While VANOC (Vancouver Olympic Committe) estimated its tier one sponsor to contribute only $20 million, Bell blew that figure out of the park as its bid totaled $200 million – ten times the initial value (credits for info: Conflicting Interests by Paul Cubbon). The major question is whether Bell got the most out of that investment. During the Olympics, not only was Bell able to expand its market into Western Canada, but it receive recognition around the world! It was finally able to expand its communication infrastructure in Vancouver and Whistler when it initially had very small operations in British Columbia. One could say, “Why did Bell bid so high?” or “Why did Bell put all its egg in one ba
sket?” From my analysis, I gathered that the Olympics was a key marketing aspect for Bell for 8 years. Although the Olympics is happening only in the course of two weeks, Bell had since 2004 to start marketing with the Olympics image. Furthermore, Bell advertised its services through the Olympics in which Bell could garner a high quality reputation because its ability to support the complex event. Last but not least, the financial statements prove the Olympics to be a good investment. They had a jump in 61% jump in quarterly profit right after the Olympics compare to the year-before quarter (read more here). Talk about a successful marketing strategy.
Read more about Bell’s sponsorship at:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/bell-beats-out-telus-to-sponsor-bcs-2010-olympics/article953570/