Black Lives Matter Vancouver March to Protest Police Participation in Pride 2017

Black Lives Matter Vancouver (BLMV) March, called March on Pride was about the protest of numerous issues that affected QTBIPOC. However, the opposition against uniformed police participating in the Vancouver Pride Parade was central to the march (The Georgia Straight, 2017 & The Vancouver Sun, 2017). Considering the troubled history with law enforcement and queer people of color, the organization used the parade to voice its concerns. These concerns consisted of intimidation, harassment and the enactment of violence by agents of the state, particularly towards Blacks and Aboriginals.

I submit that there is also a problematic history between QTBIPOC and the white LGBT community. Even though the BLM Vancouver stressed the significance of not having uniformed police in the Pride parade, the Vancouver Pride Society allowed it (The Vancouver Sun, 2017). This scenario calls into question which personhood is valued more, whose voices are worthy of being heard and which bodies can occupy the space of belonging. In addition, the protest addresses the matter of the spatialized zones of oppression and trauma and the role of the city’s culpability. Additionally, the group voices its objection of the LGBTQ consumption at the expense of the lives of some queer people of color by blocking corporate involvement (The Georgia Straight, 2017 & The Vancouver Sun, 2017).

The march was from Yaletown to the West End on June 25, 2017. The parade route is significant since it represents a space of marginalization and psychological trauma for QTBIPOC. This continues to occur because of the white gay middle class’ performance of homonormativity in order to “belong” through the modes of the family, the state and market sanctions (Agathangelou et al 2008). This agenda is still being accomplished through their privileged status in engaging the city’s authorities in removing “unworthy” bodies such as people of color who were destitute, trans and sex workers. Although these disenfranchised individuals consider this zone their home, the city’s authorities regarded them as a threat to the city’s investments (Paola et al 2015 & Agathangelou et al 2008). Taking into account that these factors are related to social justice, human rights and poverty, the participants assembled at Emery Barnes Park at Davie and Seymour streets, which was named after the first Black male MLA in B.C. These topics were also the focus of Barnes’ personal and professional career.

The parade expressed Barnes’ philosophy by including the themes of safety and the celebration of people of colour. Therefore, it was a proclamation that reframed the Vancouver Pride Parade by making it a more inclusive event for queer, two-spirit and trans people of colour. Bearing this in mind, the organization demonstrates that there was a clear connection between Blacks and Indigenous Peoples. This was illustrated by Kamloops-based two-spirit activist and Thompson Rivers University instructor Jeffrey McNeil from Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc Nation who spoke at the protest about the overrepresentation of black and indigenous communities in jails, child apprehension and abduction cases, and profiling and death (The Georgia Straight, 2017). McNeil reinforced the group’s ideology of deposing of corporate sponsorship. This is because the embracement of capitalism by the LGBTQ community has diluted the original intent of Pride in New York City’s Stonewall riots in 1969. BLM Vancouver reiterated McNeil’s comments that Pride was about queer people of colour fighting back against raids by the police (The Georgia Straight, 2017). These protests, which were viewed through the lens of racism, was a means of coercing queer of colour individuals to confirm to normativity. In the past normativity was achieved through raids, currently one of the main instrument is racial profiling. The leaders of BLM Vancouver demonstrates Paola et al’s (2015) theory of placemaking by the utilising the march as a medium to create a space for their voices. This tactic was also a survival strategy.

The leaders of the organization are Black feminists. As such, they are representatives of the feminist of colour theories of The Combahee River Collection (1982). One of the mandate of the Collection is the establishment of a domain of value for women of colour that takes into account their race, gender, sex, and class. This is accomplished through the mode of identity politics, which states, “personal is my political”.
The Black Lives Matter Vancouver march echoes the mantra of the Black Lives Matter Movement, which is also that of Martin Luther King Jr and Nelson Mandela, which is “no one is free until we are all free”.

Work Cited:
Aagathangelou, Anna, M. Bassicchis and Tamara L. Spira. (2008). Intimate investments: homonormativity, global lockdown and the seductions of empire. Radical History Review, 100:120-143

Combahee River Collective. (1982). The Combahee River Collective Statement. In Smith, Barbara (ed.), Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthropology, pp. 264-274

Paola, Bacchetta, Fatima El-Tayeb and Jin Haritaworn. (2015). Queer of Colour Formations and Translocal Spaces in Europe. Environment and Planning D, 33(5): 769-778

The Georgia Straight. Black Lives Matter Vancouver march in West End to protest police participation in Pride 2017. Retrieved November 7, 2017 from
https://www.straight.com/life/929181/black-lives-matter-vancouver-march-west-end-protest-police-participation-pride-2017

The Vancouver Sun. Black Lives Matter holds alternate Pride march in Vancouver. Retrieved November 24, 2017 from http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/black-lives-matter-holds-alternate-pride-march-in-vancouver

Black Lives Matter Vancouver and Toronto

Black Lives Matter Vancouver:

Cicely-Belle Blain co-founder of BLM Vancouver states that when Black Lives Matter is written about in mainstream and independent media, the point is usually completely missed (The Built Environment, 2016). This is because “‘mainstream media’ usually just means white media — as in, media written BY white people, FOR white people (The Built Environment, 2016). Rather than try to make ‘mainstream’ sound neutral, call it the ‘whitestream media. For instance, one of the mainstream media columns was are informed by a racist climate of white supremacy that requires black communities and black activism to be constructed as dangerous and disruptive (The Built Environment, 2016). Another depicted the organization as disruptive by questioning if, it was only Black lives that mattered. It further states that “Black Lives Matter” is a phrase that almost always fuels controversy and a wide range of heated reactions (The Built Environment, 2016). This is a reminder that the media is controlled by whiteness and therefore like its audience, it expresses white fragility. As a result, although racism is central the Black lives, this is not considered a factor, since everything is viewed through colour-blind racism (The Built Environment, 2016).

Blain opposes the co-optation of black experiences by white media-makers/writers and shares the specific strategies that they and the BLMV team have used in resistance (The Built Environment, 2016). This involves delving into historical research, to sharing Instagram memes, to building visible community presence through photography/video, to learning from the institutional experiences of academics of colour at the University of British Columbia (The Built Environment, 2016).

In addition, the movement deconstructs documentaries, like “Do Not Resist”, winner of best documentary of the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival (The Built Environment, 2016). This film is a depiction of the militarization of the local police departments since 9/11 (The Built Environment, 2016). As it relates to Vancouver, this medium signify the policing, suppression and dismantling of Black voices like those of Hogan’s Alley. Similarly it is an illustration of the many in which law enforcement police and control Aboriginal bodies, particularly in marginalized zones such as the Downtown Eastside. As well as the surveillance of brown bodies who occupy the space of the stranger, threat, and by extension (The Built Environment, 2016) the monstrous, Muslim terrorist (Puar & Rai, 2002).

Black Lives Matter Toronto:

Janaya Khan, one of the co-founders of Black Lives Matter Toronto states that the Canadian police, media, and society at large are inundated with anti-black racism. In addition, the movement is perceived by the media as a social, systemic, structural power because it challenges the homonormativity of the white queer community and mainstream Canada (Maclean’s, 2016). Both the Vancouver and Toronto chapters of Black Lives Matter opposed police presence in Pride parades with regards to racialized police brutality, but white Queer people benefit from police presence and inclusion in Pride parades because it assists in achieving homonormativity (Agathangelou et al., 2008). The “good” white Queer citizen can gain institutional acceptance by distancing themselves from and erasing Queer people of colour, posing as citizens on the same side of privileged white heterosexual people, emphasising the benefits of their whiteness and denouncing the detriments of their Queerness (Agathangelou et al., 2008). Because Queer activism is mobilized through homonormativity, Pride parades are restricted in what type of activism, and what type of Queer people, can be used in demonstrations. Thus, “freedom depends on the (re)founding of unfreedoms” (Agathangelou et al., 2008, 131). While Pride parades are designed to challenge heteronormativity, in practice, they actually normalise homonormativity, which then leads to homonationalism (Puar, 2007, in Greensmith & Giwa, 2013).

Extending upon homonationalistic discourse, many Queer activisms have a goal of obtaining social rights and acceptances through assimilation into current social structures, which leaves behind more vulnerable group members, such as Queer people of colour (Cohen, 1997). Similarly, immigrated citizens are forced to assume a lifestyle that benefits the market and values of economy (Ferguson, 2003). Who is deserving of inclusion and acceptance is dependent on the enhanced or subdued ability of citizens to assimilate in and adapt to cultural norms, which Aihwa Ong (1999) called “variegated citizenship” (in Chávez, 2010, p. 138). Therefore, both Queer people and migrant people challenge and threaten “family values” and the familial status quo, and they are often cited as the source of a multitude of social problems, such as the marriage crisis (Chávez, 2010).

Furthermore, when queerness becomes inherently radical and taken up my white discourses of oppression, queer people are imagined as white, and Black/other people of colour are imagined as homophobic and backwards due to their race/religion, banishing queer people of colour from mainstream queer activism (Bacchetta, El-Tayeb & Haritaworn, 2015; Haritaworn, Tauqir, & Erdem, 2008).  Additionally, these imaginations can perpetuate the “dual process of incorporation and quarantining” (Puar & Rai, 2002), which also erases people of colour from Queer activism. Rather than focusing on the binary of heterosexual/Queer, Queer activism should pay attention to the varying identities within the Queer community, regarding race, class, and gender (Cohen, 1997). Consequently, the Pride parade  as a form of queer activism serves to promote the social visibility of Queer people through occupying space, and a person’s representation in a Pride parade relies on “commercialism and commodification of identities,” (Enguix, 2009, p. 24). Sonia E. Alvarez (1997) writes about the “NGOinization” of social movements (including Pride), which describes how these movements rely on corporate funding for mobilization (in Agathangelou et al., 2008). In this way, social movements backed by socially marginalized groups are forced to coincide with global capitalist relations to eliminate their own social marginalization. Pride parades emphasise consumption and, as a result, racialized Queer people and Queer people of low socioeconomic status are underrepresented (for example, because they cannot afford elaborate costumes, cannot take time off from work to participate, or because they cannot/refuse to support capitalism; Greensmith & Giwa, 2013). With regards to the BLM movement being viewed as social, systematic, structural power, this is due to the fact there is the perception that it bullied Pride and it hijacked the parade. This is unfortunate because the entity consists of a group of marginalized individuals whose mandate is to defend disenfranchised groups against the police and racism. Additionally the use of languages such as “bullies” and “hijackers” regarding the organisation, by multiple mainstream media is problematic and dangerous. This is bearing in mind that Blacks already live in cultural and institutional racism. Additionally, whites who opposes the authorities are not associated with such languages. Therefore the media is displaying anti-black practices (The Globe and Mail, 2016).

In another aspect, blackness as deviating from normality relates to the grand discourse of anti-Black racism through representation within media as spoken about by Khan of Black Lives Matter. Khan documents the fact that between 2005 and 2015 the federal black inmate population grew by 69% (Maclean’s, 2016). This is the fastest growth rate of any group including Aboriginals. What is more startling is that the Black populations makes up 2.9% of the population yet there is a 10% inmate representation in the federal prison (Maclean’s, 2016). Some these “inmates” are immigrants who arrive in Canada to visit their family member but they do not fit nation-state’s definition of a moral and good citizen. And therefore begs the question who is allowed to enter the border of the state and who belongs.  As a result they are detained in jail awaiting a decision by the courts.  It is for this reason that the organization speaks for Blacks and Aboriginal because their issues are intrinsically linked (Maclean’s, 2016). For example, on April 2016 First Nations communities “occupied the offices of Canada’s Indigenous Affairs Department to demand action over suicides as well as water and housing crises in their communities” (Democracy Now, 2016). These series of protests took place days after “the Cree community of Attawapiskat declared a state of emergency over attempted suicides” (Democracy Now, 2016). These protests were not constrained to one region in Canada, but were “set-up occupations inside and outside the offices of Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada in Toronto, Regina, Winnipeg and Gatineau, Quebec” (Democracy Now, 2016). Black Lives Matter activists stood in solidarity with Indigenous protectors, after just weeks earlier launching their “15-day encampment outside police headquarters following news there would be no criminal charges for the police officer who fatally shot a South Sudanese refugee named Andrew Loku” that last July (Democracy Now, 2016). First Nations activists also showed up in solidarity, standing alongside BLM and their allies, in the same place Indigenous activists show up each year to protest the state and police complicity within the devastating issues surrounding the systematic ignoring of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls (Democracy Now, 2016). To comprehend the relevance of Indigeneity and Indigenous resistant and sovereignty within the BLM movement, there must be an understanding that BLM organizes with the comprehension that they do so on stolen and often unceded Native lands. In addition, the police brutality and state sanctioned violence which targets Black/ Muslim and non-Muslim bodies, stems from the same institutions which developed policing as a way to guard the colonial state (Democracy Now, 2016). This form of colonial-stemmed policing ensured that Indigenous folks did not leave the locales of reserves and that the settlers would be so-called “protected” from the savage Others (Democracy Now, 2016). The struggle of deportation, Islamophobia, badge accompanied gun violence which hovers over Black trans, queer and cis bodies is parallel to the state sanctioned horrors faced by Indigenous folks who are attacked by swat police when protecting their waters/ lands from pipelines and corporations, and the passing off of murdered and missing loved ones. Black and Indigenous struggles therefore are intrinsically interlocked, making this relationship the core of the BLM’s politics of resistance and struggle on stolen lands.

