Black Lives Matter Historically and Locally

The essence of the broader Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement stems from the enduring struggle the Black community in the United States faces in response to violent systematic racism. BLM as a social movement takes inspiration from the ideologies of queer and Black activists such as those in the Civil Rights movement and the Stonewall riots. The three essential women of colour organizers of the original Black Lives Matter movement were Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi (Global BLM 2015). They organized in 2013 in response to the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman. Zimmerman fatally shot 17 year old Trayvon Martin while on neighborhood watch, after perceiving Trayvon as a threat despite evidence of him being unarmed and not threatening (Global BLM 2015). In the aftermath of the tragedy, George Zimmerman was acquitted for murder, sparking outrage against the state-permitted violence against people of colour. This devastating saga reignited the necessity of a movement that calls out the institutional racism and prejudiced police brutality Black folks experience. The continued deadly police brutality that took the lives of many, including: Tamir Rice, Tanisha Anderson, Mya Hall, Walter Scott, Sandra Bland and many other victims, encouraged the political intervention of BLM due to the systematic targeting (Global BLM 2015).

The movement grounds itself in queer of colour theory by centering conversations around the disproportionate violence that Black women and Black trans women experience. The militarized police response to the 2014 Ferguson protests, for the brutal murder of Mike Brown by police officer Darren Wilson, was a larger scale reiteration of the institutional violence to which Black communities are subject. The state-sanctioned use of tear gas and pepper spray against BLM organizers illuminates the ways in which the justice system violently treats people of colour. After this event, the organizers of BLM inspired activists to introduce chapter organizations in cities across America, and now the globe. The rising number of Black folks killed by police officers in the U.S. has, and continues to, stir communities to seek an end to state-sanctioned, racist violence. This has resulted in the proliferation of BLM chapters in most major cities across the U.S., as well as in Canada, Australia, Brazil, South Africa, the U.K. and many more (Christi, 2016). Black Lives Matter came to Vancouver in March of 2016 in order to draw attention to the violence endured by invisible Black communities in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, as well as to organize in solidarity with other chapters across North America (Vancouver BLM, 2016). The reach of the BLM movement is unlimited and global, because it addresses the problem of systematic police brutality that is faced by people of colour everywhere. In this way, the non-local BLM movement inspired local activism and organizing, in support of a community otherwise rendered invisible and subject to state violence.

In discussing the history of Vancouver’s chapter of Black Lives Matter, it is vital to mention the significance of Hogan’s Alley. Hogan’s Alley, a neighbourhood bordering Vancouver’s Chinatown and Japantown, was destroyed in 1970 as per the construction of the Georgia Viaduct. Prior to its dismantling, this neighbourhood was home to many black families, businesses, and a church. In the context of the Black Lives Matter Vancouver chapter, the history of erasure and displacement of Black bodies in Vancouver cannot be ignored. The dispossession of the Black community living in Hogan’s Alley was just one step in this erasure, along with the erasure of Black citizenship from the public conscious. While it is by no means correct, there is often the assumption that very few black people live in Vancouver or the surrounding Lower Mainland. This ideology detaches the diverse experiences of Greater Vancouver’s black population, and further, overlooks the occurrence of anti-Black police brutality, and the larger anti-Black actions existing in Vancouver. While the elimination of Hogan’s Alley is a shameful part of our history, discourse in Vancouver must recognize the continued erasure, displacement and marginalization of Black people today.

Moreover, the Vancouver chapter of Black Lives Matter takes into consideration their presence on unceded, Indigenous territory. This recognizes that the displacement of people out of Hogan’s Alley is only one narrative of Canada’s larger history of displacement of Indigenous folks, as well as marginalization of minority/migrant communities. In its formation, Black Lives Matter Vancouver addressed the historical and present violence against Indigenous and Black, specifically queer and trans, bodies enacted by the police.

