SoleRebels vs. TOMS

Toms Red Polka Dots Womens Classics ShoesAn internationally well-known brand, known to give individuals the experience of helping others in need while acquiring a stylish pair of canvas shoes for themselves. The founder of TOMS, Blake Mycoskie visited Argentina 9 years ago and decided that he wanted to help the children there upon witnessing their hardships without shoes. From that, Blake created the One-for-One model. For every pair of shoes purchased, TOMS will give away a pair of shoes to a child in need. Over the next few years, TOMS expanded their work to cover areas such as clean water, eyesight, safer births along with shoes.

soleRebelsOn the other hand, SoleRebels, began when Bethlehem Tilahun Alemu had the idea that “the creation of shoes could be a platform for inspiration hope.” Since 2004, SoleRebels trained and hired “those thought unemployable.” SoleRebels, trains and provides a way of life for the community. Contrary to TOMS before their expansion to other areas. SoleRebels products are also all handmade, and made from the most eco-sensible materials and with the most energy sufficient manner possible.

Though TOMS intended the One-for-One model to only have positive influences and outcomes, it generated a negative impact as well. By simply giving away shoes, TOMS is taking away from local businesses and communities that are wanting to survive. Though with a few tweaks and alterations to their business, TOMS is now supporting communities in more ways than just shoes.

Personally, I would support SoleRebels over TOMS (even though I own a pair of TOMS myself). I find myself choosing SoleRebels over TOMS because their core value of helping people grow instead of providing handouts, even though handouts aren’t necessarily bad; it’s just not as proactive. This mindset and value that I’m drawn to is extremely similar to the value that I try to instill in my junior cadets; they won’t grow if you don’t give them the opportunity to learn.

 

sources:

http://www.toms.ca/about-toms#companyInfo

http://www.solerebels.com/pages/solerebels-101

 

http://newflatmall.com/images/toms/Toms%20Red%20Polka%20Dots%20Womens%20Classics%20Shoes.jpg

http://photo.faircompanies.com.s3.amazonaws.com/users/faircompanies/photos/soleRebels_jpg_122x122_crop_q85.jpg

 

Groceries: With a CLICK

The personal shopping program called Click & Collect is now available across 7 Superstore B.C Locations. First started in Toronto about a year ago, this program allows shoppers to “Click” what they would like to purchase; meats, fruits, cereal…anything! Then set up a time for pick up. How convenient! Customers even have the option to bring their own re-usable bags.

Screen Shot 2015-11-14 at 9.52.23 PMThough there is a small catch, this service costs $3-5 depending on the traffic during the time the customer requests for pick-up. I think that this service is going to be quite a success due to the following value propositions:

  1. SAVING TIME: Families or people that work long days can easily do their groceries on their phones, computers, etc and even on their way to work! Then easily go pick up their pre-bagged and paid groceries.
  2. PLANNING: With the holidays rolling in full force, customers can easily skip the busy lines and order everything they need for the perfect holiday get together.

Though beneficial for the customer, an issue that I see with this program for the company is that they’re pretty much helping people eliminate their impulse buys. Which means they’re pretty much cutting out a section of their revenues. According to this article, impulse shopping decreases by 13% on a planned trip while increases by 44% if the customer is travelling by car. As well, during 40% of store visits, shoppers make the an average of 3 unplanned purchases.

I don’t know about you, but I always tend to reach for another chocolate bar and shade of red lipstick when it’s RIGHT THERE in front of me.

 

 

sources:

http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2015/11/superstore-online-ordering-vancouver/

https://shop.superstore.ca/

http://betabait.com/the-impulse-shopping-fact-sheet/

Two, Four, Six, Eight, Who do we appreciate? RE: SHOULD CANADIAN COMPANIES ENFORCE THIS?

This week, we were joined by two other lovely professors (though not as lovely as Paul and Jeff of course), that discussed an almost too-utopic-and-too-happy-to-be-real company called Zappos. We discussed different types of organizational cultures, and how one might work for a certain company but might not necessarily be successful for another. My classmate Judy Sin, discussed in her blog post how she believes that the government should decrease the working hours from 8 hours to something even less. Though that may be a good idea at first glance, there certainly are many repercussions to this move.

changeable moods

Let’s say that our government reduces our maximum hours per day of work down to 5-6 hours, for all companies across Canada. This is going to increase variable costs for many companies, and some smaller companies just won’t be able to handle it.

Many small companies employ a certain number employees and assign shifts in terms of days versus hours. Let’s say the store is opened exactly 8 hours everyday. These companies will then have to pay 2-3 hours of overtime or hire another employee and perhaps shortening shifts available for employees just to cut back on costs.

Overall, this will create unnecessary variable costs. I do agree with Judy that the mental health of employees greatly affect the productivity and efficiency of companies as a whole, but it all depends on the type company in the end.

Just like Zappos, companies that want to change their hours and build a unique company vibe can! However, I believe that it’s up to the company to decide how they want to shape their organizational culture, not the government.

sources:

http://static.squarespace.com/static/50a18ffce4b081ffff7c1bb8/50a52d87e4b0d3e710fbbf48/50a52d8be4b0d3e710fbbfc1/1280825841000/?format=original

https://blogs.ubc.ca/judysin/

Polystyrene; Deteriorates in 3 weeks, not 100 years.

Danny and Alexandre found a “pain” of the world, and took matters into their own hands. In 2009, my cousin, Danny Luong and Alexandre Allard at the age of 18, discovered a way to decompose polystyrene in just 3 weeks as opposed to its nature of 100 years.  Like we discussed in our most recent COMM 101 discussion, sometimes taking the frustrations that you have and finding a solution could be the start of an entrepreneurial career.

“I think the most rewarding part of the project is the fact that it has the potential not only to be marketable, but also to be beneficial to the environment,” beamed Luong.” -Concordia News

 

12211325_10208150960435452_2031417435_o

The pair could easily charge an insane amount of money for their creation like Turing Pharmaceuticals. However, what’s inspiring is the fact that they want to maintain the “key element [as] being able to make a difference.” They would also like to take further steps with this project in hopes of seeing this cost effective solution being implemented in third world countries. From the labs to winning the International Stockholm Junior Water Prize and working at Deloitte, I’m excited to see what my cousin Danny has in store for the world.

(Perhaps starting his very own social enterprise?)

 

sources:

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/the-ones-to-watch-2/

http://www.concordia.ca/cunews/main/stories/2012/02/01/concordia-student-makes-environmental-breakthrough.html

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/drugmaker-to-roll-back-5000-per-cent-price-hike-after-outcry/article26493735/