“The Trenchcoat” (Week 9)

Having studied pretty much nothing about Romania up until now, I appreciated the glimpse into history that “The Trenchcoat” provides. At the same time, the censor-conscious writing and the inability of the characters themselves to acknowledge exactly what is happening to them made this period seem even more mysterious to me. Nearly every paragraph of the text had me feeling simultaneously frustrated and intrigued.

As mentioned in the lecture, “The Tenchcoat” involves a lot of small and possibly meaningless details that are brought up in largely ordinary situations – observations and bits of conversation that might be perfectly normal during a car ride, a dinner party, a marriage. Most of what happens is so “normal” that, when the air of suspicion started to set in, I was almost inclined to brush the characters’ concerns away. I believe this could have to do with the idea that nothing “exciting” happens to “boring” people in literature – I think I’ve gotten used to characters that are meant to stand out or appear likeable in some way, and so it was a little more difficult for me to believe that Manea’s characters really weren’t getting nervous over nothing.

Strangely enough, even though I doubted the characters’ suspicions at some points, I was still very much affected by the atmosphere of uncertainty that Manea creates. I fully believed in the power of the Romanian government and the existence of the interrogation practices referenced, and I think that helped me to understand why the characters have their concerns, despite my hesitancy to admit that there might be any particular truth in them. In this way, I was able to connect with the idea of “close reading” (as described in the lecture) in both literature and the lives of the characters.

Something that I’m still curious about is the role played by each of the three men – Ali, Mr. Beldeanu, and “the Learned One.” Ali seems to be friends with the other two, but they aren’t exactly friends with one another; Beldeanu is an important man, but much of his significant “action” comes from Ali’s accounts; and “the Learned One” – whom I briefly thought to be an actual child – never does anything particularly interesting except for appearing to be out with Mrs. Beldeanu. Are these “learned” men truly more aware of what is happening than the others are? Are they unconcerned, or simply unable to discuss the situation within “earshot” of the reader?

4 thoughts on ““The Trenchcoat” (Week 9)

  1. Daniel Choi

    Are these “learned” men truly more aware of what is happening than the others are? Are they unconcerned, or simply unable to discuss the situation within “earshot” of the reader?

    Great question. I personally think, like others, that they were normal people that didn’t know much more than anyone else around them. However, I don’t think that meant they were unconcerned. They could, perhaps, have had suspicion towards the whole situation (this common theme of “disbelief”). Also, the censorship could have been an additional factor as to why they couldn’t speak explicitly about it. However, ultimately, I feel they were just like anyone else; full of suspicion, uncertainty, and limited in ability.

    – Daniel Choi

  2. madi wilde

    I think that the other characters in the story were normal people and it was meant to showcase daily life in Romania at that time. I do not believe that the ‘Learned One’ was significantly smarter than the rest of the population.

  3. patricio robles

    You make interesting points, especially about the unreliable characters. As we have seen during this course, some texts are about issues that may be familiar to us, others not so much (such as Zobel’s novel-I don’t know if you read it). In The Trenchcoat, perhaps it is difficult for us to situate ourselves in that scenario that seems so “normal” and mundane, so we have to make an imaginative effort.
    In my opinion, Manea does a great job of expressing that confusing, paranoid and even surreal context and time.

  4. ASTHAKUMAR

    ” I believe this could have to do with the idea that nothing “exciting” happens to “boring” people in literature” – I found this particular phrase of a lot of interest in your essay!
    I believe that the characters chosen to be a part of the book were mere ordinary citizens (perhaps making their lives and them boring) because it is their histories that get erased and become invisible in the historical context of Romania, and other authoritative regimes and political turmoils.

Leave a Reply