In addition to addressing the connections between Vancouver’s histories of systematically oppressing and erasing Black lives, it is also necessary make connections to other organizations (which do not necessarily have ties to Vancouver) that emphasize mobilizing and organizing Black feminist activisms, such as the Combahee River Collective. It is another group of Black feminists who have been working towards defining the group itself and their interaction with other organizations and movements. Black Lives Matter has commonalities with the Combahee River Collective—in committing to work against oppressions concerning race, gender, sexuality, class, and especially how they work together to affect marginalized groups. BLM Vancouver’s statement on their chapter website specifically state that they aim to “centre the voices of Black folks as well as other folks of colour and hope to lift up those who are queer, women, trans, differently abled, poor, or otherwise marginalized” (Vancouver BLM, 2016). It is pertinent to note that, though BLM has been critiqued for its emphasis on Black lives and has been retorted with “All Lives Matter”, their statement reflects how BLM has never been about valuing only Black Lives. Rather, it is a recognition of those who have been traditionally and systematically devalued, allowing the voices that have been silenced or ignored to be heard—especially those of Black lives because this organization is founded by Black feminists. This statement includes a variety of identities that address not only race, but gender, sexuality, class, able-bodiedness, and other marginalizations, because these are intersections that co-exist rather than categories to which an individual can only belong singularly. One can contend that “all lives matter,” but this is in fact not the case, as is reflected in legislations, statistics, and other experiences that may have gone undocumented. Through law humans may be formally recognized as equal, yet groups like BLM challenge the inequalities that do indeed occur. The Combahee River Collective ends their statement by saying that they “know that [they] have a very definite revolutionary task to perform and [they] are ready for the lifetime of work and struggle before [them]” (Combahee River Collective, 1982, 281). This illustrates how the political work done by activists is part of a larger, broader process. It is a journey, it takes time, and most of all, it takes work.

 

References:

Christi, Jeyolyn. “The International Reach of Black Lives Matter.” NAOC, 2016, natoassociation.ca/the-international-reach-of-black-lives-matter/.

global, BLM 2015. blacklivesmatter.com/about/herstory/.

Combahee River Collective. (1982). The Combahee River Collective statement. In Smith, Barbara (ed.), Home girls: a Black feminist anthology, pp. 264-274.

Vancouver, BLM. “About Us.” Black Lives Matter Vancouver, 15 July 2016, blacklivesmattervancouver.com/about-us/.

Two Spirit Representation in developing xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) Band’s Block F

In order to analyze a local place I looked no further than the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) people, where the University Endowment Lands (UEL) sits. On my route to campus I noticed a large plot of Pacific Spirit Park being cleared out for what seemed to be the start of construction development. This turned out to be UBC’s Block F Project, which is zone MF-1 of the endowment lands, and was proposed by the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) Indian Band to provide a variety of commercial, community, residential and other land uses (PlaceSpeak). The land uses sound like they intend to pave way for economic and community opportunity for-and-by the Musqueam Indian Band. This development seems promising because it offers economic gain and a communal opportunity space for Musqueam people, but current plans bypass Two Spirit involvement.

Upon reading the information provided to the public thus far about Block F I found they had a timeline of the planning process, which began in December of 2012 and over the course of four years hosted three community consultation events with two more coming up (PlaceSpeak 2017). Among the frequently asked questions section on the public overview of the plans, the Musqueam’s goal was said to be to develop the land to provide income and revenue for the Band, in order to “become economically sustainable” (PlaceSpeak 2017). The decision to use this land was made by the Musqueam Band thus they acknowledge their participation in the capitalist system within they have been forced to assimilate. This can be seen as a form of reclaiming their land for economic and communal compensations for the Band, that were once unavailable due to colonial intervention on the unceded territories. This is an example of indigenous economic sovereignty, which is when First Nations people possess an inherent right to self-determination of political, legal, economic, social, and cultural systems (Chiefs of Ontario 2017).