 

Work Cited:

Agathangelou, A. M., Bassichis, M. D., & Spira, T. L. (2008). Intimate investments: Homonormativity, global lockdown, and the seductions of empire. Radical History Review, 100, 120-43.

Alvarez, S. E. (1997). Latin American feminisms ‘go global’: Trends of the 1990s and challenges for the new millennium. Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures: Revisioning Latin American Social Movements. S. E. Alvarez, E. Dagnino, & A. Escobar (Eds.). Boulder: Westview.

Bacchetta, P., El-Tayeb, F. & Haritaworn, J. (2015). Queer of colour formations and translocal spaces in Europe. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(5), 769-78.

Chávez, K. R. (2010). Border (in)securities: Normative and differential belonging in LGBTQ and immigrant rights discourse. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7(2), 136-155.

Cohen, C. J. (1997). Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: The radical potential of Queer politics? Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 3, 437-65.

Democracy Now.(n.d.). Occupied Canada: Indigenous & Black Lives Matter Activists Unite to Protest Violence & Neglect. Retrieved November 25, 2017, from https://www.democracynow.org/2016/5/20/occupied_canada_indigenous_black_lives_matter

Enguix, B. (2009). Identities, sexualities, and commemorations: Pride parades, public space and sexual dissidence. Anthropological Notebooks, 15(2), 15-33.

Ferguson, R. A. (2003). Introduction: Queer of colour critique, historical materialism, and canonical sociology. In Aberrations in Black: Toward a Queer of Colour Critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Greensmith, C. & Giwa, S. (2013). Challenging settler colonialism in contemporary Queer politics: Settler homonationalism, Pride Toronto, and Two-Spirit subjectivities. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 37(2), 129-48.

Haritaworn, J., Tauqir, T., & Erdem, E. (2008). Gay imperialism: Gender and sexuality discourse in the ‘war on terror’. In Out of Place: Interrogating Silences in Queerness/racialiality. A. Kuntsman & E. Miyake (Eds.). York: Raw Nerves Books.

Ong, A. (1999). Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer times. I. Grewal, C. Kaplan, & R. Wiegman (Eds.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Puar, J. K. & Rai, A. (2002). Monster, terrorist, fag: The war on terrorism and the production of docile patriots. Social Text, 72(20), 117-48.

Schwartz, Z. (2017, July 06). How Black Lives Matter co-founder Janaya Khan sees Canada. Retrieved November 25, 2017, from http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/how-black-lives-matter-co-founder-janaya-khan-sees-canada/  

The Built Environment. (n.d.). TALKING BACK: How whitestream media f*cks up when talking about Black Lives Matter. Retrieved November 25, 2017, from http://www.mediacoop.ca/audio/talking-back-how-whitestream-media-fcks-when-talki/36096

 

Spam prevention powered by Akismet