October 2014

Class 10: Business Model Canvas and Macro Environment—Tsilhqot’in VS Taseko

10192767

The company in question here is Taseko, a Canadian mining company focusing on the operation and development on mines in British Columbia. Recently Taseko has been involved in a territorial conflict with a B.C. First Nation, the Tsilhqot’in. The latter unilaterally declared a newly courts-approved area as a tribal park, including the site of Taseko’s New Prosperity copper-gold project at Fish Lake, which lay outside the supposed title area.

The social-economic trend nowadays is that First Nations people are putting increasing efforts to protect their titled landscapes from being contaminated by industrial hazards. They are willing to forgo the potential economic benefits accompanied by industry developments near their homelands. In addition, based on Supreme Court of Canada ruling, corporate industries have to seek legal consent from the Tsilhqot’in before pursuing any industrial development on their traditional territory. Both social-economic trends and regulatory trends provide foresight for Taseko’s future development. Whether Tsilhqot’in people’s declaration of tribal park is legitimate or not, developing and maintaining mutually beneficial relationships with the First Nations communities should still at the top of Taseko’s agenda. Moreover, more investing in environmentally sustainable and friendly mining technologies should be pursued to show that the company, just like First Nations people, is also committed to the preservation of biodiversity.

 

Image and Website Sources:

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/metro/Unilateral+park+declared+Tsilhqot+includes+Prosperity+mine/10192766/story.html

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/metro/cms/binary/10192767.jpg?size=620x400s

 

 

Business ethics issues : Response to Vicky’s blog

I would like to expand further on Vicky’s blog post regarding artisanal gold mining in West Africa from this article.

ghana-mining-04Poverty has been a prominent issue in Africa for a long time. It is not surprising that impoverished workers would willingly work as artisanal gold miners, no matter how harsh the working conditions are, to scrounge a tiny income for the families, as they could not otherwise survive.

However, I do not agree with Vicky’s viewpoint that as long as the trade is legal and agreed by both mineworkers and mining companies, there is nothing unethical. The mining companies aim to increase profits while engaging in open competition without deception or fraud. Based on Friedman’s theory, they seem to have fulfilled their social responsibility as business corporations. However, using artisanal miners from time to time as an unofficial exploration team and hence subjecting them to dangerous and poisonous working conditions is definitely considered as an exploitation of workers and therefore unethical. While the international mining companies should not held solely responsible for miners’ welfare, they could at least invest more in mining technologies to improve the overall working conditions and efficiency for workers. Governments may also negotiate with foreign companies to ensure the welfare of ordinary citizens is not compromised extensively.

Image and Website sources:

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/opencontracting/pages/60/features/original/ghana-mining-04.jpg?1350906819

http://search.proquest.com/docview/1033811415

 

 

Pepsi and Coca-Cola’s “healthy” choices

141002092042-pepsi-coke-natural-620xa

Soft drinks are often related to obesity, diabetes and a series of health issues. As the society is getting more critical of products that are high in sugar, calories or artificial ingredients, beverage companies like Pepsi and Coke have responded to the health trend by introducing new products that are marketed as relatively healthier choices.

Pepsi True contains 30% fewer calories than its regular version while Coca-Cola Life has 40 calories less than the traditional Coke. And both new products will contain stevia, a natural sweetener extracted from plants.

Personally I think the reduced-calorie drinks may still not appeal to the very health-conscious consumers, since soda drinks are in nature still unhealthy drinks that contain far more sugar than our daily sugar needs. Therefore it is really ironic and misleading to pitch them as healthy choices. However, the marketing endeavours are effective in making consumers feel less guilty about drinking sugared soda.

From another news article, Coca-Cola also signed up for the UK government’s controversial responsibility deal to help improve public eating habits. It is obviously a win-win situation for Coca-Cola from a business perspective, as it not only demonstrated that the company is concerned with social welfare but also presented a good platform to promote the newly launched products. Nevertheless, whether public health could actually be improved from it remains a question.

 

Sources:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/pepsi-s-natural-sweetener-version-to-be-launched-on-amazon-1.2785555

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/pepsi-next-aims-to-attract-consumers-wary-of-sugar-1.2587588

Image sources:

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/money/dam/assets/141002092042-pepsi-coke-natural-620xa.jpg