Tag Archives: Nada

RMST202 in a nutshell: Shitty men, intrusive thoughts, nameless characters, and death

Alas, we have reached the end of this course! This course was strangely nowhere near what I expected but in the best way possible. I think the texts we have read and the discussions we have had, truly make me think about literature in different ways which was one of my main goals for this course. Often times I usually just take the text for what it is, but it was interesting to apply the context of the environment and time period to truly understand some of the intentions of these novels. 

I think if I had to pick a favourite novel for this course, it would be Nada by Carmen Laforet, which is strange because I remember that not many people chose that book. I felt like I experienced every emotion possible while reading that book. Seeing such a significant change in Andrea’s character and her own narrative perceptions of herself truly stuck with me the most. I also think it was so interesting how Laforet’s writing made me love a character on one page, but then absolutely despise them on the next. Usually, I feel like when I have a perception about a certain character, it is really difficult for a book to change my mind about them because I either want to defend them or absolutely trash their entire existence, but for some reason, this book gave me whiplash the entire time. I found myself being able to justify certain characters who I know deep down are still horrible people, and despise characters who I initially liked. Looking back on it now, Andrea’s friendship with Ena kind of resembles Elena’s friendship with Lila in My Brilliant Friend in terms of dynamics, jealousy, and reliance (although I will admit I liked Andrea and Ena’s friendship way more).

My least favourite book without a doubt has to be The Time of the Doves by Mercè Rodoreda. Honestly, I feel like I don’t really have a good reason for hating this book other than I simply just didn’t like it. I felt like I was so frustrated the entire time that it just wasn’t enjoyable for me. Every single character made me angry to the point where I didn’t really care much about them or about what happened to them so I never got invested in the novel. I noted how it has similar themes to Nada regarding changes in perception and character after one goes off to fight in the war, but every time I think about that damn tapeworm in a jar I need to take a few minutes to meditate. 

I mentioned this in one of my previous blogs but I literally had to start keeping track of how many Judas metaphors there were in these books and out of the 11 books that I read there were a whopping 6. Which doesn’t seem like a lot but it’s quite interesting to notice. I realized that most of the times they would pop up as metaphors regarding betrayal obviously, even though it could be recognized as one of the more subtle themes across these books. I am not a religious person myself, but I do enjoy the Lady Gaga song therefore to describe my experience of this course, I would use that song.

Question: What song would you pick to encapsulate this course and why?

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Nada; 1945’s reality TV

This week I read Nada by Carmen Laforet and oh boy was that a journey of drama, pain, and chaos. I did find myself really enjoying Laforet’s writing style, it felt like I was reading Andrea’s diary so that made me feel like I was more connected to the character. I was so confused about what to feel about certain characters. I liked them on one page and then they would go do the most outrageous action completely changing my perspective on the character. I kind of liked it though, it kept me on my toes while reading and made me think about what necessarily makes a character ‘good’ and what makes them ‘bad’. Something I have been noticing as a common theme that brings me back to Swann’s Way is the love and admiration for architecture. Andrea is constantly talking about the beautiful cathedrals of Barcelona and they are always described in such detail it feels like taking a long breath after reading through such rich dialogue.

I think one of the main themes of this book was the idea of rebellion. At first, Andrea seems like such a people-pleaser, she always wanted to validate the opinions of her family around her. However, it was in those moments of rebellion that I found Andrea to be the most comfortable with herself. For example, she knew that sleeping in Angustias’ bed would definitely make her angry, yet she continued to sleep in her bed during the time Angustias was away. Similarly, I think her need for rebellion also made her more independent when she no longer ate food at home and rather discovered foods such as dried fruits and nuts. I think Andrea strived for this careless happiness that she could only find in rebellion.

“I was taking nothing from the house on Calle de Aribau. At least, that’s what I thought then.” (244)

This quote is so interesting to me because I interpret it as meaning how someone’s environment and circumstances can unconsciously change someone’s attitude. We see this throughout the whole book. How Román is always emphasized to have changed after the war, and how the whole family is not this romanticized image that Andrea had of them before arriving at the Calle de Aribau.

I think my favourite part of this whole book was Andrea’s relationship with Ena. That friendship (although questionable at moments) was something that I found myself hoping I could grasp on to throughout the whole book. When Andrea ultimately moves away to live near Ena and work for her father, I found myself really comforted by this show of genuine friendship, something that I think Andrea was only partially able to experience with Pons.

My question for this week would be: How do we see Andrea’s outlook and attitude shift over the span of the book as she spends more and more time with her family at Calle de Aribau?

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized