“Learning-Centered” as Opposed to “Learner-Centered”?

Anderson asserts that a theory of online learning needs to reflect what is known about effective learning environments in general, and that the attributes of learning are; learner-centred, knowledge-centred, assessment-centred and community-centred. I found Anderson’s descriptions of some of the terms somewhat limited, and I wonder if it has to do with how Anderson sees them in a post-secondary environment as oppose to a K-12 context.

Anderson uses “learner-centred” to refer to the idea that the context of the learner, specifically his or her background, and prior knowledge be understood by the teacher, and that the learning environment take this into account, more for the purpose of the teacher correcting any “misconceptions the learner starts with in their construction of new knowledge” (47), than for anything else. While I see this as necessary in the most effective learning environments, I think Anderson’s view is narrowly constructed.  Anderson’s assertion that the focus would be better termed “learning-centred” rather than learner-centred is problematic to me in that it assumes a standard learner and ignore the real diversity in learners. I have seen examples of online learning support diversity in learners more in 8-12 contexts (as opposed to most – but not all – post-secondary contexts I have experiences) where students are able to access information in different formats and represent their learning in different ways.

Regarding “community-centred” learning, I have experienced some online courses that have been able to develop a sense of community among the learners in an online environment. When I think about these situations, the following factors have been present:

  •  Multiple opportunities for students to work together in smaller groups
  • A learning environment where learners were encouraged to take risks
  • A learning environment where learners were asked to help each other learn

 

On a different (but related) note, there has been some work done by the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation in the OECD called the Innovative Learning Environments Project which also refers to attributes or principles of learning. The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice is a lengthy document, but worth the read. Chapter 8 specifically deals with Learning with Technology and provides a framework to distinguish the difference between technology-centred and learner-centred approaches to learning with technology. The chapter can be found here.

The research for the project was synthesized to identify 7 principles of learning. They include the following concepts:

  •  Learners at the centre of the learning (includes self-regulation)
  • The social nature of learning (encourages the well-organized cooperative learning)
  • Emotions are integral to learning (recognizing the role of emotions in achievement)
  • Recognizing individual differences (includes recognizing prior knowledge and makes room for differentiation)
  • Stretching all students (work is challenging without excessive overload)
  • Assessment for learning (a strong emphasis on effective formative assessment)
  • Building horizontal connections (promoting connectedness across community and the wider world)

(from The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice – Practitioner Guide from the Innovative Learning Environments Project available here)

Jo

 

 

4 comments

  1. You’ve raised some really interesting points here Jo, and I appreciate that you’ve maintained a focus on equitable and just considerations into the needs of the individual students. Your three points of what makes for good community-centered learning are spot on, and it was good for me to see a visual reminder of them when reflecting on what has or hasn’t been working in my own efforts to creating online learning environments for my students.
    Thanks, too, for the link to that book chapter, it definitely looks worth the read and I’ve bookmarked it. What you’ve provided in that list is certainly interesting – I wonder what is the best way to encourage the emotional side of teaching and learning, when doing work online?

    1. Good question. I wonder if the question is more accurately reframed as ” how do we ensure that learners are able to attend to their emotional needs in an on-line environment”. I think it might have to do with the types of learning activities we create (that allows for more types and choice if interactions. It has been something I have definitely been thinking about.
      Jo

  2. Hi Jo, Hi Kate;

    I also had a problem with taking the ‘learner’ out of ‘learner-centred’ and changing it to ‘learning centred’. Mind you it is worth keeping both in mind. I just find the minute that a student gets the feeling that they have been taken out of the equation, they go into rote-learning mode where they learn or do whatever is needed to get through the course but nothing more. At the end of the course, all is forgotten as they are happy to move on with their real lives. (OK, I may be projecting here just a little bit, LOL.)

    The idea that a teacher (outside of elementary school) caring about the emotions of their students is a radical one. However, anything an instructor can do to keep their students’ passion for learning ignited is a high worthwhile endeavour.

    I remember reading once that the best master is not the one with the most students but the one that creates the most masters. I am always impressed when a teacher inspires me to go beyond the immediate lesson to something that can create change in the world.

    Kind regards,
    Tanya

    1. Hi Tanya,

      I actually think you aren’t projecting. Well, maybe, but it can be true as well. 🙂
      The understanding of how emotions are linked to learning is growing. At it’s simplest level, we do not learn well (or at all for some people) when stressed.
      Check out http://sel.ecps.educ.ubc.ca/research-studies/ when you have some time.
      Most of the work I have read and seen has to do with K-12, but I am interested in seeing work with adult learners. I think it is a lot more applicable than many realize.
      Jo

Leave a Reply