(please don't actually make like a tree and leave... make like grass and re[a]d!)

Right vs. Right (or Wrong vs. Wrong?) Consumer Dilemma

In The New Rules of Green Marketing, Ottman mentions different ways of segmenting customers, since traditional segments are not necessarily applicable when thinking about how to market a “green” product/service. One method is to segment customers based on their green interests. Ottman categorized them as:

  1. Resource Conservers,
  2. Health Fanatics,
  3. Animal Lovers, and
  4. Outdoor Enthusiasts.

Living in Vancouver, and hearing these interests be part of conversation every day, it’s not surprising to see overlap. So what is a customer to do when a product/service strictly appeals to just one segment?

In my own experience, previously working for a company that prides itself on its natural, cruelty-free skin care products, I found myself in this dilemma – do I purchase products that are supposedly healthier, or those with a lower apparent environmental impact? Even further, what about when buying for family and friends? Below is a specific case I face (pun intended), and have yet to figure out the “right” choice.

Lush vs. Rocky Mountain Soap Company

Lush is known for their active fight against animal testing and naked packaging. However, looking at their ingredients, there are often “safe synthetics” listed. Through my ingredient/skin care training, I had learned that there is much argument against those claims, as many are yet to be proven safe (see the Dirty Dozen and Skin Deep). Perhaps this balances out with the naked packaging, though, cutting down on waste and emissions in manufacturing and recycling/disposal. Along with this, their take-back program encourages the recycling of their containers.

Rocky Mountain Soap, on the other hand, is a local company from Canmore, AB that only uses ingredients that are proven to be safe (rather than simply avoiding those proven to be unsafe). When shopping for myself and my family, I always consider the fact that we have sensitive skin and that using “natural” products tends to prevent irritation. However, I am constantly concerned about the amount of waste created through the products’ life cycles – regardless of how recyclable the packaging is.

This is a dilemma similar to the common argument of hand dryer (less waste) vs. paper towel (more hygenic). Given the state of the skin care industry in Canada at the moment, I have yet to find a company that strikes a balance between the two – human health and the environment. However, I encourage you to think about the green interests you have, and how they may be affecting your consumption habits.

P.S Please share your opinion on which products would be the “right” choice for you in the comments!

Sources:

Lush. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Jan. 2017.

Ottman, Jacquelyn A. “Chapter 2: We Are All Green Consumers.” The New Rules of Green Marketing: Strategies, Tools, and Inspiration for Sustainable Branding. Sheffield: Greenleaf, 2011. N. pag. Print.

Rocky Mountain Soap Company. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Jan. 2017.

»

Spam prevention powered by Akismet