning and for teaching. I think this is the first time I have seen them used as instructional tools, rather than as formative assessment tools. I hadn’t formally made that connection until you mentioned it. Thanks!
Janet