This is a reflection blog to Pamela. S, which is the following link below:
According to Pamela, the clothing companies should have more larger sizes to increase sales and cater to more potential consumers. For some fashion brands who do not have sizes bigger than 10 made people feel discriminated and disrespectful. I tend to agree with her at this point. However, I think this specific marketing strategy is more than catering people. It is the perception of the public that brought up the conflict.
For example, when an American fashion brand plans to enter the Asian market, introducing more small sizes would be an important strategy as Asian girls tend to be more petite than North American girls. However, people would not usually say it is a discrimination if they do not have smaller sizes. The reason behind this is that the global trend of a beautiful and healthy body shape is slimmer and thinner. Consumers who are petite do not feel themselves inferior in the first place.
To the perspective of the clothing companies, instead of just producing the same clothes from size 0 to 20 blindly, they have to think more about the psychological needs from different groups of consumers. Of course, they have to take consumers’ feeling into consideration and show their respect. However, solely embracing larger size cannot be the panacea. I suggest that clothing companies should have two lines of design, one for petite figure girls and one for plump figure girls. Each design should make all their efforts to express the beauty of each type of figure. This would be a better way to increase the confidence of girls who wear larger sizes and develop a new trend if possible.
Image source: Editorial.designtaxi.com