A lot of the things in life are done so precisely owing to ephemerality. The pace of time seems only to quicken, and so the need for creating something grand, for something eloquent, draws people towards leaving behind the mark of a meaningful struggle before any ends are met. Symbols of having existed must be left somewhere in the universe — even if marginal, like a scratch on the moon — to represent the seed of consciousness that carried us from sleep to wakening, as the fossil of an epiphany soon to be covered under the dust of a million years. The line from The Waste Land in the title of this post testifies to the sense of despair, and yet of restoration, in the ends that precede new beginnings.
I am listening to Spanish Bombs. It was playing during the lecture on Nada, and I really liked it. I am writing this blog with the intention that it is read in light of the somewhat sad, but semi-hopeful, semi-sentimental mood embodied by the music.
Writing is inescapably intimate. With just a sequence of syllables, set into arrangement by an outline of rudimentary letters, the secrecies of the human condition are made known in their most private form. In other words, there is a certain quality of rawness to literature. Even when done with haste, it in some way or another exposes an individual’s subjective biases, worldviews, and personal feelings. The texts in this course reflect this because they are associated with modernism in literature, an artistic movement characterized by its break from traditional forms of expression, and indulgence upon the inner workings of the mind. Literature is not singular and fixed but changeable and subject to interpretation. It is not separate from the world, but an active reflection of the world to which it belongs. In international relations theory there are positivistic approaches to the world order that emphasize the measurability of the world through the collection of empirical data, as well as hermeneutical, or reflectivist ones, recognizing the full-blown subjectivity pervading the social world and our interpretations of it. Theory is literary, and literature is at its core hermeneutical. It is constructed by subjective biases, bound to offering critical insights into the social atmosphere at a given place and point in history. In this course, the texts that we read embodied the lives, mentalities, and cultures of people associated with the Romance languages. I have come to deeply admire literature from this tradition — I deeply admire the way in which they push against limits and defy conventional forms of writing. After all, a work of literature is never fully complete but constantly evolving, even under the eyes of its readers, exposing the fluid nature of human thought and perception. Previously, I have only read British Modernist literature. Reading works of literature associated with the Romance languages has expanded my knowledge on the ability of literature to expose these underlying perceptual dynamics. At the same time, it has deepened my appreciation of literature itself, and how it is able to respond to different social and historical contexts from the individual level of analysis.
The booklist in this course is my favorite booklist out of all the courses I have ever taken (perhaps on equal grounds with the Arts One booklist). There are many similarities between the books — many melancholic characters, with unknown lives and unknown faces, who are neither purely geniuses nor purely paupers but simply individuals who feel, who are sensible, who are observers, who carry a stream of remarkable thoughts to be dissected under the percipient wand of poetry. If I must choose some favorite texts, they would be Nada and The Time of the Doves. But I liked most of them.
Words are the medium of literature. To read is to swim through a thousand different thoughts, which course into one another and feed into their own philosophical power. However, since words spring from and exist within a social context, their meanings are interpreted differently by different people. A certain degree of interpretative freedom is therefore inescapable. The structure of this course complements this freedom. Given that we were able to select our own required readings, and to write freely, without being bound to rigorous guidelines, it allows people to expand on their own interpretations without the need to conform to pre-established boundaries. Too many people nowadays are forced to conform, to be commonplace, or even worse, to stay silent — the world needs more people who dare to explore, to break social straitjackets in order to pursue their own intellectual journeys.
Life is nonsensical. I think that all of the books reflect this, each in different ways. All of them expose a certain quality of loneliness, of absurdity characterizing the human condition.
But I suppose that is how it is. Like colliding stars, our lives speed across the galactic of the world before intersecting, only to separate again; where in the world our peers go, is not exactly known; but what is known at least is that they are out there, somewhere, beyond one’s reach and yet within the boundaries of this same, strange, indefinable world, treading through the obstacles of daily life and thinking perhaps, reflecting, from time to time, over what they’ve read in this course.