This week I was fortunate in that I was exposed to a lot of content regarding CAP stream Law & Society. The first was the CAP seminar that was held, where a variety of professors that lecture in this stream got together to give us a presentation on how each of the courses in this stream are interconnected, and how these connections benefit in our understanding of Law & Society. I was also able to attend “Town Hall on Quebec’s Charter of Values,” thanks to being notified of it’s existence in my Political Science class. I was enjoying the public lecture by Stephane Dion when I realized how well this ties into what we have been reading and learning in ASTU 100.
The Quebec Charter of Values is an extremely controversial issue currently in circulation amongst Canadians from coast to coast. Here are some of the more interesting points in the Charter that relate directly to the issues of Human Rights we are covering in ASTU 100.
One idea set forth in the Quebec Charter of Values is “using context to limit freedoms in a different context” as Dion puts it. This relates to the article we have read by Louis Menand, “The Rise and Fall of the Voting Rights Act,” which explores the authority given to enforce the law, not necessarily for the “intent”, but for the “effect”. The intent of some of the ideas in the Charter is to make the face of government “neutral” but the effect will be limited to religious freedoms that most Canadians would deem unjust, and the consequences of not abiding by these terms would be the inability to hold employment in the public sector. In a diverse and multicultural country such as Canada, the policies of religious freedom should be accepted and encouraged, or at the very least, tolerated. As Dion said, “tolerance isn’t about the things you like it’s about the things you don’t.” This can be seen in Quebec as the government’s inability to tolerate the religious freedoms of its people. Just as the Shelby V. Holder Act is taking away voting rights from American citizens, the Quebec Charter of Values is undermining the rights of Canadian citizens to express themselves freely without fear of discrimination. This dramatic deterioration seen in both cases is a devastating blow to basic human rights that we as two nations have worked so hard to achieve.
The taking away of what we have determined to be allowed in our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the reversal of an historic act of equalization in the United States shows how tentative laws are, and how laws can change and discriminate against specific groups of people very quickly. Hopefully, with enough support, both of these discriminatory laws can be reversed, and even more so, hopefully the people of both countries can find forgiveness.