Does McKenzie Therapy Improve Outcomes for Back Pain?
Brian Busanich and Susan Verscheure, our neighbours from the south – the University of Oregon, Eugene – asked this clinical question in their article published in the spring 2006 issue of the Journal of Athletic Training: “What is the clinical evidence base for McKenzie therapy in management of back pain?”
The authors used a good EBP methodology, to be included in their review a study had to be: (1) the study was a randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trial, (2) the subjects’ primary complaint was nonspecific low back pain or neck pain with or without radiation to the extremities, (3) the authors investigated the efficacy of the McKenzie method/McKenzie treatment in comparison with no treatment, sham treatment, or another treatment, (4) individualized patient treatment and treatment were specified according to McKenzie principles, and (5) the authors reported at least one of the outcome measures of pain, disability, quality of life, work status, global perceived effect, medication use, medical visits, or recurrence.
The authors used 7 evidence based databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE, CINAHL, PEDro, the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews – an excellent selection! I would also add SPORTDiscus to their strategy…
McKenzie therapy was compared with the following: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, educational booklet, back massage with back care advice, strength training with therapist supervision, spinal mobilization, or general mobility exercises.
Main results included:
– Trends favored McKenzie therapy at intermediate-term (3–12 months) follow-up for pain and disability, as well as work absences.
– The McKenzie treatment group in the cervical spine study had less pain and disability at both short- and intermediate-term follow-up than did the exercise group, although the effect sizes were small. The same McKenzie treatment group tended to have fewer health care contacts in the ensuing 12 months than the comparison exercise group.
The results suggested that McKenzie therapy provides a reduction in short-term pain (mean reduction of 8.6 on a 100-point scale) compared with the therapies mentioned above.
Conclusions: This review provides evidence that McKenzie therapy results in a decrease in short-term (12 months) outcomes or outcomes other than pain and disability (eg, quality of life).
Here is the link to FREE full-text for this article published on PubMed Central – http://tinyurl.com/nzsfu , and here is the link to full-text PDF (18KB) – http://tinyurl.com/pedzc
Share your comments with others in the Comments Section 🙂