Developing Division Skills

DEVELOPING DIVISION SKILLS

Pre-Lesson Information:

Teacher figures out what students know about division (basic and long) Students answer questions or complete assessment
This information helps guide future lessons and supports students who are struggling

 

Generate:

Teacher gets students to compare multiplication and division and their relationship Students create fact families, skip counting sequences, etc. to show relationshipStudents create a relationship between the two concepts
When do we use multiplication and division? Division – Used for splitting items among groups, for sharing, for splitting bills at a restaurant, etc.Multiplication – for purchasing more than one item, etc.

Understanding multiplication will create a solid understanding of division

 

Evaluate:

Teachers asks students to think about basic division and try and figure out how to solve more complex problems (long division) Students explore and evaluate questions. Can they figure out how to solve the questions?Can students figure out what steps are required to different solve problems?

 

Modify:

Teacher asks students how to figure out problems with remainders.How can students use their existing knowledge to solve the problems? What happens when a number does not divide evenly?What can be done with the “leftovers?” (decimals, remainders)

When would we use decimals vs remainders?

The concept that I chose to explore is long division. Using the T-Gem method, I’m hoping that integrating technology into the process will help students grasp the concept a little more easily. I will start with a bit of information about my class dynamics and what I have done before re-introducing these students to long division. In my math class, even though, I have a grade 7 class, I have only 8 students who are actually at a grade 7 level. This has caused our school to take a closer look at how we can best support our struggling learners, since the majority of them have not been tested and therefore, are not on an IEP. As teachers, we are not able to modify the curriculum, but rather, we must do our best to adapt it in a way that makes it accessible for these learners. As part of our PLC (professional learning community), we have created small groups that focus on mastering one or two concepts before moving on. Our goal is to try and fill some of the gaps that these students have so that they can feel a sense of success. At the beginning of the year, we administered an assessment to all the grade 7s so that we could see what concepts they had mastered and what concepts they needed to spend more time on. After working with our students and looking at this assessment, we discovered that there are quite a few students who do not understand how to do long division.

I believe the first problem with long division is that many of the students do not have a solid understanding of basic division. With these intervention groups at my school, this is where we began our lessons. We started with having the students use manipulatives and moving (dividing) these manipulatives into groups. The students were shown some videos to help explain the process (BrainPop, Khan Academy).  We also related division to multiplication and showed how they are related (fact families, etc.). Phet has a division simulation that helps show this relationship. The students played “games,” worked with partners, and used whiteboards to practice. Throughout the process, the teachers in the room observed the students and created formative assessments to make sure all of the students were grasping the concept successfully.

Once this small group of students had a deeper understanding of what division is, they moved onto long division (this is the stage they are at now). One strategy that was used had the students using post-it notes to show the relationship between the numbers.

http://middleschoolocd.blogspot.ca/2013/09/throwdown-linky-post-it-note-division.html – Sorry, I couldn’t figure out how to get the visual in this document.

This helped students see where the numbers go, the relationship between the numbers and the importance of lining up columns (this was an issue for many of these learners). One colour is used for the divisor and one for the dividend. The quotient and product are the same colour as the divisor so students can see that they are related. The difference is a third colour (yellow). I am trying to figure out how I can make this digital. Does anyone have any suggestions? Once students have mastered the PROCESS of long division (I find this takes longer than expected), there a tons of games, programs, videos and apps that help students practice this skill to create a solid understanding of how to complete long division questions.

Games:

Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: http://www.math-play.com/Division-Millionaire/division-millionaire.html

Snork’s Long Division Game:

http://kidsnumbers.com/long-division/

Math Mountain:

https://www.funbrain.com/games/math-mountain

Drag and Drop math:

http://mrnussbaum.com/drag-and-drop-math/

Long Division with Scratch

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1387273/

Programs:

Mathletics

http://ca.mathletics.com/

Apps:

Division!! (free)

https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/division/id492164003?mt=8

Long Division Touch (free)

https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/long-division-touch/id574226151?mt=8

Videos

Khan Academy

https://www.khanacademy.org/tag/long-division

Brainpop

https://www.brainpop.com/math/numbersandoperations/division/

One app that is great for getting students to show their understanding and thinking is Explain Everything. In the past, I have had students create a “how to” book so that they can teach others how to do long division. I find this to be a very helpful strategy.

What strategies, resources or technology do you use to teach your students long division?

Nicole

On a side note, I absolutely loved the interactive Periodic Table in the Chemland Interactive website and wish I was able to use this during my chemistry course. Even though many of the concepts within this website are beyond what my grade 7 students are learning, some students might like to explore it if they have an interest in this subject area. In grade 7, students are learning a very basic level of chemistry, but this does not mean that some would not like to extend their learning and use Chemland to do that. They can click on any of the elements to learn more (density, boiling point, melting point, etc.). I also like that the descriptions are clear and written in a way that students can understand.

Creation of WISE and Implementation

 

  • What was the motivation to create WISE?

“WISE is different because it was developed with the explicit goal of providing a technology-enhanced learning environment for a wide community of science teachers and educational researchers” (Slotta & Linn, p. 5). WISE is free and accessible to all teachers. The website is setup so it’s user-friendly, easy for students and teachers to register. Teachers can use existing projects, create their own projects or adapt an existing project to fit their students’ interests or needs. If technology is limited, the teacher could have students work in partners or groups or it could be shown to an entire class (the students could discuss the questions as a class or in small groups). If the students were really passionate about a topic they were studying, they could create their own WISE project that could be shared with other classes. This allows students to show their knowledge in creative ways. WISE creates opportunities for students to critically think about a topic, and it allows the teacher to be a guide (when needed) rather than a facilitator.

  • How could you use a WISE project in your school or another learning environment?

In my classroom, we have limited access to technology so I would need to plan ahead as to when I would want to start a project and estimate how long it would take (there is a good time guideline for each project that will be helpful). I would have my students work in partners to help create opportunities for them to collaborate and share their ideas. Once my students, had completed a couple of the WISE projects, I would give them the opportunity to either create their own project or edit an existing one. This would give them another way to show their learning on a specific topic of choice. Many of my students like to take on a leadership role and thrive when given this responsibility.

WISE-ing up our Science Students

The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE) works with teachers, researchers and scientists to create technology enhanced, interactive, inquiry based projects. All of these projects are then editable by teachers to help fit the needs and interests of their students. The project that I chose to edit and revise was called Photosynthesis (ID 23333). I chose this topic as this is one of the topics my class will be learning about in our upcoming science units. I was really impressed with how interactive these projects were. “WISE has also proven its worth for students and teachers in classrooms around the world. This project can be judged a success based solely on the number of teachers who have adopted WISE in their science courses for all topics from grades 6-12 (ages 11-17). More than 100,000 students have now participated in a WISE inquiry project, and more than a thousand teachers” (Slotta & Linn, p.4).

These projects appeal to all types of learners. For example, our visual learners are able to learn through diagrams and videos. They also have some interactive activities that create opportunities for the students to actively engage in their learning. The students are also provided with a variety of ways to show their learning. The Photosynthesis project has multiple choice and short answer questions, as well as drag and drop activities. I would have my students work in pairs to create opportunities for them to collaborate, communicate and problem solve together. I think these projects would work great in a constructivist setting as the students get to learn at their own pace while they work through the different activities. The teacher can guide the students when they are having difficulty. The activities provided in this project, give the students immediate feedback so that they can go back and review the material if needed. If students show an interest in a particular topic, they would be able to branch out and explore the areas of interest in more depth.

I made a couple of changes to the Photosynthesis project. First, I added a BrainPop video about photosynthesis after the page titled “what is photosynthesis.” I did this just in case the students did not understand the diagram or needed a more thorough explanation.

For the open ended questions (listed below) I will have the students write their ideas down on a large post-it note paper that will be displayed in the room. This will give us discussion points after the whole class had completed the project in partners. I find that this helps students expand their thinking.

