hey guys! i hope mitderms isn’t killing all of us yet! and finally, i can come here and write a blog!
(warning this isn’t going to be long cause yes, i gotta jump right back into my econ textbook!)
recently, i purchased a nestle watter bottle and i finally saw what nestle has written on there bottles now. If you guys didn’t know, Nestle decreased the size of the bottle cap and is using an average of 27% less plastic on each of there bottles.
to me, this shows me exactly the ECONOMIC in what we learned – CDSTEP.
within the macro environment of a business or product itself, they have to look at the economic factors like “growing” social trends. And without a doubt, Nestle is falling into ‘becoming green’. Because merchandisers like to see that they are doing their part in contributing to a more ‘green’ world, they will want to buy Nestle’s watter bottle if they see the information about their decreased size caps.

as you can see one of the ads here, they are now ‘eco friendly’ and ‘green’
However, to my opinion, that’s not the sole purpose. although it may sound like it
i was thinking to my self: how come they have to take up more than a quarter of the wrapping around the bottle to inform everyone about this decrease? their slogan “together we can make a difference. please recycle”. It makes us feel proud that we’re purchasing an eco friendly water bottle. but doesn’t it come to your mind that its reduces their cost?!?!
yesyes, one bottle wont do much, but imagine how many of these bottles they produce each day, each period, each year!
Conclusion, to me, Nestle is winning both sides. They are earning more revenue from ‘green’ customers and reducing their production cost by lots!! To me, Nestle wouldn’t have changed their packaging of the cap if it weren’t for their own profit benefits. what do you guys think?





