I am compelled to think that to write an introduction about oneself may fall into two broad categories: A long-drawn, soul-searching analysis on the self and one’s innermost feelings, or a small paragraph simply introducing conventional facts, such as one’s name, school, and year of study. Since the former would be too novel, and the latter perhaps too plain, this is my attempt to write something which could be defined as a midpoint between the two.
My name is Melissa Zhou. I study international relations and political science at UBC. I was raised here in the world of glassy buildings, sound bridges, solid trees, healthy children, and concrete park-benches here in Vancouver, BC. This may sound absurd, but since I have never really been to many other parts of the world (partly due to never having a chance to travel, and partly due to my tendency for clinging to familiar routines), I feel that a substantial portion of my knowledge about the world is derived from books, films, and academia, rather than first-hand experience. The world itself seems to have a significantly fictional quality, not simply the material that I read, and this makes it so that there is a dualistic quality about it all β about the infinite perceptual experiences, political rants, and philosophical explications that dwell in books, and the way that they reflect not concrete objective reality itself, but the subjective intricacies of the mind and the human experience. And perhaps this dualistic quality is what makes literature such an enthralling art form for me. Literature has always been of primary interest to me from a young age, and my bookish tendencies have shaped my perception of the world through introspection, amateurish philosophy, and poetic self-expression.
Given that literature has tickled my fancy for quite a long time, I can safely argue that the acts of reading and writing has always been my outlet for understanding, expressing, and contending with the puzzling intricacies of human life. If I must be honest, however, the time that I allocate to these two activities have dwindled since arriving in university, owing to other responsibilities that have settled into my life. But my interest in literature has never left me. Within the realm of literature, furthermore, I have always been intrigued by this tendency to break established norms; to confront the fact that the human condition is not fixed, but in fact fluid and subjective; and to not simply ‘experience’ the world, but to express these experiences in an explorative manner, especially in the use of experimental language structures.
Thus, in the video lecture introducing Romance studies and languages, what intrigued me deeply was this idea of the Romance languages “pushing at limits and constructing something new”. I feel that a glimpse of my own stance on literature rings through this statement, simply because I have always had a bias for reading modernist and experimental literature, which are categories that often disregard conformity to traditional plot structures. However, I must admit that I have never read literature belonging to Romance world β aside from a tattered copy of Proust that I own, whose pages are yellowed and almost unreadable β and this is something that I am excited to be doing.
Although I am aware that there is a rigorous amount of work to do in order to achieve my desired grade, I am sure that this class will reinforce my interest in literature, and contribute to my familiarity with a much broader amount of texts!
Hi Melissa, and welcome to the course! You’ll certainly find a fair amount of “modernist and experimental literature” here. We are definitely interested in rethinking and perhaps breaking established norms.
One clarification: in my lecture I wasn’t suggesting that the “Romance languages” were a non-existent category… rather I was questioning the idea of a “Romance world.”
Hello Professor Beasley-Murray,
I apologize for the error! I have edited this blogpost to account for that.
Thank you for pointing that out π
Hi Melissa, I just wanted to say I love how descriptive your writing is, especially in the introductory paragraph, I felt like I was reading the start of a novel. I also like what you said about the human experience being “fluid”. I feel that’s reflective of what was talked about in the lecture video on the Romance World, where the right answer is often “I don’t know” seeing as not everything can be put in a box or pointed out on a map. It seems to be that origins of the Romance World and Romance languages are also rather fluid.
Whoops, didn’t see ths earlier!
Thanks for your comment Sofia! There is definitely often a lack of a right answer in literature, I feel that way as well. Very excited to be in the class with people also learning about this content.
Best,
Nice to meet you, Melissa!! Your writing is so eloquent :0!! I also have a tendency to stick with genres or time periods I’m familiar with. Modernist literature is so interesting when looking at the form and historicity of the works π
Thanks for your comment Nana! it is nice to be in the class with others interested in modernism! Best,
Hi Melissa!
I absolutely loved the way you write, truly pulled me in from the first sentence. My favourite part, though, is how you have described the human experience as ‘fluid and subjective’. Studying human behaviour, I can only attest to how true I think that is as well. Can’t wait to read more from you!
OH, I have a belated question… about the picture of the bookshelf on your blog. Are those your books?