Tag Archives: Net Impact 2010

Tales of Giant Kangaroo Rats and Wind Turbine Health Syndrome

Officially, this session at the recent Net Impact conference was called “Hurdles to Renewable Energy Development in the US,” but the moderator provided me with the much more exciting title you see above. Moderator Ian Black opened the session with his story of a failed renewable power project in California. To listen to his version of the story, one might think that the giant kangaroo rats single handedly stopped the project. Actually, his tongue in cheek complaint about the small fuzzy mammal arose from the fact the

Giant Kangaroo Rat

Climate enemy #1: the giant kangaroo rat in his natural habitat

rodent is on the endangered species list. When all attempts to work around the habitat failed and moving the population was not an option, Black decided to kill the carbon-lite power project before it had even broken ground. The story comically indicated his frustration with the regulatory permitting process in the US and implicitly suggested that more renewable power could have been installed by now if it were not for the Endangered Species Act and all of the similar environmental red tape.

Indeed, permitting timelines differ greatly by state, from Texas (under six months) to California (over two years). The lesson to learn for the aspiring MBA hoping to get into renewable energy development was be patient and maybe reconsider your career selection if you are not the patient type. Regulations define the process of citing and developing, say, a new wind farm from start to finish.

If that’s not bad enough, Chip Reading (Director of Development, North American Wind, Acciona) introduced something called ‘Wind Turbine Health Syndrome,’ an alleged disorder that he had hoped to disprove by bringing in medical experts to state that such a thing does not exist. Reading indicated the disorder was simply a tactic that communities use to oppose the development of a new project in their area. The overriding theme for session was that the developer must struggle against NIMBY and BANANA (build absolutely nothing anywhere near anything) communities. However, beyond these games of cat and mouse, I took away some gems of knowledge from this session about the state of renewable power in the US.

The currently low price of natural gas is making renewable power projects less profitable because they must compete with new natural gas fired turbines. But most renewable generation also uses natural gas as a source of backup power in the case of a shortage of the renewable. Thus, the two competing technologies appear to have a love/hate relationship.

Another extremely important topic was the pending decision in California about whether the state will lift the cap on out-of-state produced renewable power (to 50% from 25% currently) to meet their renewable energy targets. If the deal goes through, there will be many effects. Idle wind capacity in Oregon could be put to use. Of course, BC Hydro would like to market their cheap carbon-free electricity to California at premium clean power rates, but hydro power does not count under California’s 20% by 2010 standard.

However, for me, some of the most interesting ideas were in the area of storage. Wind turbine manufacturers are developing new ways to store and slowly release the stored energy to smooth out supply. One idea is to pump compressed air into on-turbine chambers, or into limestone caves, and feed it back at night or at low wind periods. Another storage technique: make hydrogen with the extra capacity at night.

The problem with plastic water bottles

Keynote: William McDonough, author of Cradle to Cradle & Kim Jeffery, CEO of Nestlé Water, North America

“It’s a design problem.”

That’s what William McDonough said as he patiently explained his work with Nestlé Water North America on rethinking their packaging. McDonough, along with Michael Braungart is the author of the book Cradle to Cradle, an inspiring call for industrial transformation to a world where the very concept of waste is eliminated.  McDonough shared the stage with Kim Jeffery, CEO of Nestlé Water North America as Friday morning’s keynote address at the recent North American Net Impact Conference.

Nestlé Water hired McDonough’s firm to help them design a system to increase the recycling of the ever present plastic bottle. The talk covered everything from why caps are not recyclable along with the bottle to the virtues of drinking water instead of pop. CEO Jeffery probably knew that this audience was not going to welcome his company with open arms. So, the talk started with Jeffery explaining how the market for bottled water has developed over the last 20 years and the fact that their sales have largely eaten into the sales of companies like Coke and Pepsi. While perhaps this group of savvy business students should have been more appreciative of the power of the market, no one was buying the line that Nestlé Water was our savior in a transparent plastic bottle.

Indeed, the bottle itself was on the stand and the charge was unacceptable levels of waste. To many in this Nalgen carrying crowd, the solution was simple: just refill your reusable water bottle from the tap or filtered water jug and don’t buy bottled water. When Jeffery was asked why not encourage the use of reusable bottles, the auditorium erupted in applause. Meanwhile, Jeffery became visible defensive in front of the crowd of 2000 as he repeated his description of his company’s reusable five gallon bottle commercial service from earlier in the talk and ignored the obvious intend of the question to probe at the retail level.

However, despite the emotion, I think that Jeffery had made an important commitment. One that went, perhaps, under recognized at the time. As CEO of a major bottled water manufacturer, he expressed his clear support for the sector taking financial responsibility for their product packaging. While this is not a revolutionary idea in Europe where some countries have laws to require manufacturers to take back their products at the end of their useable lives, I believe it is a significant position to take in North America and represents an important sign of how far the industry has come.

By the end of the talk, I came to have a much better appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge of increasing recycling. The states and sometimes municipalities have each taken their own approach to recycling creating a fragmented system that does not have a unified way of handling returned plastics. Meanwhile, the recycling rates have actually fallen in the US over the last 20 years. Just what it will take to change people’s behavior is not an easy question. And while bottle bills work, Jeffery feels that they are not scalable to cover all of bottles. Retailers are not set up to handle returns. Bills were written to deal with litter, not address the failure of residential recycling programs.

Still, though, I am hopeful that McDonough and his team can come up with something better and that Nestlé will retain their commitment to fixing recycling in America.

Hello, Ann Arbor

At the end of this month, some members of the UBC Chapter of Net Impact will travel to Ann Arbor for the Net Impact North American Conference. Fourteen MBAs from Sauder School of Business will make the trip. We will use this blog to share our experiences at the conference. Look for updates as the conference begins  on Oct 28.