Categories
Shrouded Woman

My two cents on the shrouded woman

I’m beginning to think that reading is not for me lol. This was only around 100 pages and I even struggled to finish that within a couple days. But I do feel like it is getting easier with more and more readings. Especially easier than the combray reading we had to do.

Starting off, It’s very intersting that the book starts off with the main character dead in a coffin. To be honest, I had to go back and reread the beginning to figure this out. I think I missed a couple details and thought it was just a metaphor for her life being mundane. It was a first to see something like this in a book and made me really respect the author’s creativity.

Relating to the lecture, from the book we can see the sad reality of how women can be treated as objects rather than people. Ana Maria was still being admired for her beauty even when she was dead. This means that even in death, she was being evaluated and her value was tied to how she looked rather than who she was or other less shallow traits.

Marriage is also shown as more of a societal show. Her husband isn’t a bad person per say, but still made Ana crave for a better connection. Especially because she didn’t freely choose her partner. It feels like the relationship was based more on social expectations and duties. I believe this is what made her more attached to her love for Fernando and even Fred. Because she was unsatisfied in her current marriage, this turned into regret and longing. She looks at these 2 guys and imagines what could’ve been. How different choices may have led to a vastly different outcome in her life.

Another interesting point that was covered in the lecture was the fact that the women in the book were not only isolated from men but also from each other. The story’s characters, like Maria Greselda and Anita, don’t work together to form a strong female family/community but instead create rivalry and competition for approval and attention. At first, this seemed to me like such an immature thing for adults to be doing. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it’s not really their faults but rather baked into the social structure that they live in. Because of the limited power and identity they are given, they inevitably have to compete for the small ounces of validation available.

Categories
Proust

Zzz

If I’m being 100 percent honest, this book was a harder read than I expected. I don’t know if it’s because I haven’t sat down and read a proper book in a while or if the pacing was extremely slow. I found myself constantly constantly staring at the same paragraph for 15 minutes, restarting it whenever I got distracted. First of all, the whole thing about the goodnight kiss was interesting. My first thought was that this kid was being too overdramatic on whether the mom would come up or not. But I then started to become empathetic towards him since at that age, every problem for him probably seems like the end of the world. I lowkey felt bad since looking back I’ve definitely over-reacted on certain issues when it honestly didn’t warrant that big of a reaction. Another thing I noticed was how slow the book progressed -> which I know the author probably did on purpose. But we spent so much time reading about sleeping, waking up, being super confused, and about childhood rooms. But after I think about it I guess he’s showing us how memories are very abstract with no logical or chronological structure. On top of this I also had a hard time reading the sentences. They were so long to read and grammatically ambiguous. Like I finished a sentence and forgot what the start was talking about. When I for sure thought the sentence would end here, it just kept going. But enough about me complaining. Lets start with Combray, a central part of the book. I understood that the author was trying to emphasize not so much on what happened there, but how the place made him feel. The routine, meals and other more subtle details he remembers tells us how it’s a warmer place that makes him feel safe. There was also the Madeline part which honestly made sense, where a specific taste or smell can unlock memories. I’ve definitely had instances where I smelled something familiar scents such as laundry detergent or a specific perfume which brought me back to my childhood when life was good. Where the biggest worry I had during that time was what food was gonna be at dinner and when the next album for my favourite artist was going to release. Overall, I would say that this was kind of a harder read since I’m getting back into the rhythm of reading but I think as the course progresses I’ll have an easier time concentrating on the pages.

Categories
Uncategorized

RMST introduction blog

Hi everyone! I’m a 3rd year student currently pursing a major in Economics and a minor in Commerce. This being nothing related to those fields, I’m taking this course to mainly to fill the literature requirement but at the same time felt like this course would be an interesting time. It’s not everyday you see a course named romance studies. The first thing I felt was cool about the class was the contract grading. Like the professor mentioned, I believe that this takes away a lot of stress on grades especially when studying for the exams. As long as you do what you say you will do, you will receive the contracted grade which I think is very fair. I will say that I’m not a big fan of reading but regardless it is a very valuable skill to learn and we have the option to read shorter texts which I like. My goal is to read a little bit everyday instead of pushing it to to the last minute but we’ll see how long this lasts 🙂 Going to one of the first lectures it was quite different from what I imagined. I thought we would only be talking about the book we read about but this was not the case. The main focus of the class was an abstract theme or idea and then we related this to the book. Another unexpected part of the class was how discussion heavy it was. I kind of expected the in-class days to follow a lecture format where the professor just sits there and explains things but now I know that you are supposed to watch the lecture before hand and then you come to class for the discussion. Watching the first lecture was interesting. Besides the housekeeping things, the way he explained what romance studies is was quite puzzling. The lecture made me think more about how academic disciplines are kind of constructed rather than natural or fixed. I found it interesting how the professor argues that Romance Studies doesn’t belong to any specific place or “Romance World,” and that this is actually a strength rather than a weakness. Overall watching this first lecture helped me make the connection that the course is less about learning a specific tradition and more about questioning things. I hope to have fun in this class

Spam prevention powered by Akismet