source: http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/cms/binary/9284863.jpg?size=620x400s

In the CBC News article, “Skeena River First Nations Oppose Petronas LNG Plant Near Prince Rupert“, the First Nations argue that their fishing will be greatly affected by the new plant on Lelu Island proposed to be built by Petronas LNG. I am unable to take a side in regards to this conflict, as both parties have valid arguments supporting either the construction of the facility or lack there of.

On one hand, not only do the First Nations people obtain much of their food from the salmon that would be affected by the construction, much of their wealth would be affected as well, as the buying and selling of animal-based goods is significant in their culture (CBC). I think many of the small businesses in that region would be greatly affected by the construction of the factory, which would have a negative impact on the economy in that region.

Despite this, the construction of the plant would likely have a positive impact on our national economy. In addition, the land being considered is distant from the land inhabited by the First Nations in opposition of the project. I think this emphasizes the blurred lines in terms of what rights they have with regard to the land in British-Columbia and how much power they have a right to in land development projects.

The results of this conflict will definitely have a large impact on the economies of different regions, but who would pay the greater price?

Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/skeena-river-first-nations-oppose-petronas-lng-plant-near-prince-rupert-1.2824967