  • Plants Out in Thin Air: Have a look at the healthy plants below. Notice anything they don’t have?
  • But how do plants turn these elements into glucose? What do plants do with light energy during photosynthesis?

After my students have completed this project, I would probably make more edits and changes to it. I would use the feedback that they provide to help guide these changes. I found that I did not need to make very many changes as the author of this particular project did a great job. I also think that as I become more comfortable with using this program, I would feel more comfortable making more changes. The next project that I am interested in editing is Climate Change as my students will be working on this topic during Earth Month (April).

References:

Slotta, J. D. & Linn, M. C. (in press). WISE Science: Inquiry and the Internet in the Science Classroom. Teachers College Press.

Design of TELE and Flexible Seating

According to David Jonassen (2000), “students [do not] learn from computers or teachers-which has been a traditional assumption of most schooling… students learn from thinking in meaningful ways.” This idea supports the new BC curriculum that encourages teachers to provide students with opportunities to creatively and critically think, as well as to collaborate and communicate with their peers. Our math and science (actually ALL!) learning spaces need to provide students with a variety of areas that contain flexible seating, as well as tools that encourage students to think critically. The reason for providing choice  is because not all students learn in the same way. Some students would prefer to stand, others sitting on the floor, others need to fidget and still some of our learners prefer desks and chairs. Students should have the freedom to move between these workstations freely (as long as they can handle this responsibility). Since many teachers are moving away from doing whole class lessons, students need areas to work on exploratory activities in small groups. The designer of these spaces should ensure that they contain a variety of technology tools (VR, iPads, laptops, 3D printers, etc.) and seating choices (hokki stools, tables, couches, rugs, standing desks, etc.). All of the materials, tools and furniture in the room should moveable so that it’s easy to create different learning areas, depending on the activities the students are engaging in.

This is would be the ideal classroom that I would teach in. I could change the room around based on my students’ needs, learning styles and curriculum activities. The problem is that many districts do not have a budget for furniture and or technology (or they have a very limited one). How do we convince our districts of the importance of these items?

Video Cases

I chose to watch video 5 and video 8 as they were dealing with technology use in upper intermediate classrooms and I am currently teaching grade 7. In video 5, the first teacher interviewed was very positive about technology use in the classroom. She stated that she uses it in her classroom almost everyday as it challenges the students, compensates for language barriers for her ESL students and it levels the playing field since her students are all tech savvy. The students interviewed were very excited to share the video about hurricanes they were creating. The professor in the video 8 was also very passionate about technology use and helping teacher candidates learn how integrate it into their practice and make sure that it is enhancing student learning. It appears that both of these teachers understand the benefits of using technology and how to integrate it to deepen student understanding.

However, the rest of the teachers interviewed were not so excited, or positive about technology use in the classroom. One retired teacher and one new teacher (video 5) both stated that technology is frustrating as there is not enough time to use it, not enough training, they are not equipped to problem solve issues, and they don’t feel comfortable using it. I think both of these teacher highlighted one of the main reasons as to why technology is not integrated into some classrooms (What I found interesting is that the new teacher was not integrating technology it into her classroom) These teachers do not feel like they receive enough professional development time to comfortably introduce technology into the classroom. How do we overcome this? Even when professional development does happen, the new teacher stated that she doesn’t have time to reflect upon this new knowledge and then she quickly forgets it before she has a chance to try it out with her students. Unfortunately, some teachers do not see the value in technology use and therefore, refuse to integrate it into their daily lessons. I think the best way to overcome this is to start with the teacher education programs. I think these programs should be integrating technology into all of the courses offered. Each year, new teachers will be graduating ready and excited to use technology in their new classrooms. Most of the teacher candidates in video 8 spoke positively about technology use in the classroom stating that it creates more engaged learning, helps visual learners see the process, and helps ESL and struggling learners.

Many teachers are very excited to integrate technology into their classrooms, but others still see it as a hindrance. How can we change this? What can we do to better support these teachers? Should we focus on the teachers who are interested in hopes that this will “snowball” and get others excited once they see positive examples of technology use? Is it fair that some students are able to explore some of their conceptual misconceptions with technology and others are not?

