Author Archives: Jon

April 5 Reflections

revolution

[From José and Jon:]

Overall, we though that our conclusion class went well. During our planning, we knew that there were a lot of different topics and themes that we wanted to discuss, and that it was going to be hard to cover all of them in one class.

We tried to point to as many topics as possible, especially ones that had run throughout the class, but we also wanted to point to themes that we had mainly only touched on briefly, and which deserved greater expansion and development.

It was good to ask the class to supply further themes that we’d covered, but weren’t in our list, to add to our collective intelligence and knowledge about what we’ve achieved over the semester.

We had started the semester with the question of “what is a revolution,” and wanted to return to it now that we had covered a range of texts that addressed more specific, sometimes more personal matters, in the context of concrete revolutionary processes. So this was a chance to return to more abstract and theoretical questions about revolution.

Even though we included a large range of revolutionary topics in our lesson plan, we were still able to discuss almost all the topics that we set out, and also to focus on issues of revolutionary texts, leadership and narrators, and especially in conclusion on whether or not we still wanted a revolution.

Although we were trying to wrap up the class, collectively we were still thinking of new ways to interpret what we had learned throughout the semester.

Finally, we asked whether or not everyone still wanted a revolution. Although some people’s opinions hadn’t changed–perhaps, nobody’s–the discussion and reasoning that people had to back up their opinion were newly informed by the topics that had been discussed over the past twelve weeks.

April 5

This is the first version of the lesson plan that José and I have come up with for today (also a PDF document). A rather prettier and more up to date version can be seen as a Google Doc. All this is to accompany a set of Google slides that you can view.

1966-beatles-revolution-70

Revolution: A Concluding Lesson Plan

Jon: Play song (Beatles, “Revolution 1”). Start playing before class starts. Briefly discuss lyrics. Note that even in 1968, supposed year of revolutions, disillusion was already setting in. Aim: to start discussion and set the framework of returning to initial discussions from 12 weeks ago. 5-10 minutes max for questions:
Is it true that we all want to change the world?
Was/is revolution a matter of fashion?
Should revolution be fashionable?
Is the personal more important than the political?
Is it really going to be “all right”?

Jon and José: Go through agenda for the day. 3 minutes

Jon and José: Revolutionary themes. Go through the themes, pointing out how much we’ve covered over the past twelve weeks. And this isn’t even an exhaustive list of the themes we’ve touched on. Unfortunately, some of these have been raised but we didn’t necessarily follow through. Is that partially a result of the form or style of the class? Would it have been more “efficient” if it had been based on lectures? What would have been the upsides and downsides of that? But we hope the class, and these themes, will stay with you/us. In the meantime, we can’t do justice to everything but we’ve picked a couple of “big issues,” including returning to questions raised right at the start… Aim: to get people to think critically (but productively) about the course as a whole, both content and form. 5-10 minutes
What themes came up that we’ve missed?
What themes should have come up but didn’t?
Which themes should we have spent more time on?
Have certain themes or concepts changed over the class?
Should we have done more? How?
Should we have tried to do less?

Jon: What is Revolution? Go through slide show and quotations. Maybe talk briefly about some of the images. For final questions, split into pairs to answer them (one question per pair), then get back into group discussion. Aim: to revisit our initial questions, and consider how we might see them in a new light now. 15-20 minutes

José: What is a revolutionary text? Look at slides and set up the general question of how we establish what a revolutionary text is. Discuss the different types of texts that we have seen throughout the course. Ranging from Guerrilla Warfare to Country Under My Skin, and how each text provides its own perspective on the revolution. Aim: to set up a discussion on how our understanding of texts have changed over the course. 15-20 minutes

José: What is the role of a narrator? Look at slides and set up the general question on how a narrator affects our perspective of a revolution or text. For example does the starting text of Russell Brand be different if we read it at the end instead of the start? What our are perspectives on Che, Belli, Underdogs. Aim: to take a deeper look into how the role of a narrator affects our perspective on a revolution, its success or its meaning. 15-20 minutes

Jon and José: Do we still want a revolution? NB we may have to postpone this until Thursday. Perhaps just put these questions up (and give or send out a link to the presentation), and ask people to prepare their thoughts over the next couple of days. Set up an understanding that not all types of revolutions are the same or applicable to all situations. Aim: to think about the notion of a “practical” guide to revolution, and our own (non-academic) investment in the topic. Plus think about how we may have changed over the semester. 5-10 minutes if we’re lucky and don’t simply postpone until our next session.

Midterm (final version)

keep-calm-exam

March 8, 2016. 2-3:30pm

Together, you are to collectively produce a document (in this Google Doc) in response to the following prompt:

What are the main obstacles to revolution, or dangers inherent in trying to organize one?

You may wish to think of this in terms of practical advice to would-be revolutionaries. Imagine yourselves as consultants to the revolution!

You must make sure you respond with specific reference to the full range of texts we have read and discussed in class.

Ensure also that the document you produce is well-structured, organized, and coherent. It should have a beginning, a middle, and an end, and a coherent thesis, which may (and probably should) of course be broken down into discrete but complementary elements.

It is up to you to figure out how to organize yourselves and assign responsibilities and roles to tackle this task. The result will be viewed and assessed as a collective project, and if it is judged unsatisfactory, then everyone will be involved in rewriting and revising (and/or redoing) it until it is satisfactory.

Though I am giving no hard guidelines on length, I am expecting a substantial document. I think you should probably aim for ten pages (double spaced).

To complete this task in the time allowed, you may use whatever resources you deem necessary: books, notes, the Internet, whatever. You are free (indeed, encouraged) to talk to each other as you work together.

Good luck!

Forum on People’s Struggles

forum_poster

Come to the event that Dacyn and Simon have been organizing!

Forum on Peoples’ Struggles

Today (Friday), 4-6pm
Barber Centre Room 155

Although geographically in different regions on the globe, activists, indigenous peoples and citizens are facing very much the same struggles against increasingly repressive states and corporations. The same mechanism to suppress dissent has caused extrajudicial killings of journalists, and activists in the Philippines, as well as the arrest of Dr. G. N. Saibaba along with student leaders involved with the Jawaharal Nehru University protests in India. The same mechanisms are used by Canadian resource extraction companies to plunder land in the Philippines, India, and the Americas, while we turn a blind eye to this injustice. The same mechanisms to uproot indigenous communities have caused 40000 Lumads (indigenous peoples) in Philippines to be displaced, not to mention that the same displacement perpetrated by the state and its partners occurs to this day in the Americas.

In response to these struggles, and courageous resistance to repressive states and corporations presently happening around the world, the Revolutionary Student Movement – Vancouver chapter would like to inform students on campus about them, especially when these issues are not discussed in the lecture hall or reported widely in the media. We will be hosting a forum in the Irving K. Barber Learning Centre, Room 155 on Friday March 4th 2016 from 4-6pm where a number of speakers will be giving some presentations about these global issues. Coffee will be provided at the event. Furthermore, panelists include:
– Eviatar Bach, of the UBC Social Justice Centre, who will speak on mining injustice.
– Lakhbir Khunkhun, of the East Indian Defence Committee (EIDC), who will speak on state repression in India.
– Representatives from RSM who will speak on what our organization does.

Join us for an informative afternoon of presentations, so that we may strengthen international solidarity for our global comrades.

Facebook Event Page

Midterm Questions

[Sorry these are late… I have been having computer problems.]

Together, you will collectively produce a document (using Google Docs) in response to one of the following three prompts. It will be only at the time of the midterm itself that you will be given the specific prompt that you have to answer, but it will be one of these three:

  1. What is a revolution? And why might we (anybody) want one?
  2. What are the main obstacles to revolution, or dangers inherent in trying to organize one?
  3. How have revolutions been represented or depicted, and how should they be portrayed?

In each case, please respond with specific reference to the full range of texts we have read and discussed in class.

Ensure also that the document you produce is well-structured, organized, and coherent. It should have a beginning, a middle, and an end, and a coherent thesis, which may (and probably should) of course be broken down into discrete but complementary elements.

It is up to you to figure out how to organize yourselves and assign responsibilities and roles to tackle this task. The result will be viewed and assessed as a collective project, and if it is judged unsatisfactory, then everyone will be involved in rewriting and revising (and/or redoing) it until it is satisfactory.

Though I am giving no hard guidelines on length, I am expecting a substantial document. I think you should probably aim for ten pages (double spaced).

In the midterm itself, you are allowed to use whatever resources you deem necessary: books, notes, the Internet, whatever. You are free (indeed, encouraged) to talk to each other as you work together.

Fire from the Mountain

Omar Cabezas, Fire from the Mountain, cover

Omar Cabezas’s Fire from the Mountain is now available here.

In this version, it’s a little longer than in the one I have. I may (as with The Country Under My Skin) suggest you only need to read some parts of it, but I may not. I will look over it and tell you.

Blueprint for Revolution?

Blueprint for Revolution

I mentioned this guy in class: a Serb called Srdja Popovic has written a book called Blueprint for Revolution. I plan to read it and report back.

In the meantime, here are two articles about him:

And here’s a snippet: “Even under the direst conditions, it is still possible to get people to fight for a cause. So the first step in starting a revolution is believing that it can happen, wherever you are.”