Toyota and Dawn Soaps

toyota_logo

Toyota Logo

Bogdan’s blog entry reminds me of a similar issue with the soap brand Dawn. His blog says that Toyota markets their sustainability and social responsibility, yet the Toyota Prius contains a chemical that causes physical harm to the villagers in the area in which it is mined. Similarly, Dawn Soaps’ advertising is deceiving. The company has produced commercials that show people bathing oil-drenched ducks using their soap. Yes, this comes off as heart-warming; however, an ingredient in Dawn products is actually toxic to water organisms.

I cannot rationalize how companies like Toyota and Dawn Soaps are able to market themselves as doing ‘good’, yet actually be harmful to people and animals. It is unfortunate that most consumers are oblivious to the business practices carried out these companies. The fact that they take advantage of our lack of knowledge regarding sourcing of products is simply unfair.  I think that if people were more informed, they would be less likely to purchase products from Toyota and Dawn Soaps. Since I became aware of this issue with Dawn, I have not bought their soaps.

Why does business have to be so deceitful?

Dawn Soap Bottle

Dawn Soap Bottle

 

Image 1

Image 2

 

 

 

Blog #2 – Consumers of This Generation

 

iPhone 6

iPhone 6 & iPhone 6 Plus

 

This article is the perfect example of consumers of this generation.

Apple started accepting pre-orders for its new iPhones, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, last week. Already, thousands of orders have been sent – so many that Apple is having difficulty keeping up with the demand. Apple reported having the most pre-orders ever the night ordering opened up.

Now, what are the differences between the iPhone 6 and the last one? It has a larger screen, a better camera and a longer battery life. But by how much has each of these features improved?

People in my generation are easily subjective to marketing. I think my generation is the consumption age.  Most people always want the latest and greatest toy. And that’s why Apple had record-breaking pre-orders for the iPhone 6. It seems we are never content with what we have, we always want more! We fall into marketers trap; we think we need a new product and, subsequently, go and buy a new product. Someone may buy a new iPhone although his or her current one works perfectly fine. Then, what will that someone do with their old iPhone? They will probably throw it into the garbage where it will join the other ‘old’ iPhones in the landfill.

 

Image 1

 

Corporate Business Ethics

Corporate Business Ethics

Reference Article

The objective of business is to make money. Even at the expense of other people. Business owners would not be in business if there were no opportunities to generate profit. Decades ago, companies, for example Levi Jeans, manufactured their products in North America. However, with that objective in mind, production was moved to foreign lands where business owners could take advantage of non-existent laws protecting workers. They could pay people disgustingly small wages and enforce long hours, even upon children. Fortunately, over the decades people have become aware of production practices in third-world countries and codes-of-conduct have been implemented to protect workers.

However, these codes-of-conduct are not always practiced. For example, of the 276 factories analyzed by Richard Locke manufacturing for HP, only 7 were actually following proper conduct. When companies become so large, it is difficult to ensure proper practices are carried out. Even so, with today’s “just-in-time manufacturing” philosophy, workers in corporate factories are constantly on time constraints. Keeping up with product launches, such as by Apple, forces workers to work longer hours to complete the job.

Economist R. Edward Freeman (Stakeholder Theory) believes that for a company to be successful, all stakeholders need to contribute.  If employees are not happy, then they are not acting at their highest potential and their creativity is limited. With current conditions for workers, I don’t think their productivity and contribution is maximized. Wage increases that enable a higher standard of living for workers and a safer working environment would improve their output. I think that any company, like HP and Levi Jeans, would be better off simply by doing this.

Realistically, however, I think that if businesses were really interested in doing business ethically, products would be made in countries where laws restrict their power.

Image 1

Image 2

Hello world!

Welcome to UBC Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Spam prevention powered by Akismet