Evaluation Criteria
Users may find it most useful to download the rubric for assessing this PD workshop.
Evaluation Criteria
My evaluation is based on Beers and Wilson’s (2003) seven best practices of constructivist e-learning, as I felt it best provided a description of what an exemplary constructivist lesson should provide.
Those scoring this rubric may decide to either provide a single score for each general category, only scores for individual items within a category, or both. The rating scale is based on the new grading system currently used by South East Cornerstone School Division for grades 1 – 9. A score of “N/A” may be used if the evaluator feels they do not have sufficient information to evaluate an item.
Experiencing Difficulty |
Beginning |
Approaching |
Meeting |
Excels |
SCORE |
|
Score Values: | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|
KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION / ACTIVATING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
Learners are given opportunities to relate prior concepts to new understandings; the PD structure provides access to appropriate resources; the environment facilitates knowledge construction and is not just a medium to deliver instruction |
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
PROCESS
It is the process of the PD lesson, more than the final product, that helps the learner into reaching the multiple lesson goals (understanding quality online teaching/course design and the value of collaborative group work in an online environment). |
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES / SOCIAL LEARNING
Through collaborative social learning and access to multiple expert opinions online, the learners are provided with opportunities to compare and expand their own knowledge. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
SITUATED COGNITION
Learners are placed in an authentic, problem-based situation that provides relevance and meaning to the learners in an engaging environment |
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
REFLEXIVE COGNITION
The process encourages the learners to examine and reflect on their own understandings of how they personally learn and how they teach their own students; the actual content learned is less important than understanding the factors that aided their own learning |
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
COGNITIVE APPRENTICESHIP
The lesson models appropriate strategies that the learners may incorporate into their own teaching, while providing necessary scaffolding through social collaboration with their peers or from the PD facilitators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCESS-BASED EVALUTATION
The evaluation of the PD exercise allows focus to be placed on either the “instrumentality” (the effectiveness of the experience as it relates to promoting growth for the online teachers’ instructional practice/course design) and/or the “metacognitive skills” of the learners (their ability to reflect on their own personal learning process). Does the learner gain proficiency in the desired skills? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|