Here’s the agenda and schedule for our Monday meetings:
See you then.
– Lawrence
Today I met with most of the TCs that I teach in POT/COM class but don’t supervise on practicum. The purpose of this meeting was twofold. I wanted to:
Thanks to all who attended today’s meetings. I really enjoyed reading your pieces and talking about them with you.
By the way, here’s the rubric I used in my assessment:
– Lawrence
WHERETO
After a few drama activities to get you warmed up – Zip, Zap, Bop, Bang! and the Martha Game – we played with WHERETO, an acronym that summarizes the key elements that should be in your learning plan / lesson sequence. Here’s the WHERETO information package we worked with:
The WHERETO task was as follows:
In doing this task, I was trying to model one way to use drama as a means of working with content.
Unit Plan Sharing
After asking for suggestions on how to approach the unit plan sharing piece, we decided to do the following:
I asked you to consider what you were considering through the WHERETO lens. In the post-sharing debrief, many of you mentioned that you had picked up some great ideas that you could weave into your own planning. Success!
Differentiated Instruction
The T in WHERETO stands for tailored; how will we tailor learning to varied needs, interests, [and] styles?
Pre-and During-Reading:
Things got pretty meta here as I differentiated my instruction on differentiated instruction. I provided you with a selection of articles (DI – content) and suggested that, as you read, you could make sense of the text in a way that worked for you (DI – process). Some noted that they would take notes in the margins, others were going to mind map the text, others were going to summarize each paragraph, and, well, the list went on.
Here are the articles we were working with:
Post-Reading:
When the articles were read, I urged you to engage in an activity that would allow you to consolidate your understanding of the reading (DI – process). Some chatted with a peer while others took notes on how they could use the ideas from the texts in their own practice. To end, I aimed high, as I asked for any epiphanies you had while reading.
That’s all for today.
– Lawrence
I hope you enjoyed Zerbe’s lecture this morning. Here’s the link to his Prezi:
Also, here’s a link to a research article related to John Hattie’s Visible Learning book, a text that came up numerous times during Zerbe’s presentation.
Cheers,
– Lawrence
Practicum Seminar
Many thanks to Rod Brown, Elementary and Middle Years Prac Coordinator for presenting his Long Practicum Seminar.
After the session, you had lots of questions so I spent quite a bit of time taking them up in class. Teaching loads was one topic that was addressed. Below you’ll find a graphic organizer – Overview of Teaching Assignments for EDUC 419 – that shows you the percentages that you should (approximately) be teaching at during each week of the prac and allows you to indicate which subject you’ll be teaching and when:
Just a reminder that the percentages on the form indicate the percentage of your SA’s load that you’ll be assuming. For example, if your SA teaches in a school with 6 blocks per day, teaching 5 of those 6 blocks per day is a full load. So…
Task & Book Collection
I collected any Lit Kit books yet to be handed in, gathered hard copies of your Double-Entry Journal and accepted any good copy haikus that were still floating around.
LLED 320 Integrated Unit Plan Due Date
On Tuesday, 8 March 2011, the task’s due date, I asked you to please bring:
Lit Circle Resources
I pointed you to the following resources to utilize as you teach reading in your classroom:
Here’s one resource I didn’t show you because I just found it moments ago. It’s selected bits from a book by Lit Circle guru Harvey Daniels and Nancy Steineke, Mini-Lessons for Literature Circles. Here’s the link to portions of the text. Also, here’s Harvey talking briefly about his conception of LCs:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-2rhRYB4hk[/youtube]
Concluding Brownlie’s Comprehension Strategies Video
We wrapped up by finishing the video (found at this link) and discussing a few things that stood out for you in it.
That’s all for today. Enjoy your weekend.
– Lawrence
Here’s what we managed to wedge into today’s POT class:
Calendar
Here are some dates to remember:
Classroom Management: Working with Barrie Bennett’s Theory of Bumps
Connecting
I asked you to think back to your classroom experience and…
“Recall a student who was beginning to stop you from teaching or stop others from learning. Perhaps they were pencil tapping, talking to a classmate, or calling out. How did you respond to that student?”
