Proposal Project and Progress

Welcome back to our blog site!

We have been working away on our project for the Little-Mountain Riley Park Food Hub and recently finished our proposal report.

Weekly Objectives

As a recap, in the previous weeks we focused on meeting with our community partner and drafting our project proposal. In the following three weeks, our objectives are as follows:

  • February 15th-19th: We will develop a set of criteria to choose the workshops that we incorporate into our workshop package. These criteria will be developed through 1) a review of workshops that are available and climate appropriate; 2) engaging with our community partner regarding what workshops would be most viable and needed for the Food Hub; and 3) bringing our criteria to the community partner and inquiring if she believes them to be sufficient
  • February 22nd-26th: Our plan for this week is to begin choosing workshops using our criteria.
  • February 29th-March 4th: In this week, we will continue to search and choose workshops. We will also use this time to begin drafting a design for our package; while we could start this now, we believe that it is necessary to have some idea of the workshops we are selecting to make the layout and usability of the package as good as possible.

Achievements

Our main achievement thus far was the completion of the our project proposal draft. Working through the aim and objects have helped narrow the scope of this project. It helped our group members connect to one another as well. We now understand how to better incorporate each other’s’ strength in assignments and support our individual goals for the project. We reflected on the feedback from our proposal. This allows us to be more efficient, and it keeps the group morale up during difficult steps in the process.

Moment of Significance

What? The selection of workshops was initially going to be chosen by our group. However, after speaking with Will Valley and key stakeholders in the community it became clear that a set of criteria should be used to determine which workshops to select.

So What? Workshops should not be chosen solely on the preferences of our group mates. We we do not have the experience, nor are we a representation of the Little-Mountain Riley Park community. In order to present the most viable education plan possible we must involve key stakeholders in both the design and evaluation of our criteria. Realizing this is how we will apply the Asset-Based Community Development method was profound because it means we have established the foundation. By doing so, it creates an opportunity for the goals of all to be understood and synthesized into one cohesive set of criteria. This method will allow for the diversity of participants and interests to be addressed in our education package (McCullum et al, 2010).

Now What? As a group we have chosen to base our decisions on a set of criteria we develop based on workshops that have worked in areas and climates similar to Vancouver and workshops that the community key stakeholders identify as valuable. We will need to have criteria present in order for workshops to be chosen that are inclusive of the community as well as workshops that promote food literacy in the community.

Upcoming Objectives

  • Communicate with community members to develop set of criteria to choose workshops.
  • Contact other community gardens in Vancouver and ask what workshops they are using and offering.
  • Run workshop ideas by Joanne to ensure both parties are happy with where the project is heading

Upcoming strategies

  • Email community members with set of questions to narrow criteria down and include section for any additional comments about the type of workshops that will be offered.
  • Meet with Joanne again to become clear with the aim of the project. After sending the proposal to Joanne it became clear that there was a disconnect between what Joanne wanted and what we perceived that she wanted. We believe another meeting should clear up any confusion about the project aim we are having. During the meeting we will try to reiterate our understanding of the project back to Joanne to ensure that both parties are on the same page.

 

References

  • McCullum, C., Desjardins, E., Kraak, V. I., Ladipo, P., & Costello, H. (2005). Evidence-based strategies to build community food security. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(2), 278–283.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *