Final Blog Post!!

My cousin was in the military, he is quite a bit older than me and did three tours in Iraq. Me and my cousin have never really been close. Movies and books about war have never been an interest of mine, I normally try to avoid them actually. The genre of American war hero has always been too obviously hyper-masculine and focused on the American perspective for me to be able to watch them and enjoy it without being obnoxiously critical. Since I never actually taken a deep look into what a soldiers life is like in and after war, most of what I assumes soldiers lives were like were based off of things I’d gathered from memorial sites and history lessons. Things that I’d seen on the news or passed over on social media.

On fourth of July when I would see the casusionary advertisements that talked about being quiet for the sake of scaring dogs and war veterans I was not very understanding as to why veterans were mentioned along with dogs. I could understand dogs, I had seen my own get upset on new years and the Fourth of July from the noise of the fireworks. I had a misunderstanding about the veterans. I still have a misunderstanding about them, but what I was thinking was that since they were home and not in a war environment the sounds of explosions shouldn’t bother them. They were not in the war and so they weren’t in a war mindset anymore, or at least that’s what I was assuming.

After reading Patrick Deer’s “Mapping Contemporary American War culture” and then watching American Sniper and Phil Klay’s “Redeployment” I realized that I have really no understanding of what life for a soldier is like, especially once they’re back home. I had only really looked at the “strong war man with a big gun” narrative, where they “go and get the bad guys” and from being so focused on critiquing this one narrative of this one aspect of war I in a way blinded myself from understand other parts of the war veteran. In all three of the pieces above my attention is directed toward apart of the war hero that is not shown in high school history lessons or memorial sites. Reading both of the pieces of writing and watching the movie, all things that I probably would not have done on my own, changed how I understood my cousins homecoming and helped me gain a new perspective in understanding the ways in which his life is functioning now.

Howdy friends,

For the last little bit in ASTU we have been exploring poetry and the politics surrounding it. Poetry is something that I have priorities in my life and am very enthusiastic about (if you couldn’t tell by the “whoohooo”). I am actually currently in the (very long) process of putting together a composition of my own poetry. In University (especially UBC) I think that poetry is very underestimated in its complexities structure and importance in history. This isn’t one particular persons or faculties fault, but it seems like unless you are studying creative writing poetry and all of the amazing things that it can do gets forgotten. I also understand that poetry just like performance art or calculous, is just not some peoples cup O’tea.

I would like to take this little moment of time to remind everyone that even though we (university students and faculty) seem to spend day in and day out reading very complex and groundbreaking (but sometimes dry) writings by big historical and academic names, poetry also has the ability to be very intercute, revolutionary and influential.  

Often when I hear my fellow students talking about poetry there two main themes that I gather, one being that they generally don’t like it or understand what’s it’s saying and two that they feel it amounts to the overall importance in life that the other readings in our curriculum do. I too occasionally catch myself prioritising other styles of assigned literature over the assigned poetry. Some of this frustration or resentment towards poetry i believe comes from how as students we are taught to process literature. It has become an absolute necessity for success in a university to be able to not only to be able to make it to the end of a complex study or argumentative work, but to also be able to break down its pieces and see how one thing leads to the next and what it means in terms of the real world. We have been seasoned and prepped for understanding this academic style of writing our whole life. Mostly this comes from our societies prioritization of S.T.E.M, governmental and corporate related occupations and the idea that choosing to create and produce art as a career generally does not lead to a financially stable life (i.e. the starving artist).The the idea that the production of art is a serious and societally important career has only recently started to become accepted, and even more recently the importance of incorporating art into the education system has come about.

Based off of the way that our education systems function and how our culture views artists, when we think of pieces of writing that have shaped the functionality of humanity we think of things like government documents and scientific findings. Instead of Shakespeare’s Hamlet  or Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey. The themes from these three pieces of poetry and the contributions from these two poets alone are so embedded in our culture that often people do not even recognize them when they are present. One example of their influences would be that Shakespeare on his own added over 1700 words to the english language, words so common as bedroom, lonely, eyeball, elbow and lower that when people learn these words came from poems they are in disbelief. A fun game is trying to think of the different consumer products that are named after things in Homer’s epic poetry, for starters we have Amazon and the honda Odyssey.

Along with poetries contributions to the shaping of humanity another thing that is overlooked is its level of complexes structuring and the intellectual engagement it requires to fully comprehend. I don’t know about you, but without in depth lecturing and full class discussions the Odyssey was a very confusing and antagonising read.

In university when we think of what poetry is I believe most of us think about lyrical poetry. This makes sense since it has been very popular over the last century. The issue with only thinking about lyrical poetry is that it’s very easy to read and not realize all of the rules and layering that goes into it. For example when reading Florence Cassen Mayers All-American Sestina one could initially gather that it’s just a bunch of counting and naming of typical american things:

One nation, indivisible

two-car garage

three strikes you’re out

four-minute mile

five-cent cigar

six-string guitar

 

six-pack Bud

one-day sale

five-year warranty

two-way street

fourscore and seven years ago

three cheers

 

three-star restaurant

sixty-

four-dollar question

one-night stand

two-pound lobster

five-star general

 

five-course meal

three sheets to the wind

two bits

six-shooter

one-armed bandit

Four-poster

 

four-wheel drive

five-and-dime

hole in one

three-alarm fire

sweet sixteen

Two-wheeler

 

two-tone Chevy

four rms, hi flr, w/vu

six-footer

high five

three-ring circus

one-room schoolhouse

 

two thumbs up, five-karat diamond

Fourth of July, three-piece suit

six feet under, one-horse town

When really the form of the piece, sestina, is very complex. It always has 39 lines and follows a strict syllabic structure and repetitive pattern. Before being able to decode a poem one also has to learn the language that explains it and the ability to read poetic patterns, in a way understanding these two things is similar to understanding how to read music. Poets.org explains the formula for the sestina writing,

“repetition of the initial six end-words of the first stanza through the remaining five six-line stanzas, culminating in a three-line envoi[…] the envoi must also include the remaining three end-words, BDF, in the course of the three lines so that all six recurring words appear in the final three lines.”   

The formaic outline is blow:

  1. ABCDEF
  2. FAEBDC
  3. CFDABE
  4. ECBFAD
  5. DEACFB
  6. BDFECA
  7. (envoi) ECA or ACE

Even more complex than the Sestina are the works of idiosyncratic poets like E.E Cumming who’s writing broke new ground and showed the world that the spacing and selection of words in writing holds incredible power over its audience. This can also be seen (in a bit different way) in Julián Felipe Herrera’s You throw a stone where the lay out of the words forces the reader to internalize the poem in a similar motion as the actions taking place in the work.  Below are two of my favorite E. E. Cummings poems, the first one I WILL BE is an example of how the spacing of the letters influences how the reader experiences the poem. Every time is one reading this they are analyzing chaos, hopping, dividing and deeply focusing on what the words are trying to say literally and spaciously. The second piece, 9, uses words in an interruptive style to represent underlying meaning. What words are read and what ones are not is part of the function of the work showing the power of choice that the poem contains, forcing its readers to make decisions and eliminations before they are able to get the full meaning of the work.

i will be
M o ving in the Street of her

bodyfee 1 inga ro undMe the traffic of
lovely;muscles-sinke x p i r i n    g S
uddeni
Y         totouch
the curvedship of
Her-
….kiss      her:hands
will play on,mE as
dea d tunes OR s-crap p-y lea Ves flut te rin g
from Hideous trees or

Maybe Mandolins
1 oo k-
pigeons fly ingand

whee(:are,SpRiN,k,LiNg an in-stant with sunLight
then)!-
ing all go BlacK wh-eel-ing

oh
ver
mYveRylitTle

street
where
you will come,

at twi li ght
s(oon & there’s
a             m oo
)n.

9.

there are so many tictoc
clocks everywhere telling people
what toctic time it is for
tictic instance five toc minutes toc
past six tic

Spring is not regulated and does
not get out of order nor do
its hands a little jerking move
over numbers slowly

we do not
wind it up it has no weights
springs wheels inside of
its slender self no indeed dear
nothing of the kind.

(So,when kiss Spring comes
we’ll kiss each kiss other on kiss the kiss
lips because tic clocks toc don’t make
a toctic difference
to kisskiss you and to
kiss me)

All four of the poems I’ve mentioned above are fairly easy to skim over and kind of guess or assume what they are trying to tell you. I fear that due to the fast pace of university and the high focus on academic and scholarly writing students, like myself, are forgetting about all the incredible ways that poetry works with its readers. For myself this is very upsetting to realize how long it’s been since i sat down and really decoded something other than an assigned piece of work. Even though the poetry that we have been looking at in our ASTU class was assigned it has been a very important wake up call. Sitting down and analyzing poetry over the last week or so has made me recognize in myself and others how little we think about poetry and all that it does.

Amazonia Exhibit

The Kayapo are a South American indigenous tribe with 50 villages and more than 8,000 members. When western settlers came to South America the Kayapo resisted assimilation with brutal violence and retreating further into the rainforest. Since then they have become known for being very aggressive, many of the articles I have read talk about how they would kill off their neighbors and anyone else they found near or on their land. This violence was their way of trying to reserve their home. The area in which the Kayapo live is over 11,000,000 hectors, which is twice the size of Nova Scotia. The Kayapo are very skilled hunters that use blowguns and they relied on their land for providing all of their resources, up until very recently. It wasn’t until the 1950’s that the Kayapo tribe had any contact with the modern world. The Amazonia exhibit talks about this a little bit saying, “It wasn’t until the 1950’s and 60’s however (that) their isolation was broken by the Brazilian government, whose policies advocated for active integration of indigenous groups.” The exhibit mostly focuses is the on Kayapo protest in 1989 that went global.

In 1989 the Kayapo were defending their political rights and protesting the Kararao dam that was supposed to be built on their traditional land by the Brazilian Government. The Kararao would not only flood and displace the whole kayapo tribe, but it would also destroy thousands of square miles of untouched rainforest and disrupt fish and animal migration patterns. The Kayapo gained so much support globally that the world bank decided they could no longer fund the Brazilian Governments project, and the Kararao damn was never built. That was in 1989 though and the Amazonia exhibit does not mention any of the progress that has happened since then.

20 years later in 2008 the Kayapo again faced off with the Brazilian government’s plan to build the Belo Monte dam, which is going to be the third largest dam in the world. Through many legal disputes, indigenous protests, and human and environmental rights campaigns the Belo Monte dam construction broke ground in 2011. The dam’s first turbines started spinning in 2016 and the whole project is expected to be finished in 2019. The International Rivers organization in their Belo Monte facts sheet explains that the dam displaces over 20,000 indigenous people and famers, the amount of earth that is needed to be moved to build the dam is lager than the amount for the Panama Canal, and more than 1,500 square kilometers of land will be destroyed. The dam has been called one of the worst environmental crimes in the history of the planet.

When reading about the Belo Monte dam I can’t help but make connections between this and the (obviously much smaller, but close to home) Dakota access pipeline and Standing Rock protest. Both the pipeline and the dam destroy some of the last traditionally indigenous people’s land in the world. Both of these projects justify destroying the land by promising that they will be more efficient. Due to the 3-4 month dry season in Brazil the Belo Monte dam is actually expected to be very inefficient. The Dakota access pipeline that was supposed to be one of the most efficient pipelines ever made leaked 210,000 gallons of crude oil with in the first year of being built.

When I read about all the barriers and fines that these governments have to deal with to get these projects in motion I become so frustrated. These fines and barriers happen for reasons, reasons being that they are irreversibly intruding on human rights and environmental rights. Once the amazon is gone, it’s gone and will never truly come back. Once indigenous peoples land has been taken away and destroyed by deforestation, pipelines, and construction you can’t give it back. It feels like a downward spiral that at every turn has more unanticipated negative outcomes. I believe though that the biggest problem of this all is that the global community does not emphasis the importance of the land until there is a dam, pipeline or some major project that is going to destroy it. It isn’t until a project has been proposed that people begin to get involved. If the world had a better history of respecting others land, the thought of intruding on indigenous lands would not even be a thought in large oil and energy companies minds.

 

Sources

“Belo Monte Dam.” International Rivers, International Rivers, www.internationalrivers.org/campaigns/belo-monte-dam.

Link to International Rivers Belo Monte Dam facts sheet: https://www.internationalrivers.org/sites/default/files/attached-files/Belo_Monte_FactSheet_May2012.pdf

Cuevas, Mayra, and Steve Almasy. “Keystone Pipeline leaks 210,000 gallons of oil in South Dakota.” CNN, Cable News Network, 17 Nov. 2017, www.cnn.com/2017/11/16/us/keystone-pipeline-leak/index.html.

Parry , Bruce. “Bruce Parry’s Amazon – About The Journey – The Kayapo.” BBC, BBC, 18 June 2014, www.bbc.co.uk/amazon/sites/kayapo/pages/content.shtml.

Watts, Jonathan. “Belo Monte dam operations delayed by Brazil court ruling on indigenous people.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 15 Jan. 2016, www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/15/brazil-belos-monte-dam-delay-court-indigenous-people.

Zimmerman, Barbara . “Kayapo.” Kayapo.org, kayapo.org/about-the-kayapo-3.html.

11/9/17

I remember when I was 7th grade and the Justin Bieber movie came out, my friends and I all made matching shirts that we wore to the premiere of the movie and probably didn’t stop talking about the movie for weeks. As I grew and became more politically aware and I can remember my mother and aunts talking about sending emails and leaving voicemails for  government actors. A lot of the time now, even on the news, when you see a person directly contacting a political figure it is through something like a tweet or post on Facebook. Now if I have something to say to any sort of public figure or celebrity I can send them something directly, either through social media or email. There is no formal structure or really rules about how I have to go about contacting these people and how I have to word myself.

When visiting the RBSC (rare books and special collection) library on the 31st of October I had the privilege to read some of the fan mail written to Canadian poet and author Joy Kogawa. All of the letters were very personal and thought out. Some included questions or were seeking advice and others just wanted to voice how they had connect and been affected by Kogawa’s work. When reading these letters it almost felt like there was a montage flipping through my head of all the ridiculous and inappropriate things I have seen tweeted at celebrates, artists, and political figures. I realized the only times I can recall  sending an actual paper letter to someone was for invitations, thank you cards, and letters home from camp. The fan mail to Kogawa was very personal and well constructed, and this makes sense. Anytime I’ve ever had to send a handwritten letter, even if it was just a holiday greeting card I have really thought about what I was going to say. I can very confidently say I have not put the same amount thought into most of the things I put on social media as I do for letter writing.

I took a larger step back and began to think about the RBSC as a whole. In the future when building fonds will they have to account for the emails and comments sent to public figures via social media? How will the rapid change in communication and the ability to contact almost anyone in the world change how we record people’s history and their effects on their audience? Will what we have in the RBSC soon just become an archive on wikipedia or something you can access via google? All of this takes me to thinking about Marita Sturken book Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the Politics of Remembering. In the introduction of her book Sturken talks about how cultural memories shape and affect our historical memories of things. Soon it seems handwritten fan mail will be replaced by electronic messages. Without having these letters that people had to sit down and really think about what they were going to say, I worry our memories of how certain authors like Joy Kogawa, and other figures in the media will be skewed by the fact that there’ll only be tweets and emails to look back on.

 

sources:

Sturken, Marita. Tangled memories: the Vietnam War, the AIDS epidemic, and the politics of remembering. Univ. of California Press, 2009.

Blog Entry One: Unceded Land

Before coming to UBC I had never heard the word ‘unceded’. After having it explained to me at most school gatherings and in almost every class the word really began to sink into my thoughts. It wasn’t only the frequency that that I was hearing the word but also where I was hearing it; on school grounds, in the classrooms, and in surveys provided by the school asking if we understood the history of this land and that it’s Musqueam territory. I was born and raised in Portland, Oregon, which on a good day is only 6.5 hour drive South of Vancouver, and Portland just like Vancouver is on unseated land. It is a known but never really talked about fact that there were First Nations people living in the Willamette Valley before the settlers came. Seeing as that I have spent basically my whole life living in the Willamette Valley and had never heard the word ‘unceded’ before it is very easy to assume that the history of Portland’s land isn’t widely understood either. These thoughts only came to me though after extensively discussing Vancouver’s history. As stated earlier it wasn’t just the that we were talking about it unceded land, it was where we were talking about it that made me realize that in the first three weeks I’ve spent at UBC I’ve learned more about Vancouvers history than I have about Portland’s in my whole 19 years combined. I know almost nothing about what Oregon was before Lewis and Clark came and about who was there before the Oregon trail brought an endless flood of settlers West.

Following this stream of thought I came to think about what I did know and the education I had been given about Oregon. I remember being in elementary school and the big treat was that at the end of 5th grade your whole class got to go to the Oregon Trail, which we had studied all year, and stay in a canvas wagon. In middle school I learned all about Lewis and Clark and took a field trip to Fort Clatsop where they had stayed. In high school I spent years studying the colonies and the Revolutionary and Civil War. I remember studying the definitions of words like “manifest destiny”. I can tell you all about how the pioneers crossed the great plains and passed the Rocky mountains to get to Portland. I know all of the funny stories too, like how Oregon’s birthday is on Valentine’s Day and when people were first settling Portland there were so many tree stumps that it was nicknamed Stump Town. I could go in circles talking about what the settlers “found” and built, but no matter how long and hard I search my mind I cannot tell you what or who was there before Stump Town and Lewis and Clark. It is almost like I have never thought to questioned if there even was anything going on before the white settlers came. If I had never been taught anything about the First Nations people living in Oregon and instead solely taught the history of the European settler that came after it is almost like I was lead to think there was nothing before the settlers.

From here I am reminded of a discussion that took place in the the beginning of my ASTU classes about how literature correlates with how we think of history and can shape our memories and ideas of it. My whole life I have studied textbooks that make it seem as if America’s history started when the pilgrims set foot on the East coast. Maybe if I had not grown up with Dee Brown’s, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee on my mothers bookshelf and a neighbor with Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce tribe’s quote, “The earth is the mother of all people, and all people should have equal rights upon it” as a bumper sticker, I would have never had a second thought or reasons to not believe these textbooks.

An article written by Casey Parks and published in The Oregonian talks about the lacking history of minorities in Portland Public school’s textbooks and calls attention to the fact that in 2015 about half of Portland’s students identify as “non-white”. In the article Parks quotes Portland Publics Schools student Y Le who voices, “It’s weird that our textbooks don’t reflect the diversity we see in our world (…) The type of people that I always see in my house and at school, they should be reflected in our textbooks.”  Le is apart of a campaign called the Missing Pages of Our Textbook and is working towards creating a social studies class that focuses on the history of African Americans, Asians, Latinos, and Native Americans and will be offered in Portland Public Schools. She point out that,”There’s a history of people who have achieved things that are not white males, but we don’t see that.” By not teaching children about the First Nations people and their achievements Portland Public Schools is leaving it up to the students to fill these gaps in their educations. By not showing students that there was civilization before the white settlers came these textbooks are backhandedly telling students that the settlers built this land and survived all on their own. By saying nothing about the First Nations people of the Willamette Valley Portland Public Schools is essentially teaching students that they did not exist, while at the same time leaving students to assume that the history of Portland started when the white settlers moved West.   

 

Sources

Chief Joseph, or, Hinmatóowyalahtq̓it . “Chief Joseph Quotes.” BrainyQuote, Xplore, www.brainyquote.com/authors/chief_joseph. Accessed 26 Sept. 2017. “The earth is the mother of all people, and all people should have equal rights upon it.”

Parks , Casey. “Textbooks don’t tell the history of minorities, students say. Teenagers want to change that.” Oregon Live, The Oregonian , 3 Nov. 2015, www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2015/11/oregon_ethnic_studies.html. Accessed 26 Sept. 2017.