Week 5: Caudillos vs The Nation State

This week’s reading reminded me a lot about Colombian history. Caudillos were so important, that even nowadays, big parts of Bogota are named after them.  These political leaders were present where the people was not able to turn to the government or elite institutions, certainly, they were a very important feature of the colonial life. Politics influence every aspect of society; education, economy, and even religion, the caudillos played an important part of colonial life, and it definitely influenced the rural areas.

I agree with the readings when it says that it is difficult to talk about caudillos without talking about violence, territorial losses, and even economic difficulties. Caudillos are certainly one of the root causes of Latin America modern challenges. When I think about how long it took for Colombia to come up with an agreement to end up the civil war caused by the division between two political parties, liberals, and conservators, which were sort of founded by the division the caudillos had with the Urban Elites. This was the start of a sequence of events that led Colombia to struggle with insurgent groups like Las FARC, violence, and even more division. This is not only the case of Colombia.  Apart from this, I will dare to say that I like the idea of having a strong leader for a small portion of rural land. Sometimes, big central governments neglect the rural provinces, and they don’t have any way to make their needs present.

It seems to me that liberalism in Latin America was really idealistic and frustrated by a constant flaw in the political system. Maybe we are never going to be able to achieve it, but I also think it is worth trying and believing in what it proposes. I would really like to know more about the situation in Central America and Mexico,

1 thought on “Week 5: Caudillos vs The Nation State

  1. Angela

    Hey Karen, I agree on your point of why you think having caudillos represent small rural areas would be a good thing. In theory it makes a lot of sense, centralized governments can become too overwhelmed by larger issues and ignore smaller issues (which are larger issues in smaller communities). I do feel like having representatives for the rural areas is a really good idea it ensures that everyone’s voices are being heard, which is why I have a hard time seeing the caudillos in an entirely bad light even though they’re mostly spoken about in a negative context. However, you mentioned that caudillos are one of the root causes of modern Latin American problems so I’m curious of why you sympathize with them at all? I really liked reading this, thanks for your insight!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Angela Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *