Final Project Reflection

For our report, we analyzed the historical and the current distribution of rivers within the City of Vancouver. We applied the ArcGIS as our main methodology to conduct the study on the local basin. The functions we used for the map-making is included but not limit to intersect, query(reclassify), project, clip, buffer etc. In order to addressed the issues of “disappear” streams in Vancouver, we compare the distribution of previous streams from 1880 to 1920 with the existing (daylighting) streams today. The report is emphasized on zoning practice and road network and their impact on the urban basin. We found that large portion of the original landmass has zoned into residential usage, especially the prevailing single housing development in the last century. River and streams thus receded from the ground, the surviving streams are mostly running through underground culverts, the few streams are remaining in the daylight also receiving significant pressure due to the complicated land uses of their surroundings. Later, the case study focus at Salish Creek demonstrate the above findings comprehensively. Further research is required to examine the feasibility of rehabilitation on the old streams.

During the map-making, each of the team members all attend to computer labs regularly and we spent extra time after class to make sure we finished the maps in advance in order to have more time to composite the report analysis. Instead of making the task separately, we had done in collaboration which is actual more efficient way because it avoids inconsistence in the map design and misunderstood from each other’s. For the written report, we divided the task for each individual group members. One of the teammate (Qingyang) has studies the Salish Stream in the Pacific Spirit Park and we were all agreed that is a good idea to including a specific case study which help readers to forge a better understand by get into specific example.

We also encounter some difficulties and uncertainties during the research stage. It is quite hard to find digitalized data for the old streams in Vancouver since we were looking at the historical data from late 19th century to early 20th century before the population booming in the city. On another hand, there aren’t much running streams in Vancouver today, so information on the current streams distributions is very scarce either. In addition, the old stream layer does not provide the current conditions of the previous streams. We only not they are buried underground but some might transformed into sewage conduits others might completed filled up. These information are important for examine the feasibility of the restoration on the old streams as I noted in the further study section.

Overall, the course final project is a great opportunity to apply various skillsets that we had learned from class. Throughout the class I became familiar with the handling ArcGIS which is an essential tool for spatial analysis in different careers. The competence of using and understood the software functioning will serve as an important building block to my academic experiences in pursuing of geography and planning realm.

 

Appendix:

Map 3: The road network in City of Vancouver and its interference with current streams and old streams.
Map 4—Case Study: Salish Stream, current watercourse is buffered

Project Copy:

Vancouver Lost Stream Restoration Assessment

Housing Affordability: Vancouver vs. London, Ontario

 

The affordability measuring refers to the amount of goods and service that an individual can be afford to buy. According to the Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey (2017), the housing affordability measures the annual household income ratio to the housing prices at a certain place. When compare the housing market in two or multiple areas, is better to look at the housing affordability multipliers than merely the housing prices. Reason for that is the latter only indicate the properties’ worth regardless the role of income which determine the feasibility of people to purchase the house. Including the household income normalize the statistics and they become more meaningful when compare the housing affordability in places. The survey has rated the affordability in four categories through the method “Median Multiples” which is based on the ratio of median household income and median house price.

 

Housing Affordability Rate Median Multiple
Affordable 3.0 & under
Moderately Unaffordable 3.1 ~ 4.0
Seriously Unaffordable 4.1 ~ 5.0
Severely Unaffordable 5.1 & over

 

Affordability is considering one of the most important indicator of a city livability. The above graph about the housing affordability between London and Vancouver, it clearly reveals the Vancouver housing market is in a very critical situation that most resident can’t afford to buy a property in contrast to a mid-size city such as London, Ontario. In terms of weather or climate, Vancouver have very comfortable living environment due to its mild winters and cool summer when you compare with the harsh winter and heavy snowfall in Southern Ontario. However, London has relative higher income and much cheaper housing than Vancouver. Despite the weather, people maybe more willing to move or staying in London; meanwhile, Vancouver unaffordable housing hold back the new residents and more people planning or already moved out from the city. The government authorities should carefully manage the urban housing market under control in order to make the city thrive in the long-term development.

 

References:

  • Canada, Government of Canada Statistics. “Median total income, by family type, by census metropolitan area (All census families).” Statistics Canada, 14 July 2016. Web. 26 Feb. 2017.
  • Hartwich, Oliver. 13th Annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey: 2017. N.p.: Demographia , 2017. PDF.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet