Anticipation of Digital Modules

Well the term is coming close to an end. We are getting ready to being our Digital Modules that will be work on in Cybergroups (CG). I am excited about this prospect as my only experience in using Moodle came in course work for ETEC 565. I feel like I have gained a lot of knowledge on design, constructivism, and connectivism since then. I look forward to working with my group and benefiting from their experiences.

We have been discussing a wide range of topics thus far in the course. A few areas that have really struck my interests are:

  • Authorship, Copyright, and Intellectual Property (You can see my Media Production Video on this topic on my October 31, 2012 posting.)
  • “Living with the Virtual”
  • and Technology, Religion, and Spirituality (which has sparked some great discussions in the Vista forums).

Techno-Prophets

I thought I would share a post that I made in my ETEC 540 course.  The readings were based on the “origin and Nature of Hypertext”.  This was a posting I shared today:

As I was reading about the “memex” discussed by Bush (1945) and the potential devices he discussed I couldn’t help thinking of today’s devices. The smartphones and tablets as perfect realizations for his prediction of personal devices for storing and working with data. I keep being blown away by the technology prophets that were so bang on with their predictions of the future. It makes me wonder if predictions by individuals like Kurzweil will actually come true.

I also loved Nelson’s (1999) discussion on the “Two Parody Views of Copyright”. He discusses the two camps, pro and anti copyright. I love his statement, ” I would gladly live in a world without copyright,”. he goes on to say that it is not likely to happen. Which I agree with both statements. I do wonder though if copyright will eventually disappear if society: continues to push for collaboration, accepts works that are ripped/mixed/and mashed, and the impact of technology that continues to provide easier ways to share information. At some point will the original copyright holder become lost in the shuffle? I can see how those with money to lose will cling to this idea…but I do like the philosophy behind the CopyLeft movement and Creative Commons. This also seems similar to the “transcopyright system” discussed by Nelson (1999).

Ken

Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101–108. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush

Nelson, T. (1999). “Xanalogical structure, needed now more than ever: Parallel documents, deep links to content, deep versioning and deep re-use.” Available:
http://www.cs.brown.edu/memex/ACM_HypertextTestbed/papers/60.html

http://creativecommons.org/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft

Am I an artist?

Well so far we have been engaging in a wide variety of topics that I know little about.  I was not familiar with the history and confrontations that have taken place between art and technology.  Looking into the definitions of Media and cultural studies and reflecting how media impacts culture has been a great experience so far.

We were asked last week to begin creating a media piece that would have us reflect on if we considered ourselves to be artists or not.  Here is my first attempt at answering this question.

ETEC 531 Vlog!