Unpacking Assumptions

Unpacking Assumptions

  • What is a good use of digital technology in the math and science classroom?
    • This is an excellent question and probably one of the main reasons that I chose to take this course. I struggle with authentically integrating technology into my grade 7 math and science classroom. In the past, I have used iPads extensively in my primary classrooms. We used the iPad to find math in the environment. If we were learning about 2D or 3D shapes (angles, arrays, etc.), the students would go around and take pictures of actual items. They would then create a pic collage (or other visual) with labels. However, now that I am teaching grade 7, I find it more difficult to integrate technology into my math and science lessons. Part of this is because we have very little technology available to us (one laptop cart to share between 10 grade 7 classes). The best ways that I have found to use technology is to show videos of the concepts that I am teaching for my visual learners (this works great for both math and science). We also create videos to help explain our understanding to others. I prefer for my students to work in partners or small groups that are randomly chosen. This way they are engaging and conversing while using technology. This provides the students opportunities to learn from each other. Another way to integrate technology is to allow students to further explore topics that they find particularly interesting. They can do this with other students who have the same interest.
    • In my previous school, we followed the SAMR model (substitution, augmentation, modification and redefinition). This was a good model and our goal was always to aim for modification and redefinition. The first two stages enhance the learning, but the last two transform it.
    • Technology provides students with the opportunity to converse and engage in conversations with other classes, as well as experts in a particular field. We have a class Twitter account that has been a great way for us to see how other students are learning different concepts and we are able to tweet out questions that we may have.
  • What would such a learning experience and environment look like?
    • This type of environment would have the students working in small groups at a table with a variety of device (tablets, laptops, etc.). The students would be able to move around the classroom (and possibly school) freely to explore their environment. Students would have choice in what they are learning based on their interests and knowledge.
  • What would be some characteristics of what it is and what it isn’t?
    • Technology should not be a replacement tool for paper and pencil/pen activities. It should be used to extend and further the learning process in the classroom. It should be a way for students to explore a concept in a way that fits their learning style and interests.
  • How might a learning experience with technology address a conceptual challenge, such as the one you researched in the last lesson?
    • Technology can help address conceptual challenge through the use of videos so that students can see the process. It can also be a way for students to show their thinking to their peers and teachers and open up a discussion. So much learning happens in the classroom when students are given time to explore and converse with their peers. Students can research up to date articles on specific topics and this is more easily acquired with technology.
  • Is this a vision or is it possible in real classrooms?
    • I think that many classrooms are well setup up with technology and many have flexible seating and open concept floor plans with lots of learning stations. However, some classrooms still lack the proper funding to provide up to date technology for all students.
  • What makes this vision a challenge to implement and what might be needed to actualize it?
    • The challenges that arise are funding, professional development and teacher interest and passion in regards to technology use. Some teachers have access to technology, but because of a lack of training or a fear, they do not implement it into the classroom. In order for teachers to feel comfortable, the need to be given access to technology and time to learn and feel confident using it with their students. Other classrooms have very little technology, but they have teachers that are passionate about integrating it.  

Conceptual Challenges

In the video, Heather has a misinformed understanding of the moon’s phases and the seasons. However, her teacher was not aware of these misconceptions before she introduced the unit of study. During her lessons, Heather was trying to merge her existing knowledge with the new information the teacher was introducing. The teacher needed to understand her students’ background knowledge before she began the new unit of study. Only through her understanding of her students’ prior knowledge, will she be able to help scaffold her students’ learning.

As we can see in this video, there are many misconceptions around scientific understandings. This may be because new scientific discoveries have been made that contradict existing theories or that the learner only understood part of the concept and tried to fill in the gaps. Many scientific theories are abstract and therefore, difficult for students to visually see the process. The use of models in science can help with the visualization process. Teachers also need to understand students’ prior knowledge and misconceptions on any given topic before they begin to teach it. This will help guide the teaching process and activities based on what the students already know, what they think they understand, but really don’t, and what they are interested in learning. If students are not interested in a topic, it will be more difficult for them to learn. If they do not see the relevance of the concept to their daily life, they will not take an interest in learning more about it.

When I was teaching primary grades, one of the topics that my students always had a difficult time understanding was cloud formation and precipitation. I often wondered if the difficulty arose because the students couldn’t actually see the process or touch it. The best we could do was create diagrams or models to help with this. However, some of the students still had a difficult time explaining the process. Often times, they would appear to understand, but as time would pass their understanding would diminish. In the Thompson and Logue article, the students ranged in age from six to twelve years old. Most of the students were able to describe how clouds were formed, but had strong misconceptions about precipitation. According to the authors in both articles, scientific misconceptions come from a variety of sources, including misunderstanding information from parents or teachers, as well as from sources, such as mass-media that provide inaccurate information. Misconceptions are often difficult to change and these can impact the learning process. According to the article, Children’s Ideas and the Learning of Science, people who attend the same lecture or read the same book will not necessarily understand it in the same way. Individuals internalize the experience and construct their own meanings. The authors argue that student beliefs are reviewed or revised when a more persuasive or a better theory is introduced, but sometimes “even if students are confronted with what appear to be contradictions to the teacher, they will not necessarily recognize them” (Driver, et. al., 1985, p. 3). Thompson and Logue believe that teachers need to figure out their students misconceptions so that students do not continue to build their knowledge upon these misunderstandings. The issue is not where these misconceptions come from, but rather how we identify them and overcome them in the classroom when teaching our students.

The best way for students to understand many of the scientific concepts being taught is in a constructivist learning environment that encourages students to take risks and explore through hands-on experiments. The teacher acts as a facilitator or guide and supports the students throughout the learning process. It would not be an effective teaching style for a teacher to simply tell the students that their existing understanding or beliefs about a given topic are incorrect, but rather he or she needs to provide students with exploratory lessons that “show” the students. Technology is a great tool to help support the science lessons and curriculum in the classroom. Some of the simple ways that it can be used is to watch (up to date) videos or have students create their own videos on a given (or chosen topic). There are some great interactive whiteboard applications that allow students to draw and record their learning and thinking. This gives the teacher another way to identify any misconceptions that may exist.

References:
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas and the learning of science. Children’s ideas in science, 1-9.

Thompson, F., & Logue, S. (2006). An Exploration of Common Student Misconceptions in Science. ERIC, 553-559. Retrieved January 8, 2018, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ854310.

Interview Abstract

Keywords: lack of support, lack of training, lack of funding and limited access to technology

The teacher that I chose to interview is a grade one/two teacher at a school with a high percentage of ELL students. She currently has 284 students in her school and 18 in her class. 16 out of 18 of her students are identified as ELL. She has access to a cart of iPads that contain enough iPads for every student to be able to have their own. There is also a computer lab that they are able to use. She has a projector in her classroom that she uses to display examples, videos and student work. She has been teaching for 14 years in a variety of grade one and two classes. This interview took place on Saturday, January 20 at 3:57pm at her house.

These are the questions that I chose to ask. I asked the sub questions (1a and 4a) when I wanted her to expand on some of her ideas.

  1. Research has indicated that teachers are hesitant to integrate technology into their practice due to the perceived lack of support and personal experience with technology.  How would you describe your experience in developing a sense of confidence when implementing technology into the classroom?
    1. Do you feel like you have other teachers that you can collaborate with?
  2. How do you think the school/district has helped or hindered your implementation of technology in the classroom? Some examples are funding, resources or support.
  3. Are 1:1 device programs necessary for integrating technology effectively in mathematics? Are students at an advantage if they do have their own device?
  4. Comparing last year when your students had their own devices versus this year where your students use school devices, what are the advantages and disadvantages to each?
    1. Did you find that your students did use their iPads at home for anything?
  5. How do you integrate technology into your math and science classroom?

Lack of Support and Training

The interviewee, Lesley, states that the biggest obstacles that she faced when she first began integrating technology into her classroom were a lack of support and training. When she began integrating technology into her classroom a few years ago, she relied on social media platforms to find support and ideas from other teachers. “I relied a lot on Twitter and following people who were using it in their classrooms and I was taking ideas and trying to implement them into my own classroom.” She describes her experience as somewhat of a solo one and she felt like she needed to discover ways to make it work for her students. “Initially, I was left to my own devices to try and figure out how to make it work in the classroom… when we were first told to implement technology, we were given no support or training on how to do it effectively.” In her new school, she feels more supported as she is able to collaborate with a couple of new teachers, and they have a technology mentor that supports them when needed and provides workshops for interested in teachers. “We have a couple of new teachers at my school who are very into using technology and our tech mentor is a good resource person to talk to… He has put on a couple of different workshops about coding and about our e-portfolio program that we use in the district that have been quite helpful.” Unfortunately, many of the older teachers in her particular school are not interested in learning how to use technology with their students. “A lot of the older teachers at my school are a bit more hesitant or don’t like using technology.”

Lack of Funding and Limited Access to Technology

Along with a lack of support and training, Lesley believes funding to be an issue. When there is a lack of funding for technology, this limits the amount of technology that can be purchased for the classroom. She feels very fortunate because at her new school she has access to a set of iPads that contain enough iPads so that her students can each use one. She assigns the students the same iPad so that they continue working on projects the previous day. “Our iPad cart initially only had 20 devices, but having a class of 18, I was able to jump into using technology without a lot of difficulty. My kids could still be 1:1, and they could be assigned to the same device and because a lot of the teachers don’t use it, it’s been fairly easy to book and get time with the iPads whenever I have wanted to.” Some of the teachers with larger class sizes were not as fortunate. Just recently, her school was able to find funding to purchase more iPads, but sadly this didn’t happen until almost half of the school year was over. “We recently used a bit of our learning grant money and our school has bought some additional iPads. So now our carts are full so that the older grades that have higher class numbers are now able to go 1:1 on the devices and [students are] not having to share. So I think for those teachers it was kind of a big hindrance.” Lesley does worry that as more teachers start integrating technology into the classroom, this will make it harder to find available times to use technology. “Funding definitely is going to be an ongoing issue as more and more teachers get used to using more technology and it becomes harder to find times [available] to use it; this will be a bit of a hindrance.” Even though she usually has access to technology, she still wishes that she had her own class set. Her reasoning is that it would be nice to have for those teachable moments that arise in the classroom. No matter how much we plan as teachers, our students will often take us down a different path. These are the times when it would be nice to have unlimited access to technology. ”Not having them in the classroom all the time is kind of a pain. Sometimes you think, oh if they were here, I could grab them and do this. You have to be much more planned and organized and you can’t use technology as kind of a spur of the moment thing, which sometimes naturally comes out of an activity – oh I wish we could’ve done this on the iPad. I think in that way, not having your own set for your class is bit of a hindrance. Given the funding concerns in the public school system that probably will never happen.”

I’ve had a very similar experience to this teacher. I have found that there doesn’t seem to be a lot of training and support to encourage teachers to integrate technology. I think the overarching reason for this is that there is a lack of funding, which makes it difficult for school districts to provide opportunities for teachers to get training and it also prevents each classroom from having enough technology to access. These obstacles deter many teachers from attempting to use technology with their students. What this teacher shows us is that there are ways to find support and training, even if you have to discover it on your own. I truly believe that if teachers are truly passionate about integrating technology into their classroom and see the value of it, they will find a way to overcome these obstacles.

Interview Transcript

Thanks for taking the time to answer these questions! The first question is

  • Research has indicated that teachers are hesitant to integrate technology into their practice due to the perceived lack of support and personal experience with technology.  How would you describe your experience in developing a sense of confidence when implementing technology into the classroom? (Nicole)

Answer:

  • Initially I was left to my own devices to try figure out how to make it work in the classroom. At my old school, when we were first told to implement technology, we were given no support or training on how to do it effectively. I relied a lot on twitter and following people who were using it in their classrooms and I was taking ideas and trying to implement them into my own classroom. This year when I started a new school I felt like I was quite competent in being able to implement the technology because I had had a couple years of being able to play with it. (Lesley)

Reflection: Even though this teacher faced many hurdles and obstacles, she still managed to embrace technology and learn how to use it with her young students. She used her own time to connect with other teachers and find ideas on social networking sites.

Question:

  • Do you feel like you have other teachers that you can collaborate with? (Nicole)

Answer:

  • We have a couple of new teachers at my school who are very into using technology and our tech mentor is a good resource person to talk to. A lot of the older teachers at my school are a bit more hesitant or don’t like to use the technology. We also have a really great tech mentor in the district. He has put on a couple of different workshops about coding and about our e-portfolio program that we use in the district that have been quite helpful. (Lesley)

Reflection: It seems that it is the younger or newer teachers that have an easier time embracing technology. Could this be because they are using technology in their Education Program courses? Or is this because this is a generation of students who used technology in most of their schooling? It could be a combination of both!

Question:

  • How do you think the school/district has helped or hindered your implementation of technology in the classroom? Some examples are funding, resources or support. (Nicole)

Answer:

  • I think we are fortunate that we have such small class sizes this year. For example, our iPad cart initially only had 20 devices, but having only a class of 18, I was able to jump into the technology without a lot of difficulty. My kids could still be 1:1 and they could be assigned to the same device and because a lot of the teachers don’t use it, it’s been fairly easy to book and get time with the iPads whenever I have wanted to. We recently used a bit of our learning grant money and our school has bought some additional iPads so now our carts are full so that the older grades that have higher class numbers are now able to go 1:1 on the devices and not having to share. So I think for those teachers it was kind of a big hindrance. There’s something about having the children be able to go to the same iPad where their work and pictures are saved that makes it a little bit easier. Funding definitely is going to be an ongoing issue as more and more teachers get used to using more technology and it becomes harder to find time to use it makes it a bit of a hindrance. Not having them in the classroom all the time is kind of a pain. Sometimes you think, “oh if they were here, I could grab them and do this.” You have to be much more planned and organized and you can’t use technology as kind of a spur of the moment thing, which sometimes naturally comes out of an activity – “oh I wish I could’ve done this on the iPad.” I think in that way, not having your own set for your class is bit of a hindrance. Given the funding concerns in the public school system that probably will never happen.

Reflection: Even though there is a lack of funding in districts, there are ways of getting technology or creative ways of using the technology that does exist. It’s not always easy to share devices in a classroom and it’s even harder to share with one or more classrooms. Sharing allows less time, creates more issues when projects take longer than expected, but it is still possible to troubleshoot these issue. Teachers need to get creative. Maybe districts will be able to come up with more funding the more teachers use technology in the classroom. Teachers might need to advocate for more technology and do presentations that showcase how the technology is being used and how much more learning the students are doing.

Question:

  • You’ve kind of already answered this question, but do you have anything you want to add? Are 1:1 device programs necessary for integrating technology effectively in mathematics? Are students at an advantage if they do have their own device? (Nicole)

Answer:

  • Well, I don’t think they necessarily have to be 1:1. I think you can still effectively integrate technology without 1:1. I think 1:1 is a luxury that just makes it so much better. I believe in the idea of 1:1, but like I said, having the same device to go back to is nice for the kids so that they can continue projects or they can use things they’ve created before. (Lesley)

Reflection: Having enough devices for every student is ideal, but it’s not impossible to create authentic lessons with only a few devices. Maybe sharing devices would create a more collaborative classroom?

Question:

  • Comparing last year when your students had their own devices versus this year where your students use school devices, what are the advantages and disadvantages to each? (Nicole)

Answer:

  • I think one of the advantages to having school devices is that there is no temptation to play and get on programs that were put on at home. The school devices only have what we’re using at school. There is no chance of them going home and erasing any of their work by accident. The nice thing about having their own devices is that they can go home and parents can see what they’re doing on a consistent basis and you’re able to show the work a bit more naturally. Ultimately, I don’t think there is really that much of a difference between the devices that go home versus the ones that stay at school. (Lesley)

Reflection: There are some disadvantages in regards to classroom management when students have their own devices. I think teachers think that it would be simpler if all students just brought in a device, but we often overlook some of the issues that might come with this. In my student-owned BYOD program, it was difficult when a student would forget their device at home or sometimes the device would be broken so they wouldn’t have it for an extended period of time. This was extremely difficult as we didn’t have school devices that the student could use and therefore, I always had to be prepared with an activity for one or two students to work on if they didn’t have a device. It was even more challenging if they were in the middle of a project. I LOVED having devices, but this was definitely frustrating. Losing work was also sometimes an issue as the students would take the device home and a sibling would accidently erase something that they were working on. This caused some frustration from time to time. This reminds me that there isn’t a perfect system, just like there is never a teaching day that is perfect!  

Question:

  • Did you find that your students did use their iPads at home for anything? (Nicole)

Answer:

  • They did use them at home for continuing projects or if they were inspired by something that we would’ve done at school and they would have used it at home to do something in addition, but I don’t think they used them to better the project we were doing in the school. Well, a couple of them might have. (Lesley)

Reflection: Often I think that it would be so nice to have students work on projects at home using their device, but the reality is that students are busy in the evenings and most students do not have time. I also am not a teacher who believes in assigning a ton of homework because I want my student to be part of community activities, sports, playing outside, etc.  

Question:

  • Ok, last question… How do you integrate technology into your math and science classroom? (Nicole)

Answer:

  • In math, one of the things we did this year was to use our iPad to show how to make 10 in addition. They use different manipulatives in the classroom and take pictures and record the math sentence that goes with it. They would either put it in a pic collage or do it on Explain Everything. In science, one of the things we did was we used their iPads to take photos of different places in the school that we use water because we’re doing an inquiry unit on water and the water cycle. They’ve also used materials in the classroom to build a water cycle and they’ve’ taken a picture of it and are able to use Explain Everything to explain how the water cycle works in their own words. In math, they were practicing using the number words and writing the number words and they were taking photos of four objects and then they would write the number 4 and the word “four.” This allowed them to practice it in different ways. I think that’s it. (Lesley)

Reflection: Sometimes it’s difficult to think of ways to integrate technology into our science and math lessons, but when we collaborate and network, there are so many great websites and ideas that can be used. Teachers need to find the time to share, as well as reach out to other educators.

Thanks again, for taking the time to meet with me to answer my questions. (Nicole)

First, apologies for not having this as a double column post, but I had technical difficulties (irony of this in an educational technology masters course!). My reflections for each question/answer can be found underneath each one. After reading through my peers reflections and interviewing a colleague, the challenges of using technology in the classroom have become clearer. I think in order for teachers to overcome these obstacles, they have to philosophically agree with the benefits of technology, and they have to want to invest the time in continuously learning about new technology and how to authentically integrate it into the classroom to extend student learning. There always seems to be some sort of excuse as to why teachers are not using technology, but I truly believe that these can be overcome. I do however, believe that schools have to want to invest time and money into technology and I know that this can be difficult, but there are ways to make it happen (through grants, proposals, etc.).

In my district, we have a serious lack of technology. My goal is to make some changes through our technology committee. I know that some school will be able to integrate a BYOD program, but we need administrators and the school board to be interested in making some changes and supporting teachers who are already integrating technology. These teachers need support and to be provided with time. I think that once other teachers see the benefits and that they will be supported, they will start to embrace technology a little more. I find it frustrating that some students have no access to technology and others use it daily. Is this just widening the gap between some learners? Don’t all of our students deserve equal access to technology and have the right to learn 21st century skills? According to the 9 themes of Digital Citizenship, We need to ensure that everyone has equal access to technology in our society. Digital citizenship means no one should be denied digital access. Students need to learn the importance of advocating for equal digital rights. How do we make this a priority in all school districts and schools? I’m hoping to make some progress in my school district!