Among the public UEL Block F Design Guidelines there is a comprehensive outline of the way in which the Musqueam nation will blend the traditional and the modern in the design construction. It is important to note the positive ways Block F is being designed in order to respect the unceded territory it is on. They will include 3.1 acres of park space and trails in order to preserve green space, trails, and wetlands. Despite this still being a constructed form of ‘nature,’ it offers preservation of Pacific Spirit Park, which is important to the Musqueam Band, thus upholding First Nations sovereignty (Musqueam Capital Corp. 2017). The commitment made to include green space and communal amenities offers a great opportunity to provide for-and-by indigenous spaces, but seems to lack a focus of whom the communal spaces are targeting. The Goals and Objectives section of the Guidelines says it will, “Provide Neighborhood amenities geared for UEL residents” but this doesn’t specify who makes up UEL residents or how accessible it will be to Indigenous Two- Spirit folks (PlaceSpeak Documents 2017). Two Spirit indigenous students and residents of the UEL should have a community gathering space within this site if it intends to provide amenities for the Musqueam Band as well as the broader UEL community.  The intergenerational trauma colonization caused resulted in experiences of homophobia and transphobia in indigenous communities, which often forced Two-Spirit folks to leave their communities (PHSA Trans Health 2017).

The Musqueam Band’s sovereign decision to produce Block F asserts economic self-determination, but lacks plans that offer self-determination to Two Spirit indigenous residents on UEL. If the land is going to be utilized for First Nations residents and communities it should also offer Two Spirit community involvement and representation. There is much to come for this developing block, so there is hope that through further community discussion and development more distinct amenity spaces will be defined and discussed. It is important that planning for sites such as these incorporate trans, two spirit and gender non- conforming First Nations people in order to account for many folks in the indigenous community who suffer discrimination due to the intervention of colonial gender binaries.

 

 

Works Cited

Bonar, Thane. “Musqueam & UBC.” Aboriginal Portal, aboriginal.ubc.ca/community-youth/musqueam-and-ubc/.

“Block F Upcoming Activity.” University Neighbourhoods Association, 13 June 2017, www.myuna.ca/2017/06/08/block-f-upcoming-activity/.

Chiefs of Ontario. “Understanding First Nation Sovereignty.” COO Website, 2017, www.chiefs-of-ontario.org/faq.

“Musqueam Capital Corporation.” Musqueam Capital Corporation | Musqueam, www.musqueam.bc.ca/musqueam-capital-corporation.

PlaceSpeak. “UEL Block F Project Status.” PlaceSpeak, www.placespeak.com/en/topic/508-uel-block-f-project-status/.

PHSA, Trans Health. “Two-Spirit.” Transgender Health Information Program, 2017, transhealth.phsa.ca/trans-101/two-spirit.

“‘Where There Is a Word, There’s a History’: Two-Spirited Community Organizer Harlan Pruden Comes to UBC.” The Talon, 14 Jan. 2015, thetalon.ca/where-there-is-a-word-theres-a-history-two-spirited-community-organizer-harlan-pruden-comes-to-ubc/.

An Analysis of the “5 Days For the Homeless” Fundraiser

The charity event titled “5 Days for the Homeless” is hosted at UBC by the Commerce Community Program at the Sauder School of Business, and its goal is to raise $10,000 for their chosen charity Covenant House Vancouver by staying outside as if homeless on the UBC campus. Some of their ‘conditions’ include, going without shelter, technology, basic amenities, or disposable income for five days, they must also be given any food they consume. This local charity event aims to address a wider problem of homelessness in Vancouver, but fails to address the wider non-local issues that disproportionately displace QTBIPOC folks and youth thus contributing to homelessness overall. On a broader scale in British Columbia Trans and gender non-conforming folks experience high levels of discrimination and harassment when looking for housing or accessing social services (BC Poverty Reduction 2014). Trans and queer folks of colour as well as aboriginal two-spirit persons experience even higher levels of discrimination due to the intersection of being racialized and queer (BC Poverty Reduction 2014). This event inappropriately mimics homelessness in Vancouver and the charity funds could be better utilized to aid LGBTQ2S* and QTBIPOC folks who suffer disproportionately from poverty and homelessness in BC.

The event itself has its front and center poster image of the Sauder student participants with cardboard signs strung around their neck, cups and hands held out, with faces of longing as if pretending or dressing up to be homeless (Sauder 2008). This image is unsettling as it dresses the participants up as homeless, when they are aiming to help the homeless. Mimicking tends to ‘Other’ people because it makes a character out of homelessness.

The circumstance of the ‘homeless’ experience this fundraiser aims to recreate is different to the unknown someone who is displaced and marginalized living on the streets goes through. There are intersections of oppression experienced by QTBIPOC persons who are forced to live on the street besides the physical suffering this event mimics. According to the BC Poverty Reduction fact sheet on LGBTQ issues, “29% of trans people often report being turned away when trying to access shelters, and 22% report being assaulted by residents and staff” (BC LGBQT Poverty Fact Sheet 2014).” Not to mention, one in four queer and trans youth in BC are forced out of their families’ homes due to identity-centered conflicts (BC LGBQT Poverty Fact Sheet 2014). These emotionally draining tribulations contribute to the overall suffering of being in poverty and homeless. Clean warm sleeping bags, curious peers on campus, and welcoming campus security all contribute to the ways this event cannot simulate homelessness in Vancouver. Homeless people cannot guarantee their safety or a welcoming response from the police sleeping on the streets. Under the picture is an article that continues on to describe the intention of the original “5 Days for Homelessness Campaign” as “…created by three University of Alberta business students as a way to support the disadvantaged and help change public perceptions of business students. (Sauder 2008).” This clearly defines their intention to improve public image and perception of business students on a general non-local level by hosting a charity event for the ‘disadvantaged.’

Their choice of charity, Covenant House, is the largest privately funded charity in the Americas for homeless and exploited youth as well as being a Christian affiliated organization (About Covenant House 2017). Despite toting a rainbow flag at the bottom of their webpage, Covenant House’s religious ties and separate gendered services could discourage Trans and Queer folks (Covenant House Vancouver 2017). Critics of Covenant House draw on opinions circulating among LGBTQ2S+ youth that describe the environment to be homophobic (Murphy 2005). Their split gender locations discourage gender non-conforming LGBTQ2S+ persons, and the high client to staff ratio makes it harder to protect the most vulnerable and targeted (Murphy 2005). An example of a homeless charity organization that focuses on the most marginalized among homeless youth and the root of the local problem is Rain City Housing. They offer housing specifically targeted towards Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer, Two-Spirit, Plus (LGBTQ2S*) youth and is the first of its kind of program in Canada (Raincity 2017). They address that 25-40% of the homeless population in Vancouver is LGBTQ2S* when only 10% of the total Vancouver population identify as LGBTQ2S* (RainCity 2017). This highlights the way the “5 Days for the Homeless” fundraiser could better affiliate with an organization that accounts for the QTBIPOC homeless youth in Vancouver and British Columbia overall.

The Sauder hosted charity event could more effectively support the local homeless population of Vancouver by affiliating with an organization that addresses and cares for LGBTQ2S* and homeless youth of colour on a grassroots local level. The Sauder Business School should address the intentions of the event and rethink whether they are doing it for a public relations image or for the benefit of the truly most marginalized and disadvantaged in Vancouver. The Covenant House being the biggest charity in the America’s reaffirms the way the money raised could make more of an impact going to a organization that cares for those forgotten about by the big charities. This event as it stands inappropriately mimics homelessness in Vancouver and the charity funds could be better utilized to support the most overlooked local homeless population whom are LGBTQ2S* and persons of colour.

 

 

Works Cited

“About Covenant House.” About Covenant House | The Homeless Hub, 2017. homelesshub.ca/toolkit/chapter/about-covenant-house.

Covenant House. “Welcome to Our Homepage.” Covenant House Vancouver, www.covenanthousebc.org/.

Habib, Sadia. “’Othering’ in Education.” The Sociological Imagination, sociologicalimagination.org/archives/18405.

Murphy, Jarrett. “Wounded Pride.” Village Voice, www.villagevoice.com/2005/04/19/wounded-pride/.

Rain City. “LGBTQ2S* Youth Housing.” Raincity Housing, www.raincityhousing.org/what-we-do/lgbtq2s-youth-housing/.

Sauder Business School. “Sauder Students Take Part in 5 Days for the Homeless Campaign.” Suader School of Business, 2008. www.sauder.ubc.ca/News/2008/Sauder_Students_Take_Part_in_5_Days_for_the_Homeless_Campaign.

“University of British Columbia.” 5 Days for the Homeless, 5days.ca/schools/ubc/.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet