After watching the videos and reading an article or two about Second Life I really have to wonder if libraries have a place in Second Life. Given the current climate in libraries, budget cuts, reduction in staffing, increase in use and circulation, do librarians really have time for Second Life? Is Second Life on its way out? I fully understand the usefulness and application of most of the social media tools for librarians and libraries that we’ve explored in this class. With a few exceptions, (Tumblr and Glogster), I appreciate their affordances and see how they could be used by libraries.
In order to have a pleasant experience in Second Life, it seems that one must have a computer that can handle it as well as a really good internet connection. This makes SL inaccessible to lots of people.
I never got a chance to fully explore Second Life, and if I find that I have the time and inclination I hope to someday. I did pick out a name for my avatar, Flossy Glendale, and chose a red-head avatar (since, in my mind I’m still a red-head but people have recently told me otherwise). As fellow Simmons student, Emily Singley, pointed out on the discussion board, “Many of the professors and students here at Simmons doubt the relevance of SL for libraries – or at least, that has been my impression so far.” That’s been my experience as well at the Simmons GSLIS West campus. Perhaps that’s why I approached this module with bias. I was hoping that other students’ experience of SL would dissuade me of my bias but it never happened. It seems like there’s a general opinion that we don’t see how SL is useful for libraries or librarians.
If the future of libraries is mobile (as more and more people have smart phones), how does SL fit into this picture? Some smart phones can support augmented reality (not the iPhone, though), and I think this may be the future of virtual worlds. Will there be a Second Life mobile app?
