I would argue that as a developed species, humans are capable of many things. We have opposable thumbs and technology that set us apart from most mammals and less than eight legs which means we are not arachnid like, so why is it that when it comes to horrific cultural events we tend to have the memory of goldfish?
In our Global Citizens CAP stream and history class, we are talking about the causes, the events, the outcome, minor and major details, key agents, etc. of World War Two. Yet when looking at all the articles, books and texts, it is easy to notice the year gap from when the war happened and when the books were published. For example the Second World War happened from 1939-1945 but Louie Zamperini’s book Unbroken, detailing his euphoric high of competing in the Berlin Olympics to being taken prisoner by Japanese soldiers was only published in 2010. The same is for Obasan, and Australia’s Forgotten Prisoners being published in 1981 and 2007 respectively.
Maybe we can blame this on the lack of resources to record and print these memories/ stories; there was simply no time to write about what was happening after the war because people were too busy trying to rebuild themselves and their community. We could also blame it on the pain that comes with bringing up such recent and tragic events. Yet, there is The Diary of Anne Frank, which details the extent of her time while hiding in the attic from German troops during the Holocaust. Maybe it is because it is easier to heal when you forget than when you have to struggle through the painful truth. My only other idea could be based on Paul Connerton’s theory of humiliated silence (http://mss.sagepub.com/content/1/1/59.short). In his article 7 Types of Forgetting, he uses the German silence after the war as an example of how tabooed an event can become that it leads to mass silence. Connerton also has this to say on humiliated silence,
“…some acts of silence may be an attempt to bury things beyond expression and the reach of memory; yet such silencing, while they are a type of repression, can at the same time be a form of survival, and the desire to forget may be an essential ingredient in that process of survival (68).”
Could this hint that in order for the German people to continue to identify as German and live with themselves after such heinous acts of violence, they had to forget? Or that until recently, there have be no adequate ways to describe what happened?
The thing that interests me most about this subject is that when books or movies are released about these tragic events, they become bestsellers. Which is strange because the thing that everyone was trying to hide, is now the thing that everyone is talking about. We see this with Obasan, which is a very famous Canadian novel, and Unbroken which is a Time 2010 Nonfiction book of the year and is about to be premiered as a major motion picture. The other explanation could be that we like to see how other countries messed up, hence America finding Unbroken and Fury, which obviously make the Axis powers seem like brutal, barbaric, cruel people, very interesting movies. Yet this is not something that just applies to World War Two or other terrible world events.
Mental illness is something that the majority of people tend to not discuss. Just as there was a taboo on speaking about World War 2, there is a certain taboo about discussing depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia etc. There are even asylums built to keep people with mental illnesses out of the general population; which is a concept that existed in WW2 where many of these people were killed by the same Nazi regime that killed thousands of Jewish people. A recent example of mental illness gaining a voice and being drawn to the attention of millions of people came in the form of Oscar award winning movie Silver Linings Playbook. It tells the story of a man (played by Bradley Cooper) who suffers from bipolar disorder and a woman (played by Jennifer Lawrence) who is suffering from neurosis. It was nominated multiple times at 29 awards shows, winning many including Jennifer Lawrence for Best Actress at the Golden Globes and the Academy awards and Best Film at multiple shows. After that something that had remained a very private issue was the subject of a large public discussion.
In a way we have Hollywood to thank for creating such a large discussion and awareness of the things we used to silence. While we still resemble goldfish as we often forget the things that had been so widely talked about and replace it with a new issue or event, memorials, organizations, etc. are often put in place that leave some reminder.
As Remembrance Day approaches, the silence that is usually held around wars is often dropped. There are veterans scattered around towns handing out poppy pins, there are people everywhere wearing those poppies and the media often broadcasts veteran stories or important details. It is the one dedicated time of year when we pay our respects to the people that served, listen to their stories and make all the memories that were silenced, loud. Although many people forget about why we have Remembrance Day the other 364 days of the year, it is a small step to make the things we want to forget something that we can learn from, remember and use to make the future a better place.
Connerton, Paul. “Seven types of forgetting.” Memory Studies 1.1 (2008): 59-71. Web. 18 Oct.
Hillenbrand, Laura. Unbroken. United States of America: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2010. Print.
Kogawa, Joy. Obasan. Toronto: Penguin Books, 1981. Print.
Twomey, Christina. Australia’s Forgotten Prisoners, Civilians Interned by the Japanese in World War Two. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print.
Meghan- I think this was an amazing blog post filled with tons of great ideas! I love your casual yet serious tone of writing in your posts, it is an effective way to engage the reader. I had similar thoughts to you about the idea of something so large in history being hidden and silenced for a period of time and then all of sudden when given attention in the media erupts into a popular subject. I am curious why we romanticize war and corruption and controversy so much but I believe it comes directly from our reliance on technology. Our society craves drama and stories. That’s why certain news channels intentionally create a program centralized around fear. With headlines like “Ebola is spreading!!” And, “rapist on the loose!” They want to draw in listeners by making them succumb to the fear because then out of fascination the viewer desires more. I am all for novels like Obasan gaining the attention they deserve from media outlets and consumers, I just think it’s important to understand WHY it is we care about certain things at certain times. Just like the “Kony 2012” videos, they were a fad for while via twitter and Facebook and other social media devices, but as soon as people got bored of it, it was silenced once again.
While reading your blog, I could not help but feel that I agree with you on our negligence and forgetting of traumatic memory. If I were to be a pessimist, I would say that humans in general are self-interested and selfish and so we do not try to seek out stories of those who have experienced horrendous things. This may be the case with many people, but as you mentioned, those who have been affected and harmed, try to forget those experiences to help themselves and others recover from the trauma by staying silent. I think the second reason why people tend to stay silent about and “forget” cruel human experiences is further explored in Joy Kogawa’s Obasan. If we analyze and understand the character of Obasan in the story as to why she stays silent, we may find an answer to why some memories are not voiced out.
This was a very interesting blog post to read. You begin by discussing World War II and the time gap between the actual war and the knowledge/ story telling about it. This is a very compelling observation to make. You then took a very abrupt turn and brought up the topic of mental illness and how it can be portrayed in the media. At first this seemed a little choppy to me because you switched topics so suddenly, but as I read on I noticed the flowing transitions you made to connect all these different ideas. You related mental illness to the events of World War II very well, and then went even further in your conclusion to relate the entirety of the paper to remembrance day. I was very impressed by the ideas you illustrated throughout this blog post. It pushed me to make connections to things I wouldn’t normally have found a correlation between. Great Job.
This is a very interesting discussion you brought up Meghan. I found it very interesting to see your perspective on how humans interact with the past and I would like to share mine! As much as it is important to remember the past, it is also equally if not more important to find out how to move forward. We can’t spend everyday of our lives remembering the horrors of each act of conflict that Canada has been a part of, so we build monuments or create technologies of memory so that we can remember them when we have the time. To my best knowledge, Canada does not have a physical memorial to recognize the internment of Japanese Canadians during the second world war, but we do have technologies of memory, such as the novel Obasan, to keep this event from being forgotten. If we look at technologies of memory as ways to memorialize and remember our past, it is hardly legitimate to characterize the human memory as close to that of a goldfish. Looking at Obasan, although just one small example, the fact that we are reading and learning about this event in a public university class is quite a strong act of remembrance I would say. Fairly though there are many horrific events that have taken place that we simply do not always have the time to look back on. It seems that to rid ourselves of this “goldfish” mentality we must find a balance between remembering the past, and moving forward.