
Insurance companies were pushed into a tight spot where they stood between two choices: being ethical or being business sane.
In order to go about the new policy and decrease the profits loss that might be caused by the policy, these insurance companies decided to transfer the burden into part of their customers. As the new policy established by the government only cover the social concerns but not the other side of the organizational concerns, this is considered a “wise business move”. So, does ethics in business mean that companies should do everything they can to fulfill their social responsibility, even that it means the companies will suffer from financial aspect? And so it seems, even though they might want to maintain a high ethical level, it is business after all.
One more important message delivered in the case is that the federal interference in business might not be the best solution at times. Even though the concern of individuals’ healthcare was high appreciated, the government did not take the protests and issues raised by the new policy toward the insurance companies into account. This demonstrated the poor communication between the federal and monetary systems.
http://www.usavanguard.com/opinion/business-ethics-meets-business-sense-1.1649305