We took a few responses. As it turns out, many of you were already using some of the techniques advocated by Bennett in Bump 1 – Preventing and Responding to Misbehaviour Through Low-Key Responses.
Processing
I used this PPT slidewshow to give you some background with Bump 1:
Next, partnerships presented short role plays demonstrating NO and YES examples on how to use 12 low-key techniques. Each role play was followed up with a quick blurb on how to use the technique effectively and artfully.
The responses fall into two categories and are as follows:
Responding Strategies
Here’s an example of “The Look”. Watch and determine if it’s a NO or a YES example:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNEmyHsqoVY[/youtube]
Here’s a musical example of “The Look”. Please wield this one with extreme caution:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlVI7ZNiFlI[/youtube]
Preventive Techniques
You can find all the low-key responses in this handout from Bennett’s book, Classroom Management: A Thinking & Caring Approach:
Personalizing
To close, I asked you to consider the following question and to share your thoughts as you left the classroom:
“Which of the techniques we worked with today will you add to your repertoire on practicum?”
By the way, check out this clip from Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home that I was referencing during our discussion on swearing. After watching it, I recalled that “Double dumb-a*$ on you!” was my favourite expletive of 1986. Enjoy.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WTvEbUkeLM[/youtube]
That’s a wrap.
– Lawrence
After sharing some book recommendations – I suggested you check out Kenneth Oppel’s Airborn, the first in the Matt Cruse trilogy:
– I modeled the process of developing journal criteria with students. Unfortunately, I erased the criteria we developed in class. I do, however, have the criteria I originally came up with as noted on the task handout (Children’s Literature Double-Entry Journal Task – 2011). Here they are:
In class today, we took time to write in our journals twice, once at the start of class and once at the end of our session.
In the first write, I asked you to choose two of the following topics to respond to:
For the end-of-class write, you were asked to choose two topics from the following list:
The task is due on Thursday, 3 March 2011. It should include all 3 writes (this means that you would have responded to a total of 6 items = 3 writes X 2 items per writing session). Please submit it via email or hand in a hard copy to me in class on Thursday.
Here’s a model of the DE Journal task if you would benefit from seeing the format as you develop your journal. You’ll notice my inserted comments on the right and a final blurb on the bottom:
Prepping for Lit Circle Conversations Using The Story Behind the Poem & Say Something
A great way to get students excited about a new box of thematic books is to read and consider a poem on the theme. I modeled that by using the Story Behind the Poem strategy to analyze the poem Invictus by William Ernest Henley.
Here’s the recipe for the Story Behind the Poem strategy I used:
Here’s the handout for the poem. It’s set up to accommodate the SBTP sketching:
Below is the scene from the movie Invictus that features the poem prominently. According to the movie’s production notes:
“In the film, Mandela calls upon Pienaar (the captain of the South African national rugby team, the Sprinboks, in 1995) to lead his team to greatness, citing a poem that was a source of inspiration and strength to him during his years in prison. It is later revealed that the poem is “Invictus,” by William Ernest Henley. The title is translated to mean “unconquered,” which, Eastwood (film director, Clint Eastwood) says, “doesn’t represent any one character element of the story. It takes on a broader meaning over the course of the film.”[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FozhZHuAcCs[/youtube]
When you’d had time to gather your thoughts on the poem, I asked you (a select few, in reality. We were short on time) to Say Something – your connections, questions, imrages that emerge – about the poem. Say Something is an easy, fun, and interesting strategy that should support effective discussions in the book-based discussion groups.
Brownlie suggests reminding students of the criteria for effective group discussions at the start of the Say Something and reviewing the criteria again at the end:
Lit Circle Discussion Group
Last day’s book discussion was guided by the sticky notes each participant had brought to the circle. In an effort to model another possibility for setting up the book-related talking, I posed a thematic question as a prompt:
“What has the book taught you about life and living?”
After the conversations we discussed the pros, cons, and artful nuances of structuring the conversation in such a way.
Comprehension Activities
Comprehension activities supplement the reading, discussing and journaling during Lit Circle time. This gives the students not participating in a discussion group one more thing they can be working on. One of Brownlies’s Literacy in the Middle Years – Part 2 webcasts does a nice job of covering the topic of comprehension activities. I’ve the webcast’s timecodes below:
Timecodes (all time are approximate):
▪ 0:00 – 1:45: How to Do Comp Strats
▪ 1:45 – 6:00: Containers for Characters
▪ 6:00 – 9:00: Setting Activity
▪ 9:00 – 11:30: Venn Diagram
▪ 11:30 – 13:00: Character Tree
▪ 13:00 – 16:30: Hot Seat
▪ 16:30 – 17:50: Comp Strats Create Book Buzz
▪ 17:50 – 22:00: Assessment in LCs & Wrapping Up LCs
▪ 22:00 – 25:00: End of LC “Advice Letter to the TC”
▪ 25:00 – 30:30: Ideogram
▪ 30:30 – 32:00: Call Back to 4 Conditions that Support Readers
Here’s the handout that has much of the material Brownlie references in her webcast:
Here’s another handout – this one from the first edition of the Student Diversity text – that has more details on some of the tasks discussed in the webcast, namely the Ideogram:
We only watched the first 11 minutes of the webcast today so we’ll finish it up next session.
– Lawrence
A huge thank you to Debbie Gregg, Human Resources Senior Manager in SD #43 (Coquitlam) for visiting our class and answering your “getting a job”-related questions. According to one class member, it was “the best thing we’ve done all year.” High praise indeed!
For your reference, the SD #43 website has a Job Opportunities page with info on TOC (or is it TTOC?) applications and more.
The EductationCanada.com website has lots of teaching job-related info. Of particular interest might be the page on Resume Samples and Tips.
Finally, here’s a handout with details on behavioural interviewing – the new approach to teaching interviewing utilized in Coquitlam and elsewhere – and a long list of common behavioural interview questions:
Cheers,
– Lawrence
Information Literacy Workshop
A huge thank you to Jo-Anne Naslund, Instructional Programs Librarian at the Education Library, for presenting today’s workshop, Developing Information Smarts: Inquiry in a Digital World. The Education Library website has a page devoted to the LLED 320 course and that page can be found here.
As an introduction, Jo-Anne asked us to work with the material found in a document produced by the BCTLA Info Lit Task Force, The Points of Inquiry: A Framework for Information Literacy and the 21st Century Learner (Thanks to Kaela for the link – LH). The task was to consider how each point of inquiry – connect & wonder, investigate, construct, express, and reflect – might play out in a lesson.
After the intro we got right down to work on the Developing Information Smarts Webquest, a task accessible via the Ed Lib’s LLED 320 web page. The task addresses the four main aspects of the research process:
The day wrapped up with SMART Bingo and prizes to the winners!
Of course, to be info literate, you need to be able to use the hardware. For some, that can be a real challenge…
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQHX-SjgQvQ&feature=PlayList&p=AD1FFBF34A2FE141&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=15[/youtube]
Choice Literacy Website
If you can get your hardware working, please check out this website recommended to me by Dr. Marlene Asselin, the LLED 320 coordinator – Choice Literacy. According to Marlene:
“It’s a rich and extensive collection of ideas from people on the ground – literacy leaders, coaches, and teachers. It includes:
That’s all for now.
– Lawrence
Thanks to all of today’s presenters. Our guest, Tony Clarke – one of the EDUC 310 Inquiry Project Coordinators, was impressed with your tasks.
Remember that your work is due to me today. Please zip / compress all the relevant files into one folder and email them to me at lholbrook@sd43.bc.ca.
Thanks,
– Lawrence