Although the project had its errors and limitations that robbed away some key geoprocessing opportunities, the data that worked from the primary files are substantial and a good visual and numerical representation of the research. Californian forest fires occur only under a very specific set of environment, which pertains to a certain elevation range, certain slope aspect, demanding the tree species from that particular elevation range as well as the right mix of having enough ‘fuel’ to fire in relation to the maximum potential flammability of the conditions. People don’t inhabit locations near wildfire spawning grounds, but the large conglomeration of people around the southern Central Valley and Los Angeles are under no less threat from the fire, given by the topography of the area and their proximity to the mountain adjacent to them. The fires have a strong impact on Pollution levels and contribute to high PM 2.5 particle values in the atmosphere, which is a direct safety concern to inhabitants. Toxicity levels, asthma cases and cardiovascular concerns exhibit lower correlation to forest fires and are therefore not primarily influenced by the wildfires. Fire stations are positioned with greater concern given to the maximum population density areas more so than necessary the areas, which are under maximum wildfire threat.

Although the state does not have control over precipitation patterns nor wildfire spawning grounds, the project points out the kind of hazards that pose the most relatable risk to individuals. There is scope for California to better prepare and mitigate wildfire risks, investing in greater and more efficient fire-fighting policies, and position the fire stations around places likely to be a spawning ground. Side issues like the potential for better planning with diverting dam water, diversion of water from a neighboring state, protection of technological hubs and agricultural lands from the wildfires are all worth considering as a further study to follow up on the findings of my project.