“The lives of King’s characters are entangled in and informed by both the colonial legacy in the Americas and the narratives that enact and enable colonial domination. King begins to extricate his characters’ lives from the domination of the invader’s discourses by weaving their stories into both Native American oral traditions and into revisions of some of the most damaging narratives of domination and conquest: European American origin stories and national myths, canonical literary texts, and popular culture texts such as John Wayne films. These revisions are acts of narrative decolonization.” (Cox, qtd. in Paterson, question 4)
This prompt drew me as, more and more throughout my learning this year, I have been reflecting on the impact, and potential, of art and stories in the processes of colonization and decolonization (including through maps, national “myths,” and historic stories/histories). When I first read this quote and the prompt to “[i]dentify and discuss two of King’s ‘acts of narrative decolonization’” (Paterson), a flood of ideas came to mind as I thought of different aspects of Green Grass, Running Water that seemed to re-story not only prominent Western stories, but colonial perspectives and assumptions that underlie these stories, along with many others.
However, while starting to write, I began to reflect on how the concept of “decolonization” itself is diverse in its definitions and interpretations. Defining this term seemed important to being able to write and reflect on it, yet this definition was not as definite as the word might imply. In fact, some suggest that the definition in and of itself is variable, depending on the context of its use (Sium, Desai, and Ritskes ii; Tuck and Yang 5).
Beyond these points, a friend of mine told me once that she had been reflecting on the word “decolonization” in being counter to colonization, yet centered around it by the term itself. This caused our discussion to turn to what other words could be used to “paint the picture” of what is desired instead. We did not come-up with an all-inclusive answer, and, as some suggest, perhaps “Decolonization doesn’t have a synonym” (Tuck and Yang 3). However, the ideas of restorying and highlighting, what is desired was a large part of this conversation.
Still, within the overarching themes of decolonization, I agree with James Cox’s suggestion that throughout the story Green Grass, Running Water, Thomas King contributes to the process of disrupting damaging colonial narratives and prompting his audience to think critically about their assumptions (or, in other words, decolonizing) through his narrative (221). In particular, through his writing, King presents different perspectives and storylines than the hetero-patriarchal ideals that Western culture typically emphasizes (especially compared to many Indigenous relationships with gender and gender roles), shows that Indigenous stories are still being told and lived (counter to myths of “vanishing Indians”), and creates a form of storyline that is not as monologic as traditional Western stories and that highlights the interconnections, and dialogues, between story lines and perspectives (Chester 45). In addition, King inserts threads of story and creates alternate tellings of well known and “damaging” colonial narratives, such as Moby Dick and genesis (Cox 221).
To expand on a few of these themes, one of the first things that struck me in King’s writing was the prominence and power of his female characters. Women in Green Grass, Running Water, such as Alberta Frank, are strong, capable, intelligent, and “successful,” while other characters who are portrayed as women (such as the “four Indians:” Lone Ranger, Robinson Crusoe, Ishmael, and Hawkeye) are shown as powerful entities in the creation stories that are cycle throughout the book. Beyond this, instances such as some interpretations of Moby Jane (Flick 152), and even Albert’s desire for a family structure without commitment to one man (King 65), touch on possibilities of sexuality, gender, and family that go beyond common Western (hetero-patriarchal) structures. Even the four old Indians seem to transcend gender (and gender expectations) in some ways as they are perceived as men or women by different characters and at different times.
In these ways, King plays with assumptions of gender and identity commonly portrayed in Western society, such as what wedlock means in a Western sense, compared to what characters such as Alberta desire (86-87), and what a reader might initially assume when one reads “police officer” before the officer is referred to as “she” (304). These narratives bring awareness to these assumptions and can create a dialogue between these potentially different perspectives (Western and Indigenous), both within the narrative and within the audience.
Along these lines, King’s narrative not only prompts discussion and creates an alternative message to many Western stories, but it creates an alternate telling to and (re)claims some of the well known Western narratives that have impacted society, including views of women. For example, King’s telling of First Woman’s story can evoke the narrative of Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden, even for those relatively unfamiliar with the tale. However, this story is of its own making and is an entirely new perspective on the garden of Eden tale, if they can be said to be the same at all. In King’s version, First Woman (later known as the Lone Ranger) and Ahdamn (later known as Tonto) end-up in a garden made by First Woman (40). Coyote’s rambunctious dream-turned-dog-turned-backwards (GOD), while watching these events unfold, decides that the garden belongs to him and that he does not want to share with anyone (King 68-69). First Woman concludes that he seems to have forgotten his relations, and her and Ahdamn leave the garden to find another location without “a grouchy GOD for a neighbour” (King 69).
Through this narrative, King disrupts colonial stories, and their related assumptions, in a number of ways. For instance, in this version of the story, First Woman chooses to leave the garden and has authority over her own choices and body/location, suggesting a “reclamation of … authority” for Indigenous women (which many had prior to colonization) (Cox 227). In addition, through this storytelling process, King touches on the continuance and adaptability of Indigenous peoples (counter to some colonial myths) as First Woman continues to thrive and problem-solve throughout the story — moving to another place, changing her name, and continuing to “fix things” in a more modern-seeming setting as the Lone Ranger.
Overall, while this only touches the tip of the possible examples of the decolonial narratives and conversations between different paradigms that King provides in his book, King has created a powerful deconstruction and re-storying of damaging Western narratives, while also weaving in ongoing stories and connections. Some storytellers suggest that there is power and significance in creating narratives as they can create another vision for the future (and past) that can impact one’s perception of the world, or even just provide another perspective, a different story, which can be important in and of itself. In Green Grass, Running Water, by showing the interconnectedness of the stories and the lives of his characters throughout the narrative, as well as the connections between colonial and decolonial narratives, King works to create another, decolonizing narrative while inviting the story’s audience to interact with it and ultimately, reflect and inspect their own questions, connections, and assumptions.
—
Works Cited Continue reading